journal article·2026-07-02Open access

Carbon based functional materials enable multifunctional flexible strain sensors for wearable and implantable applications

Siqi Wang, Xuemeng Li, Enci Xie, Shuo Gao

Discover Nano· Volume 21· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Flexible strain sensors are essential components for wearable electronics, implantable biointerfaces, and soft human–machine systems. As application scenarios expand from epidermal monitoring toward long-term in vivo operation, increasingly stringent requirements are imposed on multifunctionality, mechanical compliance, signal stability, and biointegration. Carbon-based functional materials, owing to their tunable electrical properties, structural versatility, and favorable electromechanical compatibility, have emerged as a central materials platform for next-generation flexible strain sensors. This review presents a comprehensive, mechanism-oriented overview of carbon-enabled flexible strain sensing, encompassing piezoresistive, capacitive, and piezoelectric transduction modes. This review systematically examine how carbon material dimensionality including low-dimensional nanofillers, two-dimensional sheets, and three-dimensional porous, governing sensitivity, durability, and long-term device reliability. Particular emphasis is placed on contrasting the fundamentally different design requirements of wearable and implantable systems, including sensitivity-stability trade-offs, tissue-level mechanical matching, and operational robustness in complex biological environments. Distinct from prior material- or device-centric reviews, this review establishes a unified framework linking carbon architectures, sensing mechanisms, and application contexts, thereby clarifying critical bottlenecks and design principles for advancing multifunctional, biointegrated strain sensors toward practical and translational use.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Xue Z, Gai Y, Wu Y, et al. Wearable mechanical and electrochemical sensors for real-time health monitoring. Commun Mater. 2024;5:211.10.1038/s43246-024-00658-2 ↗
2. Tu J, Flynn CD, Yeom J, et al. Wearable biomolecular sensing nanotechnologies in chronic disease management. Nat Nanotechnol. 2025;20:1388–404.10.1038/s41565-025-02010-2 ↗
3. Xie H, Yang L, Jiang B, et al. State-of-the-art wearable sensors for cardiovascular health: a review. NPJ Cardiovasc Health. 2025;2:53.10.1038/s44325-025-00090-6 ↗
4. Zheng Z, Zhu R, Peng I, Xu Z, Jiang Y. Wearable and implantable biosensors: mechanisms and applications in closed-loop therapeutic systems. J Mater Chem B. 2024;12:8577–604.10.1039/D4TB00782D ↗
5. Chen J, Jastrzebska-Perfect P, Chai P, et al. Barriers to translating continuous monitoring technologies for preventative medicine. Nat Biomed Eng. 2025;9:1797–815.10.1038/s41551-025-01520-7 ↗
6. Tucker S, Hanna J, Gutruf P. Wearable devices for continuous monitoring of biosignals: challenges and opportunities. APL Bioeng. 2022;6:021502.10.1063/5.0086935 ↗
7. Chen Y, Zhang X, Lu C. Flexible piezoelectric materials and strain sensors for wearable electronics and artificial intelligence applications. Chem Sci. 2024;15:16436–66.10.1039/D4SC05166A ↗
8. Kaidarova A, Khan MA, Marengo M, et al. Wearable multifunctional printed graphene sensors. NPJ Flex Electron. 2019;3:15.10.1038/s41528-019-0061-5 ↗
9. Yuk H, Wu J, Zhao X. Hydrogel interfaces for merging humans and machines. Nat Rev Mater. 2022;7:935–52.10.1038/s41578-022-00483-4 ↗
10. Lim K, Seo H, Chung WG, et al. Material and structural considerations for high-performance electrodes for wearable skin devices. Commun Mater. 2024;5:49.10.1038/s43246-024-00490-8 ↗
11. Ates HC, Nguyen PQ, Gonzalez-Macia L, et al. End-to-end design of wearable sensors. Nat Rev Mater. 2022;7:887–907.10.1038/s41578-022-00460-x ↗
