Preparation of hexagonal iron flakes with a hexagonal structure on the sublayer of copper oxides
Source abstract
Abstract
The stabilization of hexagonal close-packed (hcp) iron at ambient conditions remains a significant challenge due to its metastable nature. Here, we report a novel and facile strategy for templating the epitaxial growth of hcp-Fe flakes using tailored copper oxide sublayers. By simply varying the sublayer annealing temperature, we achieved precise control over the iron morphology, obtaining uniform hexagonal hcp-Fe flakes on optimally prepared surfaces. Structural analysis confirms the successful stabilization of hcp-Fe, revealing a coherent epitaxial relationship between hcp-Fe(002) and CuO(− 112). Crucially, the stabilized hcp-Fe exhibits antiferromagnetic ordering, as demonstrated by vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM) and density functional theory (DFT) calculations, contrasting the ferromagnetism of bulk bcc-Fe. This work provides a facile and scalable pathway to synthesize and study hcp-Fe without extreme pressures, offering substantial potential for fundamental geophysical research and applications in antiferromagnetic spintronics and catalysis. Novel room-temperature synthesis of hcp-Fe flakes on tailored CuO sublayers Coherent epitaxy revealed between hcp-Fe(002) and CuO(− 112) via XRD First-time stabilization of antiferromagnetic hcp-Fe at ambient pressure
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Boehler R. High-pressure experiments and the phase diagram of lower mantle and core materials. Rev Geophys. 2000;38:221. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998RG000053.10.1029/1998RG000053 ↗
2. Wright JG. Ferromagnetism in epitaxial F.C.C. iron films. Philosoph Mag: J Theor Exp Appl Phys. 1971;24:217. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786437108227381.10.1080/14786437108227381 ↗
3. Bancroft D, Peterson EL, Minshall S. Polymorphism of iron at high pressure. J Appi Phys. 1957;27:291. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1722359.10.1063/1.1722359 ↗
4. Manghnani M H, iko Syono Y h. High-Pressure Research in Mineral Physics, 1987, Scientific Publishing, Tokyo, In Press.
5. Wang F, Yang Z, Li F, Shao JL, Xu LC. Ab initio investigation of electronic structure and magnetic transformation during the bcc to hcp transition in Fe induced by pressure. Mater Today Commun. 2024;39:109406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109406.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109406 ↗
6. Guo XX, Jiang DD, Shao JL. Threshold and structure of HCP/FCC nucleation in BCC iron under arbitrary triaxial compression: atomistic simulation. Mech Mater. 2024;192:104977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2024.104977.10.1016/j.mechmat.2024.104977 ↗
7. Deluigi OR, Bringa EM. Mechanical properties of hcp Fe at high pressures and temperatures from large-scale molecular dynamics simulations. J Appl Phys. 2024;136:195901. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0238266.10.1063/5.0238266 ↗
8. Smirnov GS, Peil OE, Ruban AV, Simak SI, Belonoshko AB. Impact of magnetism on Fe phase diagram under extreme conditions. Phys Rev Mater. 2025;9:L040601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.9.L040601.10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.9.L040601 ↗
9. Wang S, Chen S, Qi X, Xu M, Yu T, Wang Y, et al. Sound velocities of Stishovite at simultaneous high pressure and high temperature suggest an eclogite-rich layer beneath the Hawaii hotspot. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth. 2024;129:e2023JB027979. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107700.10.1029/2023GL107700 ↗
10. Park Y, Wakamatsu T, Azuma S, Nishihara Y, Ohta K. Characterization of the lattice preferred orientation of hcp iron transformed from the single-crystal bcc phase in situ at high pressures up to 80 GPa. Phys Chem Miner. 2024;51:31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00269-024-01293-6.10.1007/s00269-024-01293-6 ↗
