Hydrothermal synthesis of nitrogen and sulfur co-doped reduced graphene oxide anchored cuprous oxide nanocomposite for enhancing rheological and filtration performance of water based drilling fluids
Source abstract
Abstract
Borehole instability driven by reactive shale hydration and excessive filtrate invasion remains a critical challenge in drilling operations. To address this, we synthesized a novel nitrogen and sulfur co-doped reduced graphene oxide/cuprous oxide (N,S-rGO/Cu 2 O) nanocomposite to reinforce the rheological and filtration properties of environmentally friendly water-based muds. The nanocomposite, prepared via a facile one-pot hydrothermal method, was characterized structurally and compositionally, then evaluated in both polymeric and high-solid base fluids. Performance was assessed through standard and high-pressure/high-temperature (HPHT) filtration, rheological modeling, and hot-rolling shale recovery tests. Results demonstrated that an optimal nanocomposite concentration of 1000 ppm maximized fluid efficiency, with rheological behavior conforming closely to the Herschel-Bulkley model. Crucially, the additive significantly mitigated fluid loss, achieving a 58.8% and 61.3%reduction in API filtrate volume for polymeric and high-solid fluids, respectively, alongside HPHT fluid loss reductions of 57.6% and 64.1%. Furthermore, hot-rolling experiments confirmed enhanced shale stability, yielding a 20% increase in shale recovery. These targeted improvements are attributed to the formation of a dense, hydrophobic nanoplug that physically seals pore throats and chemically inhibits clay swelling, though concentrations exceeding 1000 ppm caused particle agglomeration and diminished returns. Ultimately, the N,S-rGO/Cu 2 O nanocomposite operates through a synergistic mechanism of robust physical plugging and rheological networking, providing a highly effective solution for stabilizing reactive shales in complex subterranean environments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Taraghikhah S, Kalhor Mohammadi M, Tahmasbi Nowtaraki K. Multifunctional nanoadditive in water based drilling fluid for improving shale stability. In: International petroleum technology conference. 2015. p. D021S011R003.10.2523/IPTC-18323-MS ↗
2. Zakaria MF. Nanoparticle-based drilling fluids with improved characteristics. 2013.10.2118/156992-MS ↗
3. Cheraghian G. Nanoparticles in drilling fluid: a review of the state-of-the-art. J Mater Res Technol. 2021;13:737–53.10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.089 ↗
4. Parizad A, Shahbazi K, Ayatizadeh Tanha A. Enhancement of polymeric water-based drilling fluid properties using nanoparticles. J Pet Sci Eng. 2018;170:813–28.10.1016/j.petrol.2018.06.081 ↗
5. Ikram R, et al. Recent advances of graphene-derived nanocomposites in water-based drilling fluids. Nanomaterials Basel. 2020;10:2004. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10102004.10.3390/nano10102004 ↗
6. Tian Y, et al. Leveraging a novel nanocomposite for enhanced drilling fluid efficiency. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):28304.10.1038/s41598-025-13087-z ↗
7. Deng L, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of selenium-doped nanocomposites in enhancing drilling fluid properties. Discover Nano. 2026;21(1):44.10.1186/s11671-026-04446-4 ↗
8. Tariq Z, et al. Machine learning approach to predict the dynamic linear swelling of shales treated with different waterbased drilling fluids. Fuel. 2022;315:123282.10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123282 ↗
9. Kosynkin DV, et al. Graphene oxide as a high-performance fluid-loss-control additive in water-based drilling fluids. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2012;4(1):222–7.10.1021/am2012799 ↗
10. Rana A, et al. Green nanocomposite synthesis and application: electrochemically exfoliated graphene-modified biopolymer as an effective clay swelling inhibitor for water-based drilling muds. Geoenergy Sci Eng. 2023;231:212394.10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212394 ↗
11. Kang Y, et al. Strengthening shale wellbore with silica nanoparticles drilling fluid. Petroleum. 2016;2(2):189–95.10.1016/j.petlm.2016.03.005 ↗
12. Gohar M, et al. Designing reticular and High-Entropy TiO2-Based nanotubular hybrid materials with cu: ZnO and C-Dots for Visible-Light photocatalytic wastewater remediation and oxygen evolution applications. Haya Saudi J Life Sci. 2025;10(10):509–28.