12. Sun J, Wu X, Xiao J, Zhang Y, et al. Hydrogel-integrated multimodal response as a wearable and implantable bidirectional interface for biosensor and therapeutic electrostimulation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023;15(4):5897–909.10.1021/acsami.2c20057 ↗
13. Jang J, Jin S, Yoon S, et al. Materials strategy and device fabrication for stable closed-loop bioelectronics. NPJ Biosens. 2025;2:27.10.1038/s44328-025-00045-y ↗
14. Kim H, Lee YJ, Byun G, Choi C, Yeo WH. Advances in ultrathin soft sensors, integrated materials, and manufacturing technologies for enhanced monitoring of human physiological signals. Adv Electron Mater. 2023;9:2201294.10.1002/aelm.202201294 ↗
15. Biswas S, Lee SW, Lee Y, et al. Emerging energy harvesters in flexible bioelectronics: from wearable devices to biomedical innovations. Small Sci. 2024;4:2300148.10.1002/smsc.202300148 ↗
16. Wang Z, Shah A, Lee H, Lee CH. Microfluidic technologies for wearable and implantable biomedical devices. Lab Chip. 2025;25:4542–76.10.1039/D5LC00499C ↗
17. Wang X, Jin C, Bai Z. Review of carbon nanotube-based flexible wearable strain sensors: from materials to applications for human body. Sens Actuators A Phys. 2025;395:117071.10.1016/j.sna.2025.117071 ↗
18. Xue J, Liu D, Li D, et al. New carbon materials for multifunctional soft electronics. Adv Mater. 2025;37:2312596.10.1002/adma.202312596 ↗
19. Qin J, Tang Y, Zeng Y, Liu X, Tang D. Recent advances in flexible sensors: from sensing materials to detection modes. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2024;181(Pt B):118027.10.1016/j.trac.2024.118027 ↗
20. Zhang J, Lian S, Zhu F, et al. High-performance strain sensors using flexible micro-porous 3D-graphene with conductive network synergy. J Mater Chem C. 2025;13:3414–23.10.1039/D4TC04700A ↗
21. Song E, Serdijn WA. Bioelectronic medicine: wearable and implantable electronics. Bioelectron Med. 2025;11:22.10.1186/s42234-025-00185-6 ↗
22. Shinde S, Kim KH, Park SY, et al. Wearable sweat-sensing patches for non-invasive and continuous health tracking. Sens Actuators Rep. 2025;9:100265.10.1016/j.snr.2024.100265 ↗
23. Amjadi M, Kyung K-U, Park I, Sitti M. Stretchable, skin-mountable, and wearable strain sensors and their potential applications: a review. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26:1678–98.10.1002/adfm.201504755 ↗
24. Zhang H, Hong J, Zhu J, et al. Humanoid electronic-skin technology for the era of Artificial Intelligence of Things. Matter. 2025;8(5):102136.10.1016/j.matt.2025.102136 ↗
25. Song Y, Min J, Gao W. Wearable and implantable electronics: Moving toward precision therapy. ACS Nano. 2019;13(11):12280–6.10.1021/acsnano.9b08323 ↗
26. Lipomi DJ, Vosgueritchian M, Tee BC-K, et al. Skin-like pressure and strain sensors based on transparent elastic films of carbon nanotubes. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6:788–92.10.1038/nnano.2011.184 ↗
27. Mukherjee A, Dianatdar A, Gładysz MZ, et al. Electrically conductive and highly stretchable piezoresistive polymer nanocomposites via oxidative chemical vapor deposition. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023;15(26):31899–916.10.1021/acsami.3c06015 ↗
28. Meng Q, Chi T, Guo S, et al. Highly sensitive strain sensors with ultra-low detection limit based on pre-defined serpentine cracks. Mater Horiz. 2025;12:178–89.10.1039/D4MH01136H ↗
29. Cho J, Kim DH, Choi YJ, Kim M. Synergistic microcrack engineering and auxetic metamaterials for enhanced sensitivity in stretchable strain sensors. Adv Mater Technol. 2025;10(22):e01027.10.1002/admt.202501027 ↗
30. Ke K, Yue L, Shao H, et al. Boosting electrical and piezoresistive properties of polymer nanocomposites via hybrid carbon fillers: a review. Carbon. 2021;173:1020–40.10.1016/j.carbon.2020.11.070 ↗
31. Yamada T, Hayamizu Y, Yamamoto Y, et al. A stretchable carbon nanotube strain sensor for human-motion detection. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6:296–301.10.1038/nnano.2011.36 ↗
