Investigation of thermal conductivity for nano-improved polyethylene glycol composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurate prediction of thermal conductivity in (nano-PEG) composites is essential for accelerating thermal management material design. This study develops a hybrid Random Forest (RF) framework optimized using eight evolutionary algorithms, including (PSO), (GA), (WOA), (GWO), (CSA), (FPA), (FA), and (BA). A dataset of 229 experimental observations was used to model thermal conductivity as a function of temperature, PEG molecular weight, nanoparticle concentration, and nanoparticle form. Among evaluated models, the Bat Algorithm-optimized RF (RF-BA) achieved highest predictive efficiency with R 2 = 0.995406, MSE = 0.000196, and AARE = 1.291%, while the PSO-optimized model (RF-PSO) demonstrated the fastest optimization runtime (96.9 s) with competitive accuracy. Correlation and SHAP analyses revealed nanoparticle concentration as the dominant factor governing thermal conductivity (correlation coefficient = 0.75), followed by PEG molecular weight (0.56), temperature (0.33), and nanoparticle form (0.24). The results demonstrate that evolutionarily optimized ensemble learning provides a reliable and computationally efficient strategy for thermophysical property prediction in nano-PEG composites, offering a practical alternative to extensive experimental characterization.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal properties of materials · Composite Material Mechanics · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (78)
Show source-provided references
1. Sharma R, et al. Developments in organic solid–liquid phase change materials and their applications in thermal energy storage. Energy Convers Manag. 2015;95:193–228.10.1016/j.enconman.2015.01.084 ↗
2. Zhang C et al, Mechanical responses and microscopic irreversible deformation evolution of thermoplastic fiber-reinforced composites under cyclic loading. International Journal of Fatigue, 2025: p. 109327.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.109327 ↗
3. Chen J, Wang D, Fu J. Stiff yet tough, moisture-tolerant, room temperature self-healing and thermoconductive biomimetic nanocomposites. Adv Mater Weinh. 2025;37(42):e07548.10.1002/adma.202507548 ↗
4. Mettawee E-BS, Assassa GM. Experimental study of a compact PCM solar collector. Energy Oxford. 2006;31(14):2958–68.10.1016/j.energy.2005.11.019 ↗
5. Li, X., et al., Hydroxyl-Rich Hyperbranched Polyglycerol Additive for Low-Temperature Aqueous Zinc Batteries: Sustained and Efficient Dehydration and High-Conductivity. Advanced Science, 2025: p. e16639.10.1002/advs.202516639 ↗
6. Ye H, et al. The performance evaluation of shape-stabilized phase change materials in building applications using energy saving index. Appl Energy. 2014;113:1118–26.10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.08.067 ↗
7. Xu B, Li P, Chan C. Application of phase change materials for thermal energy storage in concentrated solar thermal power plants: a review to recent developments. Appl Energy. 2015;160:286–307.10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.016 ↗
8. Tu, C., et al., Engineered thermal conduction pathways in high-performance flexible PEG phase-change composites enabling efficient thermal storage and thermoelectric conversion. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2026: p. 172574.10.1016/j.cej.2026.172574 ↗
9. Farid MM, et al. A review on phase change energy storage: materials and applications. Energy Convers Manag. 2004;45(9–10):1597–615.10.1016/j.enconman.2003.09.015 ↗
10. Ling Z, et al. Thermal conductivity of an organic phase change material/expanded graphite composite across the phase change temperature range and a novel thermal conductivity model. Energy Convers Manag. 2015;102:202–8.10.1016/j.enconman.2014.11.040 ↗
11. Sun G, et al. Valorization of PET waste via glycolysis-derived polyol into high performance polyurethane-modified asphalt: performance optimization and sustainability assessment. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2026.104287.10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2026.104287 ↗
12. Minea AA. State of the art in PEG-based heat transfer fluids and their suspensions with nanoparticles. Nanomaterials Basel. 2021;11(1):86.10.3390/nano11010086 ↗
13. Tang B, Qiu M, Zhang S. Thermal conductivity enhancement of PEG/SiO2 composite PCM by in situ Cu doping. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2012;105:242–8.10.1016/j.solmat.2012.06.012 ↗
14. Wang W, et al. Enhanced thermal conductivity and thermal performance of form-stable composite phase change materials by using β-Aluminum nitride. Appl Energy. 2009;86(7–8):1196–200.10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.10.020 ↗
