Entropy optimized magneto-thermo-diffusive transport in a chemically reactive unsteady third grade nanofluid flow over a stretching surface using a Cattaneo–Christov framework with artificial neural network modeling
Source abstract
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigates the complex magneto-thermo-diffusive transport and entropy generation characteristics in unsteady third-grade nanofluid flow over a stretching surface, driven by the need for accurate prediction of mixed convective heat-mass transfer mechanisms in advanced thermal systems. This work aims to quantify how magnetohydrodynamic behavior under the simultaneous influences of Cattaneo-Christov heat and mass diffusion, viscous dissipation, thermal radiation, nonuniform heat generation/absorption, Brownian motion, thermophoresis, and activation energy influences thermal performance within the Buongiorno nanofluid framework. The governing nonlinear partial differential equations are transformed into non-dimensional ordinary forms and solved numerically via a fourth-order Runge-Kutta method integrated with the shooting algorithm. To enhance predictive fidelity, the resulting datasets are trained through advanced ANN algorithms, and model accuracy is verified using regression metrics, error histograms, and mean square error analysis. The obtained graphical results evaluations reveal that intensified magnetic field intensity and unsteadiness significantly suppress fluid velocity, whereas thermal radiation, Eckert number, Brownian motion, and thermophoretic diffusion substantially enhance heat transport. Entropy generation increases significantly with higher Brinkman and radiation parameters. Quantitatively, increasing radiation parameter from 0.2 to 1.0 elevates the Nusselt number by 14.28%, while higher activation energy parameter from 0.5 to 2.0 suppresses the thermal transport rate by 12.63% and amplifying the mass transfer rate by 29.9%. The ANN framework achieves superior predictive accuracy and computational stability, enabling a robust platform for optimizing thermal systems and supporting advanced biomedical diagnostics such as early stage cancer detection and tumor classification.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer · Heat Transfer and Optimization · Thermal properties of materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Choi SUS. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. Argonne: Argonne National Lab. (ANL); 1995. pp. 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE1995-092610.1115/IMECE1995-0926 ↗
2. Fosdick FL, Rajagopal KR. Thermodynamics and stability of fluids of third grade. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci. 1980;369:351–77. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1980.0005.10.1098/rspa.1980.0005 ↗
3. Rajagopal KR, Na TY, Gupta AS. Flow of a viscoelastic fluid over a stretching sheet. Rheol Acta. 1984;23:213–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01332078.10.1007/BF01332078 ↗
4. Asiri F, Mumtaz MA, Abbasi sarwar N, Haldar B, Eshchanov T, Sardor S. Third-grade fluid flow over a stretching sheet under Lorentz force and thermal radiation: parametric continuation algorithm. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2025;18:101880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101880.10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101880 ↗
5. Khan I, Zulkifli R, Chinyoka T, Ling Z, Ahmad Z. Transient gravity-driven flow of a third-grade fluid (TGF) on an inclined plane with non-isothermal effects, exothermic reactions, and porous medium influence. ZAMM J Appl Math Mech. 2025;105:e202300822. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.202300822.10.1002/zamm.202300822 ↗
6. Das S, Mazumder BS, Mondal KK. Multidimensional transport process of solute in a hydromagnetic third-grade fluid flowing through a channel: an approach of method of moments. Phys Fluids. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0289599.10.1063/5.0289599 ↗
7. Sindhu S, Gireesha BJ. Scrutinization of unsteady non-Newtonian fluid flow considering buoyancy effect and thermal radiation: tangent hyperbolic model. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2022;135:106062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.106062.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.106062 ↗
8. Mandal IC, Mukhopadhyay S, Mandal MS. MHD mixed convective Maxwell liquid flow passing an unsteady stretched sheet. Partial Differ Equ Appl Math. 2024;9:100644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100644.10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100644 ↗