32. Haghgoo M, Hassanzadeh-Aghdam MK, Ansari R. A comprehensive evaluation of piezoresistive response and percolation behavior of multiscale polymer-based nanocomposites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2020;130:105735.10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105735 ↗
33. Li M, Pu J, Cao Q, et al. Recent advances in hydrogel-based flexible strain sensors for harsh environment applications. Chem Sci. 2024;15(43):17799–822.10.1039/D4SC05295A ↗
34. Duan L, D’hooge DR, Cardon L. Recent progress on flexible and stretchable piezoresistive strain sensors: from design to application. Prog Mater Sci. 2020;114:100617.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100617 ↗
35. Boland CS, Khan U, Backes C, et al. Sensitive, high-strain, high-rate bodily motion sensors based on graphene-rubber composites. ACS Nano. 2014;8(9):8819–30.10.1021/nn503454h ↗
36. Xu K, Li J, Zhang Z, et al. Ultra-sensitive crack-based strain sensor based on E-jet printing technology. Chem Eng Sci. 2026;324:123264.10.1016/j.ces.2025.123264 ↗
37. Fan X, Forsberg F, Smith AD, et al. Graphene ribbons with suspended masses as transducers in ultra-small nanoelectromechanical accelerometers. Nat Electron. 2019;2:394–404.10.1038/s41928-019-0287-1 ↗
38. Lee S, Lee Y, Park C, et al. Shape-reconfigurable crack-based strain sensor with ultrahigh and tunable sensitivity. Adv Funct Mater. 2025;35:2421812.10.1002/adfm.202421812 ↗
39. Li D, Wang H, Han Z, et al. Anisotropic structural carbon nanotube aerogels for piezoresistive strain sensors with multidirectional sensitivity. Compos Part B Eng. 2025;291:112028.10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.112028 ↗
40. Chen T, Ma L, Gong R, et al. Advanced design of next-generation piezoresistive sensors with tailored microstructures for digital healthcare. ACS Sens. 2025;10(11):8170–94.10.1021/acssensors.5c02599 ↗
41. Zhao S, Liu D, Yan F. Wearable resistive-type stretchable strain sensors: materials and applications. Adv Mater. 2025;37:2413929.10.1002/adma.202413929 ↗
42. Dai Y, Hu H, Wang M, et al. Stretchable transistors and functional circuits for human-integrated electronics. Nat Electron. 2021;4:17–29.10.1038/s41928-020-00513-5 ↗
43. Tian G, Chen J, Tian R, et al. Stretchable bioelectronic sensors with adhesive layer: current status and future challenges. J Mater Sci Mater Electron. 2025;36:1696.10.1007/s10854-025-15797-6 ↗
44. Ma Z, Zhang Y, Zhang K, Deng H, Fu Q. Recent progress in flexible capacitive sensors: structures and properties. Nano Mater Sci. 2023;5(3):265–77.10.1016/j.nanoms.2021.11.002 ↗
45. Wang R, Xie L, Xu Y. A sensitive capacitive sensor fabricated by paper-based microfluidics for multi-parametric health monitoring. Cellulose. 2025;32:5595–610.10.1007/s10570-025-06578-9 ↗
46. Qin J, Yin L-J, Hao Y-N, et al. Flexible and stretchable capacitive sensors with different microstructures. Adv Mater. 2021;33:2008267.10.1002/adma.202008267 ↗
47. Li Y et al. A high-precision low-power capacitive sensor readout circuit. In: 2024 4th International conference on electronics, circuits and information engineering (ECIE). Hangzhou, China; 2024. pp. 1–5.10.1109/ECIE61885.2024.10626236 ↗
48. Liu D, He H, Dong W, et al. Strategies for improving the performances of flexible capacitive pressure sensors: a review. Chem Eng J. 2026;529:172646.10.1016/j.cej.2026.172646 ↗
49. Mannsfeld SCB, Tee BC-K, Stoltenberg RM, et al. Highly sensitive flexible pressure sensors with microstructured rubber dielectric layers. Nat Mater. 2010;9:859–64.10.1038/nmat2834 ↗
50. Wang H, Li Z, Liu Z, et al. Flexible capacitive pressure sensors for wearable electronics. J Mater Chem C. 2022;10:1594–605.10.1039/D1TC05304C ↗
51. Qin R, Hu M, Li X, et al. A new strategy for the fabrication of a flexible and highly sensitive capacitive pressure sensor. Microsyst Nanoeng. 2021;7:100.10.1038/s41378-021-00327-1 ↗