15. Chereches M, et al. Thermal conductivity of stabilized PEG 400 based nanofluids: An experimental approach. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2022;130:105798.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105798 ↗
16. Singh R, Sadeghi S, Shabani B. Thermal conductivity enhancement of phase change materials for low-temperature thermal energy storage applications. Energies. 2018;12(1):75.10.3390/en12010075 ↗
17. Liu Z, et al. Novel light–driven CF/PEG/SiO2 composite phase change materials with high thermal conductivity. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2018;174:538–44.10.1016/j.solmat.2017.09.045 ↗
18. Marcos MA, et al. MWCNT in PEG-400 nanofluids for thermal applications: A chemical, physical and thermal approach. J Mol Liq. 2019;294:111616.10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111616 ↗
19. Marcos MA, et al. PEG 400-based phase change materials nano-enhanced with functionalized graphene nanoplatelets. Nanomaterials. 2017;8(1):16.10.3390/nano8010016 ↗
20. Marcos MA, et al. NePCM based on silver dispersions in poly (ethylene glycol) as a stable solution for thermal storage. Nanomaterials. 2019;10(1):19.10.3390/nano10010019 ↗
21. Cabaleiro D, et al. Thermal and physical characterization of PEG phase change materials enhanced by carbon-based nanoparticles. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(6):1168.10.3390/nano10061168 ↗
22. Qian T, Li J, Feng W. Single-walled carbon nanotube for shape stabilization and enhanced phase change heat transfer of polyethylene glycol phase change material. Energy Convers Manag. 2017;143:96–108.10.1016/j.enconman.2017.03.065 ↗
23. Tang B, et al. PEG/SiO2–Al2O3 hybrid form-stable phase change materials with enhanced thermal conductivity. Mater Chem Phys. 2014;144(1–2):162–7.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.12.036 ↗
24. Tang B, et al. A full-band sunlight-driven carbon nanotube/PEG/SiO2 composites for solar energy storage. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2014;123:7–12.10.1016/j.solmat.2013.12.022 ↗
25. Huang Y, et al. Ultra-stable phase change coatings constructed from dynamic boron ester crosslinked polymers and lipophilic MWCNTs. Chem Eng J. 2025;508:161033.10.1016/j.cej.2025.161033 ↗
26. Liu Y, et al. Effect of amino functional groups on the thermal properties of stearic acid/UiO-66 composite phase change materials: experimental and molecular dynamics simulations. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 2025;239:126606.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2024.126606 ↗
27. Liu Y, et al. Polyethylene glycol/melamine foam composite phase change materials modified by CdS/Ag exhibits high photothermal conversion performance. Desalination. 2024;585:117783.10.1016/j.desal.2024.117783 ↗
28. Niknejadi M, et al. An experimental study on the cooling efficiency of magnetite–water nanofluid in a twisted tube exposed to a rotating magnetic field. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2021;146(4):1893–909.10.1007/s10973-020-10180-5 ↗
29. Farahmand M, et al. Improving the thermal properties of water by adding MWCNTs, cerium oxide, and MgO hybrid nanoparticles at different temperatures and volume fraction of nanoparticles: experimental investigation. Results Eng. 2024;24:103307.10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103307 ↗
30. Esfe, M.H., et al., Combined Convection in a Lid-Driven Cavity with an Inside Obstacle Subjected to Al 2 O 3-Water Nanofluid: Effect of Solid Volume Fraction and Nanofluid Variable Properties. Acta Physica Polonica: A, 2013. 124(4).10.12693/APhysPolA.124.665 ↗
31. Xiaohong D, et al. Statistical estimation the thermal conductivity of MWCNTs-SiO2/Water-EG nanofluid using the ridge regression method. Physica A. 2020;537:122782.10.1016/j.physa.2019.122782 ↗
32. Mahmoodi M, et al. Free convection of a nanofluid in a square cavity with a heat source on the bottom wall and partially cooled from sides. Therm Sci. 2014;18(suppl. 2):283–300.10.2298/TSCI110406011A ↗
33. Pourrajab R, Behbahani M, Mansouri R. Experimental investigation of synergistic thermal conductivity enhancement in water-based hybrid nanofluids with Copper and Boron Nitride nanoparticles: R. Pourrajab et al. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2025;150(10):8015–27.10.1007/s10973-025-14240-6 ↗
34. Pourrajab R, Noghrehabadi A, Behbahani M. Development of Cu/mesoporous SBA-15 nanocomposite in ethylene glycol for thermal conductivity enhancement: heat transfer applications. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer. 2020;119:104931.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104931 ↗