11. White S, et al. Time-dependent effects in melting and phase change for laser-shocked iron. Phys Rev Res. 2020;2:033366. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033366.10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033366 ↗
12. Takahashi T, Bassett WA. High-pressure polymorph of iron. Science. 1964;145:483. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.145.3631.483.10.1126/science.145.3631.483 ↗
13. Bundy FP. Pressure—temperature phase diagram of iron to 200 kbar, 900°C. J Appl Phys. 1965;36:616. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1714038.10.1063/1.1714038 ↗
14. Sanchez JP, Ravet MF, Piecuch M, et al. Magnetism and structure of hexagonal Fe in Fe/Ru superlattices. Hyperfine Interact. 1990;57:2077. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02405766.10.1007/BF02405766 ↗
15. Fu LS, Jiang JT, Xu CY, Zhen L. Synthesis of hexagonal Fe microflakes with excellent microwave absorption performance. CrystEngComm. 2012;14(20):6827. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CE25836F.10.1039/C2CE25836F ↗
16. Madej E, Maroszek NK, Freindl K, Korecki J, Mlłynczak E, Slęzak DW, et al. Interfacial chemistry meets magnetism: comparison of Co/Fe3O4 and Co/α-Fe2O3 epitaxial heterostructures. Appl Surf Sci. 2025;703:163379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.163379.10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.163379 ↗
17. Shen J, Ohresser P, Mohan ChV, Klaua M, Barthel J, Kirschner J. Magnetic moment of fcc Fe(111) ultrathin films by ultrafast deposition on Cu(111). Phys Rev Lett. 1998;80:1980. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1980.10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.1980 ↗
18. Shen J, Klaua M, Ohresser P, Jenniches H, Barthel J, Mohan CV, et al. Structural and magnetic phase transitions of Fe on stepped Cu(111). Phys Rev B. 1997;56:11134. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.56.11134.10.1103/PhysRevB.56.11134 ↗
19. Biedermann A, Rupp W, Schmid M, Varga P. Coexistence of fcc- and bcc-like crystal structures in ultrathin Fe films grown on Cu(111). Phys Rev B. 2006;73:165418. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.165418.10.1103/PhysRevB.73.165418 ↗
20. Szunyogh L, Újfalussy B, Weinberger P. Magnetic structure and anisotropy in Fe/Cu(001) over- and interlayers with antiferromagnetic interlayer coupling. Phys Rev B. 1997;55:14392. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.55.14392.10.1103/PhysRevB.55.14392 ↗
21. Vanithakumari SC, Shinde SL, Nanda KK. Controlled synthesis of CuO nanostructures on Cu foil, rod and grid. Mater Sci Eng B Solid-State Mater. 2011;176:669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2011.02.013.10.1016/j.mseb.2011.02.013 ↗
22. Shi J, Qiao L, Zhao Y, Sun Z, Feng W, Zhang Z, et al. Synergistic effects on thermal growth of CuO nanowires. J Alloys Compd. 2020;815:152355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152355.10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.152355 ↗
23. Anand AM, Raj A, Salam JA, Adithya NR, Jayakrishnan R. Photoconductivity in self-assembled CuO thin films. Mater Renew Sustain Energy. 2024;13:45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40243-023-00250-7.10.1007/s40243-023-00250-7 ↗
24. Morariu MI, Nicolaescu M, Hulka L, Teanu ND, Orha C, Lăzău C, et al. Fabrication of Cu2O/CuO nanowires by one-step thermal oxidation of flexible copper mesh for supercapacitor applications. Batteries. 2024;10:246. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10070246.10.3390/batteries10070246 ↗
25. Steinle-Neumann G, Stixrude L, Cohen RE. Magnetism in dense hexagonal iron. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(1):34.10.1073/pnas.2237239100 ↗
26. Gao D, Zhang Z, Yang Z, Xue D. Interface mediated ferromagnetism in bulk CuO/Cu2O composites citation. Appl Phys Lett. 2012;101:132416. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4755766.10.1063/1.4755766 ↗
27. Zúñiga A, Fonseca L, Souza JA, Rivaldo-Gomez C, Díaz Pomar C, Criado D. Anomalous ferromagnetic behavior and size effects in CuO nanowires. J Magnetism Magnetic Mater. 2019;471:77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.09.048.10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.09.048 ↗