52. He X, Liu Z, Shen G, et al. Microstructured capacitive sensor with broad detection range and long-term stability for human activity detection. NPJ Flex Electron. 2021;5:17.10.1038/s41528-021-00114-y ↗
53. Choi J, Kwon D, Kim K, et al. Synergistic effect of porous and microstructured dielectric layer for high-performance capacitive pressure sensor. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(1):1698–706.10.1021/acsami.9b20097 ↗
54. Yan D, Bruns TM, Wu Y, et al. Ultracompliant carbon nanotube direct bladder device. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8:1900477.10.1002/adhm.201900477 ↗
55. Hu X, Yang F, Wu M, et al. A super-stretchable and highly sensitive carbon nanotube capacitive strain sensor for wearable applications and soft robotics. Adv Mater Technol. 2022;7:2100769.10.1002/admt.202100769 ↗
56. Qin J, Zhao Y, Luo S, et al. Flexible and stretchable electrodes for capacitive sensors. J Electron Mater. 2022;51:2956–63.10.1007/s11664-022-09530-w ↗
57. Chen G, Zhu Y, Huang D, et al. Self-powered and self-sensing devices based on piezoelectric energy harvesting. Sci China Technol Sci. 2024;67:1631–67.10.1007/s11431-023-2535-0 ↗
58. Zhang J, Cong X, Yu X, Luo Y, Hu Y. A dual-function piezoelectric device for integrated energy harvesting and stiffness sensing. IEEE Sens J. 2025;25(19):37132–41.10.1109/JSEN.2025.3593956 ↗
59. Chen B, Feng Z, Yao FZ, et al. Flexible piezoelectrics: integration of sensing, actuating and energy harvesting. NPJ Flex Electron. 2025;9:58.10.1038/s41528-025-00432-5 ↗
60. Radeef ZS, Jweri A-RK, Alsayah AM, Alshukri MJ, Khaled M. Advances in piezoelectric energy harvesting: materials, configurations, and power optimisation strategies. Results Eng. 2025;28:107782.10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107782 ↗
61. Das KK, Basu B, Maiti P, Dubey AK. Piezoelectric nanogenerators for self-powered wearable and implantable bioelectronic devices. Acta Biomater. 2023;171:85–113.10.1016/j.actbio.2023.08.057 ↗
62. Le AT, Ahmadipour M, Pung S-Y. A review on ZnO-based piezoelectric nanogenerators: synthesis, characterization techniques, performance enhancement and applications. J Alloys Compd. 2020;844:156172.10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156172 ↗
63. Sun Y, Zheng Y, Wang R, Fan J, Liu Y. Direct-current piezoelectric nanogenerator based on two-layer zinc oxide nanorod arrays with equal c-axis orientation for energy harvesting. Chem Eng J. 2021;426:131262.10.1016/j.cej.2021.131262 ↗
64. Wang ZL, Song J. Piezoelectric nanogenerators based on zinc oxide nanowire arrays. Science. 2006;312(5771):242–6.10.1126/science.1124005 ↗
65. Panwar LS, Panwar V, Anoop G, Park S. Carbon nanofiber-polyelectrolyte triggered piezoelectric polymer-based hydrophilic nanocomposite for high sensing voltage generation. J Mater Res Technol. 2022;17:3246–61.10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.02.075 ↗
66. Hadavi Moghadam B, Hasanzadeh M, Simchi A. Self-powered wearable piezoelectric sensors based on polymer nanofiber-metal-organic framework nanoparticle composites for arterial pulse monitoring. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2020;3(9):8742–52.10.1021/acsanm.0c01551 ↗
67. Sun C, Liu H, Wang J, Shan G, Ren T. Flexible piezoelectric sensor based on PVDF/ZnO/MWCNT composites for human motion monitoring. Org Electron. 2025;144:107290.10.1016/j.orgel.2025.107290 ↗
68. Li M, Qiao J, Zhu C. Gel-electrolyte-coated carbon nanotube yarns for self-powered and knittable piezoionic sensors. ACS Appl Electron Mater. 2021;3(2):944–54.10.1021/acsaelm.0c01044 ↗
69. Ryu J, Kim J, Oh J, et al. Intrinsically stretchable multi-functional fiber with energy harvesting and strain sensing capability. Nano Energy. 2019;55:348–53.10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.071 ↗
70. Missaoui S, Bouhamed A, Nouri H, et al. Sustainable and flexible piezoelectric nanogenerator with hybrid nanocomposites based on high-performance synthesized BCZT powder. ACS Appl Electron Mater. 2024;6(8):5608–25.