35. Pourrajab R, Noghrehabadi A, Behbahani M. Thermo-hydraulic performance of mesoporous silica with Cu nanoparticles in helically grooved tube. Appl Therm Eng. 2021;185:116436.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.116436 ↗
36. Hamid KA, et al. Experimental investigation of thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity on nanoparticle mixture ratios of TiO2-SiO2 nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 2018;116:1143–52.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.09.087 ↗
37. Heris SZ, Etemad SG, Esfahany MN. Experimental investigation of oxide nanofluids laminar flow convective heat transfer. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2006;33(4):529–35.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2006.01.005 ↗
38. Pang Y, et al. Machine learning algorithm optimization for intelligent prediction of rock thermal conductivity: a case study from a whole-cored scientific drilling borehole. Geothermics. 2023;111:102711.10.1016/j.geothermics.2023.102711 ↗
39. Deymi O, et al. Employing ensemble learning techniques for modeling nanofluids’ specific heat capacity. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2023;143:106684.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.106684 ↗
40. Çolak AB, Bayrak M. Comparison of experimental thermal conductivity of water-based Al2O3–Cu hybrid nanofluid with theoretical models and artificial neural network output. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2025;150(4):2865–80.10.1007/s10973-024-13617-3 ↗
41. Çolak AB, Bayrak M. A novel machine learning study: maximizing the efficiency of parabolic trough solar collectors with engine oil-based Copper and Silver nanofluids. Heat Transfer Res. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1615/heattransres.2024053037.10.1615/heattransres.2024053037 ↗
42. Sun Z, et al. Application and development of smart thermally conductive fiber materials. Nanomaterials. 2024;14(2):154.10.3390/nano14020154 ↗
43. Oni O, et al. Development of polymer gel for severely fractured geothermal systems. Processes. 2025;13(11):3632.10.3390/pr13113632 ↗
44. Deymi O, et al. On the evaluation of mono-nanofluids’ density using a radial basis function neural network optimized by evolutionary algorithms. Therm Sci Eng Prog. 2024;53:102750.10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102750 ↗
45. Minea AA, Cherecheş EI. A comparative study on thermal behavior of PEG 400 and two oxide nanocolloids. Therm Sci Eng Prog. 2024;55:102968.10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102968 ↗
46. Kou Y, et al. Thermal analysis and heat capacity study of polyethylene glycol (PEG) phase change materials for thermal energy storage applications. J Chem Thermodyn. 2019;128:259–74.10.1016/j.jct.2018.08.031 ↗
47. Liu Y, et al. Application of machine learning in predicting the thermal conductivity of single-filler polymer composites. Mater Today Commun. 2024;39:109116.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109116 ↗
48. Mohammadi M-R, et al. Modeling residue formation from crude oil oxidation using tree-based machine learning approaches. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):26264.10.1038/s41598-025-10012-2 ↗
49. Belgiu M, Drăguţ L. Random forest in remote sensing: a review of applications and future directions. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2016;114:24–31.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011 ↗
50. Cutler, A., D.R. Cutler, and J.R. Stevens, Random forests. Ensemble machine learning: Methods and applications, 2012: p. 157–175.10.1007/978-1-4419-9326-7_5 ↗
51. Larestani A, et al. Compositional modeling of the oil formation volume factor of crude oil systems: application of intelligent models and equations of state. ACS Omega. 2022;7(28):24256–73.10.1021/acsomega.2c01466 ↗
52. Mohammadi M-R, et al. Enhancing predictions of coal strength variations induced by CO2 exposure through advanced deep learning and machine learning techniques. Fuel. 2026;407:137210.10.1016/j.fuel.2025.137210 ↗
53. Houssein EH, et al. Major advances in particle swarm optimization: theory, analysis, and application. Swarm Evol Comput. 2021;63:100868.10.1016/j.swevo.2021.100868 ↗
54. Kennedy, J. and R. Eberhart. Particle swarm optimization. ieee.
55. Mathew, T.V., Genetic algorithm. Report submitted at IIT Bombay, 2012. 53.
56. Holland JH. Genetic algorithms. Sci Am. 1992;267(1):66–73.10.1038/scientificamerican0792-66 ↗
57. Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A. Grey wolf optimizer. Adv Eng Softw. 2014;69:46–61.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007 ↗
58. Rezaei H, Bozorg-Haddad O, Chu X. Grey wolf optimization (GWO) algorithm. In: Advanced optimization by nature-inspired algorithms. 2018. p. 81–91.