9. Aarathi T, Subramanyam Reddy A, Jagadeshkumar K, Ramachandra Prasad V, Beg OA. Entropy generation in a chemically reactive magnetohydrodynamic unsteady micropolar nanofluid flow with activation energy over an inclined stretching sheet: a Buongiorno model approach. Proc Inst Mech Eng E J Process Mech Eng. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089241272900.10.1177/09544089241272900 ↗
10. Moyes M, Anala SR. Entropy generation and mixed convection heat transfer analysis in MHD-driven third-grade (CuO + Fe3 O4/blood) hybrid nanofluid flow over a stretching sheet influenced by thermal radiation and a non-uniform heat source/sink. Multiscale Multidiscip Model Exp Des. 2025;8:389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41939-025-00976-z.10.1007/s41939-025-00976-z ↗
11. Sajid T, Bilal M, Altamirano GC. Cattaneo–Christov model for cross nanofluid with Soret and Dufour effects under endothermic/exothermic reactions: a modified Buongiorno tetra-hybrid nanofluid approach. ZAMM J Appl Math Mech. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.202300044.10.1002/zamm.202300044 ↗
12. Thenmozhi D, Rao ME, Reddy BN, Arthy J, Jawad M, Bognar G, et al. Influence of Stefan blowing on the flow and heat transfer of non-Newtonian Jeffrey nanofluid over an unsteady stretching sheet. Results Eng. 2025;26:105375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105375.10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105375 ↗
13. Christov CI. On frame indifferent formulation of the Maxwell–Cattaneo model of finite-speed heat conduction. Mech Res Commun. 2009;36:481–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2008.11.003.10.1016/j.mechrescom.2008.11.003 ↗
14. Shankar U, Naduvinamani NB, Basha H. A generalized perspective of Fourier and Fick’s laws: magnetized effects of Cattaneo–Christov models on transient nanofluid flow between two parallel plates with Brownian motion and thermophoresis. Nonlinear Eng. 2020;9:201–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/nleng-2020-0009.10.1515/nleng-2020-0009 ↗
15. Hamad NH, Bilal M, Ali A, Eldin SM, Sharaf M, Rahman MU. Energy transfer through third-grade fluid flow across an inclined stretching sheet subject to thermal radiation and Lorentz force. Sci Rep. 2023;13:19643. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-46428-x.10.1038/s41598-023-46428-x ↗
16. Aziz S, Khan SU, Adnan AI, Waqas M, Sajjad RD, Riaz A, et al. A revised double diffusion Cattaneo–Christov bioconvective model for unsteady Williamson nanofluid due to Riga surface with additional nonlinear thermal sources. ZAMM J Appl Math Mech. 2024;104:e202400225. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.202400225.10.1002/zamm.202400225 ↗
17. Eswaramoorthi S, Nasir S, Loganathan K, Gupta MS, Berrouk A. Numerical simulation of rotating flow of CNT nanofluids with thermal radiation, ohmic heating, and autocatalytic chemical reactions. Alex Eng J. 2025;113:535–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.10.124.10.1016/j.aej.2024.10.124 ↗
18. Nasir S, Berrouk A, Aamir A. Exploring nanoparticle dynamics in binary chemical reactions within magnetized porous media: a computational analysis. Sci Rep. 2024;14:25505. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76757-4.10.1038/s41598-024-76757-4 ↗
19. Habib S, Nasir S, Khan Z, Berrouk AS, Islam S, Aamir A. Modeling of chemically reactive fluid dynamics with thermal effect and energy source through a magnetized medium. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2025;150:4631–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-025-14031-z.10.1007/s10973-025-14031-z ↗
20. Reddy MV, Ajithkumar M, Ali F, Reddy KV, Khan U. Entropy optimization in magneto nonlinear mixed convective flow of Ree–Eyring nanofluid with activation energy and gyrotactic microorganisms. J Nonlinear Math Phys. 2025;32:47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44198-025-00300-w.10.1007/s44198-025-00300-w ↗
21. Kumar RM, Srinivasa Raju R, Venkateswarlu B, Anil KM. Influence of cross-diffusion and activation energy on MHD Williamson nanofluid flow over a nonlinear stretching sheet. Numer Heat Transf B Fundam. 2025;86:3195–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407790.2024.2355569.10.1080/10407790.2024.2355569 ↗
22. Hussein SA, Arafa AAM, Elshekhipy A, Hassan Almalki N, AL-Essa L, Akbar Y, Radiative and dissipative MHD Eyring-Powell nanofluid bioconvective flow through peristaltic waves in the presence of bilateral chemical reaction with Arrhenius activation energy: entropy optimization. Numer Heat Transf A Appl. 2025;86:2569–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2023.2292199.10.1080/10407782.2023.2292199 ↗