71. Damjanovic D. Ferroelectric, dielectric and piezoelectric properties of ferroelectric thin films and ceramics. Rep Prog Phys. 1998;61(9):1267.10.1088/0034-4885/61/9/002 ↗
72. Mohamed Mustakim NS, Kamaruzaman D, Abdullah MH, et al. Review of recent advances in piezoelectric material for nanogenerator application: preparation methods, material selection, performance, applications, and future outlook. J Mater Sci. 2024;59:19380–423.10.1007/s10853-024-10293-4 ↗
73. Ren Z, Deng S, Shao J, et al. Ultrahigh-power-density flexible piezoelectric energy harvester based on freestanding ferroelectric oxide thin films. Nat Commun. 2025;16:3192.10.1038/s41467-025-58386-1 ↗
74. Das T, Tripathy S, Kumar A, Kar M. Flexible piezoelectric nanogenerator as a self-charging piezo-supercapacitor for energy harvesting and storage application. Nano Energy. 2025;136:110752.10.1016/j.nanoen.2025.110752 ↗
75. Sun HL, Zhao Y, Jiao SL, et al. Environment tolerant conductive nanocomposite organohydrogels as flexible strain sensors and power sources for sustainable electronics. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31:2101696.10.1002/adfm.202101696 ↗
76. Lv Y, Wei J, Huang Z, et al. Superelastic bamboo fiber-based spongy aerogel for flexible piezoresistive sensors with wide response range and high sensitivity. Chem Eng J. 2024;488:151053.10.1016/j.cej.2024.151053 ↗
77. Zheng L, Liu D, Dai J, Hao Z, et al. Flexible antibacterial strain sensor with low electrical hysteresis, ultralow detection limit, and wide linear sensing range for human motion monitoring and human-machine interaction. Chem Eng J. 2024;500:157289.10.1016/j.cej.2024.157289 ↗
78. Dong J, Wang D, Peng Y, Zhang C, Lai F, et al. Ultra-stretchable and superhydrophobic textile-based bioelectrodes for robust self-cleaning and personal health monitoring. Nano Energy. 2022;97:107160.10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107160 ↗
79. Wang F, Wang K, Chang Z, et al. Highly transparent and transferable ultralong carbon nanotube networks for transparent wearable electronics. ACS Nano. 2024;18:33245–55.10.1021/acsnano.4c15342 ↗
80. Jung Y, Gu J, Yeo J, et al. Highly sensitive soft pressure sensors for wearable applications based on composite films with curved 3D carbon nanotube structures. Small. 2024;20:2303981.10.1002/smll.202303981 ↗
81. Zhang S, Zhang H, Yao G, et al. Highly stretchable, sensitive, and flexible strain sensors based on silver nanoparticles/carbon nanotubes composites. J Alloys Compd. 2015;652:48–54.10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.08.187 ↗
82. Lux F. Models proposed to explain the electrical conductivity of mixtures made of conductive and insulating materials. J Mater Sci. 1993;28:285–301.10.1007/BF00357799 ↗
83. Bauhofer W, Kovacs JZ. A review and analysis of electrical percolation in carbon nanotube polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2009;69(10):1486–98.10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.018 ↗
84. Zhuang J, Liu Y, Bian D, He F, Li Y, Fan W. Spinning solution viscosity reducing and wet spinning of carbon black-based elastic conductive fibers for sports monitoring and healthcare electrical heating. J Mater Res Technol. 2025;36:1–12.10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.03.096 ↗
85. Tian X, Wang Q, Yang J, et al. Optimization design of MnO2-based fiber supercapacitors with diverse crystal structures. J Power Sources. 2025;632:236377.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.236377 ↗
