Analytical solution of nano-concrete-epoxy interaction area considering static equilibrium
Source abstract
Abstract
This research proposes an analytical solution of the nano-concrete-epoxy interaction area within nano crack region of the reinforced concrete beam by applying Newton’s third law in static equilibrium. For deriving the governing equation, the imaginary beam with free ends (no support) is considered within nano crack region. This imaginary beam is acted along the imaginary line of concrete-epoxy interface. Newton’s third law is applicable for deriving the governing equation because of assuming the absence of frictional and other external forces. The parametric study is performed for implementing the proposed formula of nano interactive area considering variable nano crack depths and thicknesses. The nano interactive area is increased gradually with the increment of depths and thicknesses based on the parametric study because of linear functionality of interactive area and geometry of nano crack region. The maximum interactive area is found to be 314 nm 2 at 0.6 ratio of depths and thicknesses of the nano crack. The incremental differences in interactive area between the crack depth or thickness ratios of 0.1 and 0.6 are found to be 25.4% and 1.6% for variations of the crack depth and thickness ratios, respectively. So, the crack depth shows higher impact on the interaction area compared to the thickness of the crack. However, there is a scope for enhancing this research in future by deriving closed-formed analytical formulations to consider appropriate boundary conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Al-Ajaj I, Abd M, Jaffer H. Mechanical properties of micro and nano TiO2/epoxy composites. Int J Min Metall Mech Eng. 2013;1(2):93–7.
2. Büyüköztürk O, Buehler M, Lau D, Tuakta C. Structural solution using molecular dynamics: fundamentals and a case study of epoxy-silica interface. Int J Solids Struct. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.03.018.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.03.018 ↗
3. Forsat M, Badnava S, Mirjavadi S, Barati M, Hamouda A. Small scale effects on transient vibrations of porous FG cylindrical nanoshells based on nonlocal strain gradient theory. Eur Phys J Plus. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-019-00042-x.10.1140/epjp/s13360-019-00042-x ↗
4. Forsat M, Mirjavadi S, Hamouda A. Investigation of the effect of Larestan’s pipeline water on the mechanical properties of concretes containing granite aggregates. Adv Civil Eng. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4197186.10.1155/2019/4197186 ↗
5. Gbadeyan O, Adali S, Bright G, Sithole B. The investigation of reinforcement properties of nano-CaCO3 synthesized from Achatina fulica snail shell through mechanochemical methods on epoxy nanocomposites. Nanocomposites. 2021;7(1):79–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/20550324.2021.1936972.10.1080/20550324.2021.1936972 ↗
6. Guo L, Kitamura T, Yan Y, Sumigawa T, Huang K. Fracture mechanics investigation on crack propagation in the nano-multilayered materials. Int J Solids Struct. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.03.025.10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.03.025 ↗
7. Haque MF. Bi-directional effects on the tunnel-soil-pile interaction under seismic loadings. J GeoEng. 2022;17(3):165–73. https://doi.org/10.6310/jog.202209_17(3).5.10.6310/jog.202209_17(3).5 ↗
8. Haque MF. Analytical solution of Tunnel-Soil-Tunnel (TST) interaction under seismic excitation. Geomech Geoeng. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2023.2300474.10.1080/17486025.2023.2300474 ↗
9. Haque MF. Predicting lateral displacement of sand for mat foundation under simplifed seismic loading. Discover Civil Eng. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44290-024-00001-1.10.1007/s44290-024-00001-1 ↗
10. Haque MF, Ansary MF. Analytical formulations of tunnel–soil–pile interaction under seismic excitations. Earthquake Eng Resilience. 2024;3(1):72–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/eer2.67.10.1002/eer2.67 ↗
11. Horstemeyer M, Farkas D, Kim S, Tang T, Potirniche G. Nanostructurally small cracks (NSC): A review on atomistic modeling of fatigue. Int J Fatigue. 2010;32:1473–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.006.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.01.006 ↗
12. Lau D, Büyüköztürk O. Fracture characterization of concrete/epoxy interface affected by moisture. Mech Mater. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2010.09.001.10.1016/j.mechmat.2010.09.001 ↗
13. Lau D, Broderick K, Buehler M, Büyüköztürk O. A robust nanoscale experimental quantification of fracture energy in a bilayer material system. PNAS. 2014;111(33):11990–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1402893111.10.1073/pnas.1402893111 ↗
14. Lau D, Büyüköztürk O, Buehler M. Characterization of the intrinsic strength between epoxy and silica using a multiscale approach. J Mater Res. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2012.96.10.1557/jmr.2012.96 ↗
15. Lurie S, Belov P. Gradient effects in fracture mechanics for nano-structured materials. Eng Fract Mech. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.07.032.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.07.032 ↗
16. Maio U, Gaetano D, Greco F, Lonetti P, Blasi P, Pranno A. The reinforcing effect of nano-modified epoxy resin on the failure behavior of FRP-Plated RC structures. Buildings. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051139.10.3390/buildings13051139 ↗
17. Mirahmadi H, Azimi M, Mirjavadi S. Calculation of stress intensity factor for functionally graded cylinders with two radial cracks using the weight function method. Theor Appl Fract Mech. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2016.06.004.10.1016/j.tafmec.2016.06.004 ↗
18. Mirjavadi S, Afshari B, Barati M, Hamouda A. Transient response of porous inhomogeneous nanobeams due to various impulsive loads based on nonlocal strain gradient elasticity. Int J Mech Mater Des. 2020;16:57–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-019-09452-2.10.1007/s10999-019-09452-2 ↗
19. Mirjavadi S, Forsat M, Barati M, Khan I. Analysis of post-buckling of higher-order graphene oxide reinforced concrete plates with geometrical imperfection. Adv Concrete Construct. 2020;9(4):397–406. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2020.9.4.397.10.12989/acc.2020.9.4.397 ↗
20. Mirjavadi S, Forsat M, Barati M, Khan I. Finite element based post-buckling analysis of refined graphene oxide reinforced concrete beams with geometrical imperfection. Comput Concrete. 2020;25(4):283–91. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2020.25.4.283.10.12989/cac.2020.25.4.283 ↗
21. Sahar N, Hong S-I, Kohn D. Micro- and nano-structural analyses of damage in bone. Micron. 2005;36:617–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2005.07.006.10.1016/j.micron.2005.07.006 ↗
22. Tuakta C, Büyüköztürk O. Conceptual model for prediction of FRP-concrete bond strength under moisture cycles. J Compos Constr. 2011;15(5):743–56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000210.10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000210 ↗
23. Yazman Ş, Uyaner M, Karabörk F, Akdemir A. Effects of nano reinforcing/matrix interaction on chemical, thermal and mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. J Compos Mater. 2021;55(28):4257–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219983211037059.10.1177/00219983211037059 ↗
24. Yousri O, Abdellatif M, Bassioni G. Effect of Al2O3 Nanoparticles on the mechanical and physical properties of epoxy composite. Arab J Sci Eng. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-017-2955-7.10.1007/s13369-017-2955-7 ↗
25. Zhou H, Liu H-Y, Zhou H, Zhang Y, Gao X, Mai Y-W. On adhesive properties of nano-silica/epoxy bonded single-lap joints. Mater Design. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.055.10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.055 ↗
26. Zhou Y, Zhang J, Zhang R, Liu E, Xue X, Xing X, Zhang Q. Effect of nano-Al2O3/epoxy resin composite on the shear strength recovery of fractured rock masses with various crack widths and SCA interfacial treatments. Case Stud Const Mater. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01715.10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01715 ↗