23. Madan Kumar R, Srinivasa Raju R, Kumar MA, Venkateswarlu B. A numerical study of thermal and diffusion effects on MHD Jeffrey fluid flow over a porous stretching sheet with activation energy. Numer Heat Transf A Appl. 2025;86:4423–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407782.2024.2319344.10.1080/10407782.2024.2319344 ↗
24. Josuva J, Reddy RH. Pulsatile hydromagnetic Carreau–Yasuda nanofluid flow in a nonlinearly radiated inclined porous channel with nonuniform heat source/sink: entropy analysis. ZAMM J Appl Math Mech. 2025;105:e70092. https://doi.org/10.1002/zamm.70092.10.1002/zamm.70092 ↗
25. Bejan A. A Study of entropy generation in fundamental convective heat transfer. J Heat Transf. 1979;101:718–25. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3451063.10.1115/1.3451063 ↗
26. Loganathan K, Mohana K, Mohanraj M, Sakthivel P, Rajan S. Impact of third-grade nanofluid flow across a convective surface in the presence of inclined Lorentz force: an approach to entropy optimization. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2021;144:1935–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-09751-3.10.1007/s10973-020-09751-3 ↗
27. Olkha A, Kumar M, Meena SK. Effects of heat transport characteristics and chemical reaction in unsteady flow of Williamson fluid and entropy generation: the Keller–Box numerical scheme. Heat Transf. 2025;54:2218–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.23287.10.1002/htj.23287 ↗
28. Kumar A, Sharma BK, Sharma M, Almohsen B, Sarris IE. Entropy generation optimization for Casson hybrid nanofluid flow along a curved surface with bioconvection mechanism and exothermic/endothermic catalytic reaction. Adv Theory Simul. 2025;8:2401554. https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.202401554.10.1002/adts.202401554 ↗
29. Rahman MU, Haq F, Ghazwani HA, Younis J, Ghazwani MH, Alnujaie A, et al. Physical aspects of entropy generation in magnetized mixed convection Sutterby nanoliquid flow with chemical reaction. Int J Energy Res. 2025;2025:9310834. https://doi.org/10.1155/er/9310834.10.1155/er/9310834 ↗
30. Rehman AU, Khan MI. Advanced computational intelligence approach for heat transfer and entropy generation in non-Newtonian third grade magnetohydrodynamics peristaltic transport through asymmetric channels. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2025;169:109947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2025.109947.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2025.109947 ↗
31. Nandini M, Hanumagowda BN, Saini G, Varma SVK, Tawade JV, Satpute NV, et al. Non-linear thermal radiation impacts on MHD nanofluid flow in a rotating channel with Darcy–Forccheimer model: An entropy analysis. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2025;18:101228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2024.101228.10.1016/j.jrras.2024.101228 ↗
32. Ullah Z, Alam MM, El-Zahar ER, Shahab S, Abu-Zinadah H, Seddek LF, et al. Wave oscillation in periodic-boundary layers and turbulent heat flow using Powell–Eyring nanofluid, nonlinear radiation and entropy generation via finite-difference method. Chaos Solitons Fract. 2025;196:116446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116446.10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116446 ↗
33. Chakraborty A, Khan U, Elrashidi A, Alsubaie BMT, Abdalla M. Entropy and back-propagation analysis of Ag+MgO/Water hybrid nanofluid flow over a radially stretching disk: response optimization and sensitivity analysis. Alex Eng J. 2025;117:116–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.12.108.10.1016/j.aej.2024.12.108 ↗
34. Aruna J, Niranjan H. Modeling the effects of gyrotactic microbes in membrane bioreactor systems for micropollutant removal from sewer water: ANN and statistical-based optimization review. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2025;169:109826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2025.109826.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2025.109826 ↗
35. Shah NA, Masood K, Zeeshan DN. Artificial neural network estimation for heated convective Carreau nanofluid model under the influence of magnetic, heat source/sink and cross diffusions over an exponentially stretching sheet. Chaos Solitons Fract. 2025;200:117171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117171.10.1016/j.chaos.2025.117171 ↗