59. Mirjalili S, Lewis A. The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw. 2016;95:51–67.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008 ↗
60. Rana N, et al. Whale optimization algorithm: a systematic review of contemporary applications, modifications and developments. Neural Comput Appl. 2020;32:16245–77.10.1007/s00521-020-04849-z ↗
61. Yang X-S, S. Deb. Cuckoo search via Lévy flights. Ieee.
62. Gandomi AH, Yang X-S, Alavi AH. Cuckoo search algorithm: a metaheuristic approach to solve structural optimization problems. Eng Comput. 2013;29:17–35.10.1007/s00366-011-0241-y ↗
63. Yang X-S. Flower pollination algorithm for global optimization. Springer.
64. Awan MMA, Awan MJ. Adapted flower pollination algorithm for a standalone solar photovoltaic system. Mehran University Research Journal Of Engineering & Technology. 2022;41(4):118–27.10.22581/muet1982.2204.12 ↗
65. Yang X-S. Firefly algorithm, stochastic test functions and design optimisation. Int J Bio Inspired Comput. 2010;2(2):78–84.10.1504/IJBIC.2010.032124 ↗
66. Alyasseri ZAA, et al. Recent advances of bat-inspired algorithm, its versions and applications. Neural Comput Appl. 2022;34(19):16387–422.10.1007/s00521-022-07662-y ↗
67. Xiao C, et al. Strong and tough multilayer heterogeneous pyrocarbon based composites. Adv Func Mater. 2024;34(51):2409881.10.1002/adfm.202409881 ↗
68. Naghizadeh A, et al. Modeling thermal conductivity of hydrogen-based binary gaseous mixtures using generalized regression neural network. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2024;59:242–50.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.216 ↗
69. Liu X, et al. Accurate modeling of nano-enhanced polyethylene glycol thermal conductivity using soft computing methods: application to thermal energy storage. Int J Polym Anal Charact. 2025;30(4):457–84.10.1080/1023666X.2025.2477557 ↗
70. Liu B, et al. Stochastic interpretable machine learning based multiscale modeling in thermal conductivity of polymeric graphene-enhanced composites. Compos Struct. 2024;327:117601.10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117601 ↗
71. Ivorra-Martinez J, et al. Development of P (3HB-co-3HHx) nanohydroxyapatite (nHA) composites for scaffolds manufacturing by means of fused deposition modeling. International Journal of Bioprinting. 2023;10(1):0156.10.36922/ijb.0156 ↗
72. Zhan Z, et al. Effect of in situ polymerization on the thermal stability and enthalpy properties of wood-based composites based on graphene oxide-modified phase change microcapsule. Polym Compos. 2025;46(16):15342–56.10.1002/pc.30133 ↗
73. Thummalapalli SV, et al. Machine learning–enabled direct ink writing of conductive polymer composites for enhanced performance in thermal management and current protection. Energy Storage Materials. 2024;71:103670.10.1016/j.ensm.2024.103670 ↗
74. Lv Q, et al. Modeling thermo-physical properties of hydrogen utilizing machine learning schemes: viscosity, density, diffusivity, and thermal conductivity. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2024;72:1127–42.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.280 ↗
75. Akilu S, et al. Machine learning analysis of thermophysical and thermohydraulic properties in ethylene glycol-and glycerol-based SiO2 nanofluids. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):14829.10.1038/s41598-024-65411-8 ↗
76. Varughese JJ, Ms S. Influence of silane and polyethylene glycol functionalization of boron nitride nanosheets on mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy nanocomposites: machine and deep learning forecasting. Polym Compos. 2025;46(3):2190–208.10.1002/pc.29098 ↗
77. Chen L, et al. Microstructural evolution in graphene nanoplatelets reinforced magnesium matrix composites fabricated through thixomolding process. J Alloys Compd. 2023;940:168824.10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.168824 ↗
78. Wang Y, et al. Friction behavior of biodegradable electrospun polyester nanofibrous membranes. Tribol Int. 2023;188:108891.10.1016/j.triboint.2023.108891 ↗