86. Bu F, Liu K, Liang Z, et al. From micro-motion to joint monitoring: fiber-based strain sensors with unmatched sensitivity for flexible wearables. Chem Eng J. 2025;524:169119.10.1016/j.cej.2025.169119 ↗
87. Boomhendi M, Vatani M, Zare Y. Predicting of tunneling conductivity for polymer-carbon black nanocomposites by interphase percolation. Sci Rep. 2025;15:42322.10.1038/s41598-025-26321-5 ↗
88. Wang Z, Zhang J, Weng GJ. Modeling the percolation behavior of conductive particles/insulating polymer-based composites with equivalent circuit of resistance. Polymer. 2025;324:128262.10.1016/j.polymer.2025.128262 ↗
89. Abdollahi F, Mohammadi M, Zare Y, et al. Unraveling of electrical conductivity for nanocomposites containing carbon black: a new insight into tunneling resistance. Sci Rep. 2025;15:43554.10.1038/s41598-025-27527-3 ↗
90. Goldoni R, Ozkan-Aydin Y, Kim Y-S, et al. Stretchable nanocomposite sensors, nanomembrane interconnectors, and wireless electronics toward feedback-loop control of a soft earthworm robot. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(39):43388–97.10.1021/acsami.0c10672 ↗
91. Liu S, Zhang W, He J, et al. Fabrication techniques and sensing mechanisms of textile-based strain sensors: from spatial 1D and 2D perspectives. Adv Fiber Mater. 2024;6:36–67.10.1007/s42765-023-00338-9 ↗
92. Hakim ML, Alfarros Z, Herianto H, et al. High sensitivity flexible strain sensor for motion monitoring based on MWCNT@MXene and silicone rubber. Sci Rep. 2025;15:3741.10.1038/s41598-025-88372-y ↗
93. Amjadi M, Pichitpajongkit A, Lee S, et al. Highly stretchable and sensitive strain sensor based on silver nanowire-elastomer nanocomposite. ACS Nano. 2014;8(5):5154–63.10.1021/nn501204t ↗
94. Han S, Liu C, Xu H, et al. Multiscale nanowire-microfluidic hybrid strain sensors with high sensitivity and stretchability. NPJ Flexible Electron. 2018;2:16.10.1038/s41528-018-0029-x ↗
95. Huang L, Chen J, Xu Y, et al. Three-dimensional light-weight piezoresistive sensors based on conductive polyurethane sponges coated with hybrid CNT/CB nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci. 2021;548:149268.10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149268 ↗
96. Su B, Wang B, Cao Y, Dou H, Zhang T, He X. A multi-functional flexible piezoresistive sensor based on sericin-functionalized CNTs decorated carbon foams for wearable thermal-therapy devices. Ceram Int. 2024;50(7):10305–13.10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.12.342 ↗
97. Shao Y, Zou L, Chen Y, et al. Core-sheath structured CNT@Ni-CNT fiber-based multifunctional fabric with high-sensitivity, wide-range strain sensing, and enhanced electromagnetic shielding absorption. Chem Eng J. 2025;512:162358.10.1016/j.cej.2025.162358 ↗
98. Ding Y, Cao J, Dong H, et al. A fabric-based strain sensor with a microbridge structure and the supercapacitor-powered integrated sensing system. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024;16(26):34113–24.10.1021/acsami.4c05753 ↗
99. Salvi A, Kharbanda S, Thakur P, Shandilya M, Thakur A. Biomedical application of carbon quantum dots: a review. Carbon Trends. 2024;17:100407.10.1016/j.cartre.2024.100407 ↗
100. Piasek A, Pulit-Prociak J. Application of carbon quantum dots in smart polymer films for biomedical diagnostics. Nanoscale. 2025;17:24427–56.10.1039/D5NR02878G ↗