36. Khan SA, Razzaq A, Hayat T, Razaq A. Artificial neural network analysis for entropy optimized flow of Jeffrey nanofluid invoking Cattaneo–Christov theory. Energy. 2025;335:137998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.137998.10.1016/j.energy.2025.137998 ↗
37. Shah NA, Masood K, Zeeshan PBC. Artificial neural networks model prediction for thermal, heat source and activation energy effects in bioconvection magnetocross third grade nanofluid across an extended cylinder. Nonlinear Dyn. 2025;113:33127–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-025-11740-w.10.1007/s11071-025-11740-w ↗
38. Shobika R, Vennila B, Loganathan K. Heat transfer analysis of Ethylene Glycol based hybrid nanofluid (Au-Ag) flow over a porous medium with gyrotactic microorganisms: Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation approach. Partial Differ Equ Appl Math. 2025;16:101292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.padiff.2025.101292.10.1016/j.padiff.2025.101292 ↗
39. Sindhu T, Jagadeeshkumar K. Entropy generation and regression analysis of unsteady Carreau ternary hybrid nanofluid flow with electromagnetic and thermal influences. Discover Nano. 2025;20:231. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-025-04408-2.10.1186/s11671-025-04408-2 ↗
40. Alharbi AF, Areshi M, Mohammad F, Usman M. Advanced thermal management for next-generation engineering heat control using magnetized ternary nanofluid transport between two coaxial disks. Discover Nano. 2026;21:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-025-04428-y.10.1186/s11671-025-04428-y ↗
41. Nasir S, Khan Z, Berrouk AS, Aamir A. Modeling and performance optimization of non-Newtonian hybrid nanofluid solar HVAC systems with magnetic effects using neural networks. Energy. 2025;338:138743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.138743.10.1016/j.energy.2025.138743 ↗
42. Habib S, Nasir S, Khan Z, Berrouk AS, Islam S, Aamir A. Machine-assisted simulation of heat and mass transfer through a porous Riga surface with chemical reactions and radiation effects. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2025;150:7949–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-025-14191-y.10.1007/s10973-025-14191-y ↗
43. Seth GS, Bhattacharyya A, Kumar R, Chamkha AJ. Entropy generation in hydromagnetic nanofluid flow over a non-linear stretching sheet with Navier’s velocity slip and convective heat transfer. Phys Fluids. 2018;30:122003. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5054099.10.1063/1.5054099 ↗
44. Bhatti MM, Sheikholeslami M, Shahid A, Hassan M, Abbas T. Entropy generation on the interaction of nanoparticles over a stretched surface with thermal radiation. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2019;570:368–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.03.058.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.03.058 ↗
45. Hayat T, Qayyum S, Alsaedi A, Ahmad B. Entropy generation minimization: Darcy–Forchheimer nanofluid flow due to curved stretching sheet with partial slip. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 2020;111:104445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2019.104445.10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2019.104445 ↗
46. Guedri K, Ameer Ahammad N, Nadeem S, Tag-ElDin EM, Awan AU, Yassen MF. Insight into the heat transfer of third-grade micropolar fluid over an exponentially stretched surface. Sci Rep. 2022;12:15577. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19124-5.10.1038/s41598-022-19124-5 ↗
47. Tshivhi KS, Tshehla SM. Entropy generation analysis due to permeable exponential stretching in boundary layer flows. Heat Transf. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1002/htj.70103.10.1002/htj.70103 ↗
48. Rivlin RS, Ericksen JL. Stress-deformation relations for isotropic materials. In: Collected papers of RS Rivlin. New York, NY: Springer; 1997, pp. 911–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2416-7_6110.1007/978-1-4612-2416-7_61 ↗
49. Mukhopadhyay S, De PR, Bhattacharyya K, Layek GC. Casson fluid flow over an unsteady stretching surface. Ain Shams Eng J. 2013;4:933–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2013.04.004.10.1016/j.asej.2013.04.004 ↗
50. Mukhopadhyay S. Effect of thermal radiation on unsteady mixed convection flow and heat transfer over a porous stretching surface in porous medium. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2009;52:3261–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.12.029.10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.12.029 ↗