13. Omidvar M, et al. Efficiency of salinity-responsive ZnO/PEG nanocomposite on the immiscible fluid-fluid displacement and interface behavior in different formations. J Mol Liq. 2025;428:127462.10.1016/j.molliq.2025.127462 ↗
14. Bashir S, et al. Enhanced cadmium removal from wastewater using ZnO/MgO coated organo-mineral composites of biochar and bentonite: a comparative adsorption study. J Water Process Eng. 2025;78:108712.10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.108712 ↗
15. Bardhan A, et al. Biogenic copper oxide nanoparticles for improved lubricity and filtration control in water-based drilling mud. Energy Fuels. 2024;38(10):8564–78.10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c00635 ↗
16. Bardhan A, et al. Mechanistic performance of modified carbon nanotubes stabilized in water-based drilling fluids for high-temperature applications. Energy Fuels. 2024;38(17):16066–78.10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02548 ↗
17. Kusrini E, et al. Synthesis, characterization, and performance of graphene oxide and phosphorylated graphene oxide as additive in water-based drilling fluids. Appl Surf Sci. 2020;506:145005.10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.145005 ↗
18. Mirzavandi M, et al. Performance evaluation of silica-graphene quantum dots for enhanced oil recovery from carbonate reservoirs. Energy Fuels. 2023;37(2):955–64.10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c03150 ↗
19. Abdo J, Haneef MD. Clay nanoparticles modified drilling fluids for drilling of deep hydrocarbon wells. Appl Clay Sci. 2013;86:76–82.10.1016/j.clay.2013.10.017 ↗
20. Sadeghalvaad M, Sabbaghi S. The effect of the TiO2/polyacrylamide nanocomposite on water-based drilling fluid properties. Powder Technol. 2015;272:113–9.10.1016/j.powtec.2014.11.032 ↗
21. Ganat T, et al. Effect of metal oxide nanoparticles on the properties of nanocomposite gels for water shutoff applications: a review. Arab J Sci Eng. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-025-10189-8.10.1007/s13369-025-10189-8 ↗
22. Lu JY, et al. Facile microwave-assisted synthesis of Sb2O3-CuO nanocomposites for catalytic degradation of p-nitrophenol. J Mol Liq. 2024;409:125503.10.1016/j.molliq.2024.125503 ↗
23. Chicea D, et al. Comparative synthesis of silver nanoparticles: evaluation of chemical reduction procedures, AFM and DLS size analysis. Materials (Basel). 2023;16(15):5244.10.3390/ma16155244 ↗
24. Murtaza M, et al. Experimental investigation of pyrrolidinium-based ionic liquid as shale swelling inhibitor for water-based drilling fluids. Geoenergy Sci Eng. 2023;231:212374.10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212374 ↗
25. Ahmad HM, et al. Application of novel magnetic surfactant-based drilling fluids for clay swelling inhibition. Energy Fuels. 2023;37(12):8212–23.10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c00704 ↗
26. Ren X, Liu R, Ma Z. Experimental investigation of a low-molecular-weight polymer coating agent for deep-sea oil and gas drilling. J Pet Explor Prod Technol. 2021;11(7):2953–62.10.1007/s13202-021-01198-y ↗
27. Sharifi O, et al. Laboratory study of the application of a novel bio-based polymer to synthesize aphron drilling fluids. J Pet Sci Technol. 2022;12(2):42–50.
28. Quainoo AK, et al. Clay swelling inhibition mechanism based on inhibitor-water interaction: a COSMO-RS molecular simulation approach. Upstream Oil and Gas Technol. 2022;9:100080.10.1016/j.upstre.2022.100080 ↗
29. Kumar A, et al. Exploring the integrated potential of pyrolysis and low-temperature wet torrefaction for typical medical waste valorization: a multifaceted approach leveraging online TG-FTIR-MS, 2D-COS, iso-conversional kinetics, and reaction mechanisms. Chem Eng J. 2024;499:156464.10.1016/j.cej.2024.156464 ↗
30. Aula SA, Rashid TA. FOX-TSA hybrid algorithm: advancing for superior predictive accuracy in tourism-driven multi-layer perceptron models. Syst Soft Comput. 2024;6:200178.10.1016/j.sasc.2024.200178 ↗
31. Wang W, et al. MXene-based responsive hydrogels and applications in wound healing. ChemistrySelect. 2024;9(32):e202402073.10.1002/slct.202402073 ↗
32. Ahualli S, et al. Adsorption of anionic and cationic surfactants on anionic colloids: supercharging and destabilization. Langmuir. 2011;27(15):9182–92.10.1021/la201242d ↗
33. Ma X, et al. Quantitative analysis of high-efficiency dewatering under ultrahigh pressures: moisture storage state and filter-cake pore structure. Miner Eng. 2026;237:109969.10.1016/j.mineng.2025.109969 ↗
34. Huang B, et al. Experimental study on the characteristics, injection damage, and oil displacement efficiency of alkali-free ternary composite flooding extracted wastewater. Energy. 2025;332:137278.10.1016/j.energy.2025.137278 ↗
35. Yang H-F, et al. Swelling inhibition and infiltration promotion mechanism of polyethyleneimine. J Cent South Univ. 2024;31(2):317–29.10.1007/s11771-024-5575-x ↗
36. Khan MA, et al. Enhanced filtration performance of cellulose nanofiber/bentonite water-based drilling fluids with temperature- and salt-resistant polymers for extreme conditions. SPE J. 2025;30(09):5327–49.10.2118/228402-PA ↗
37. Guo X, et al. Recent advancements in hydrogels as novel tissue engineering scaffolds for dental pulp regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;264:130708.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130708 ↗
38. Sun L, et al. Rheological properties and the intrinsic mechanisms of fly ash/silicon-based shear thickening fluid. Rheol Acta. 2024;63(8):603–13.10.1007/s00397-024-01459-7 ↗
39. Fu C, et al. From fundamental mechanisms to applications and challenges of nanofluid flooding in enhanced oil recovery: a review. Fuel. 2025;396:135317.10.1016/j.fuel.2025.135317 ↗
40. Li J, et al. Mechanical properties of sandstones damaged by CO2 reactions and flow characteristics under complex mixed-wettability. Energy Fuels. 2026;40(4):2108–25.10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c05804 ↗
41. Liu Z, et al. Amphiphilic bioagents for cold-mix asphalt: enhancing asphalt-aggregate adhesion and moisture resistance via interfacial nanostructure regulation. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2026;181:1.
42. Cheng X, et al. Optimizing Inconel 718 micro-hole drilling using response surface and random forest methods. Measurement. 2026;262:120032.10.1016/j.measurement.2025.120032 ↗
43. Murtaza M, et al. A magnetic surfactant having one degree of unsaturation in the hydrophobic tail as a shale swelling inhibitor. Molecules. 2023;28(4):1878.10.3390/molecules28041878 ↗
44. Murtaza M, et al. Okra mucilage as environment friendly and non-toxic shale swelling inhibitor in water based drilling fluids. Fuel. 2022;320:123868.10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123868 ↗