journal article·2023-04-21Open access

Nanomaterials: a review of emerging contaminants with potential health or environmental impact

Amer S. El-Kalliny, Mahmoud S. Abdel-Wahed, Adel A. El-Zahhar, Ibrahim A. Hamza, Tarek A. Gad-Allah

Discover Nano· Volume 18· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Nanotechnologies have been advantageous in many sectors and gaining much concern due to the unique physical, chemical and biological properties of nanomaterials (NMs). We have surveyed peer-reviewed publications related to “nanotechnology”, “NMs”, “NMs water treatment”, “NMs air treatment”, and “NMs environmental risk” in the last 23 years. We found that most of the research work is focused on developing novel applications for NMs and new products with peculiar features. In contrast, there are relatively few of publications concerning NMs as environmental contaminants relative to that for NMs applications. Thus, we devoted this review for NMs as emerging environmental contaminants. The definition and classification of NMs will be presented first to demonstrate the importance of unifying the NMs definition. The information provided here should facilitate the detection, control, and regulation of NMs contaminants in the environment. The high surface-area-to-volume ratio and the reactivity of NMs contaminants cause the prediction of the chemical properties and potential toxicities of NPs to be extremely difficult; therefore, we found that there are marked knowledge gaps in the fate, impact, toxicity, and risk of NMs. Consequently, developing and modifying extraction methods, detection tools, and characterization technologies are essential for complete risk assessment of NMs contaminants in the environment. This will help also in setting regulations and standards for releasing and handling NMs as there are no specific regulations. Finally, the integrated treatment technologies are necessary for the removal of NMs contaminants in water. Also, membrane technology is recommended for NMs remediation in air.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Environmental remediation with nanomaterials · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Vlachogianni T, Valavanidis A. Nanomaterials: environmental pollution, ecolological risks and adverse health effects. Nano Sci Nano Technol Indian J. 2014;8:208–26.
2. Saleh TA. Trends in the sample preparation and analysis of nanomaterials as environmental contaminants. Trends Environ Anal Chem. 2020;28:e00101.10.1016/j.teac.2020.e00101 ↗
3. Souza RR, et al. Recent advances on the thermal properties and applications of nanofluids: from nanomedicine to renewable energies. Appl Therm Eng. 2022;201: 117725.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117725 ↗
4. EPA, U.S.E.P.A. Emerging contaminants nanomaterials. https://archive.epa.gov/region9/mediacenter/web/pdf/emerging_contaminant_nanomaterials.pdf. 2010.
5. Richardson SD, Kimura SY. Emerging environmental contaminants: challenges facing our next generation and potential engineering solutions. Environ Technol Innov. 2017;8:40–56.10.1016/j.eti.2017.04.002 ↗
6. EPA, U.S.E.P.A., Technical fact sheet–nanomaterials. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-03/documents/ffrrofactsheet_emergingcontaminant_nanomaterials_jan2014_final.pdf. 2017.
7. Sauvé S, Desrosiers M. A review of what is an emerging contaminant. Chem Cent J. 2014;8(1):1–7.10.1186/1752-153X-8-15 ↗
8. Gwenzi W, et al. Sources, behaviour, and environmental and human health risks of high-technology rare earth elements as emerging contaminants. Sci Total Environ. 2018;636:299–313.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.235 ↗
9. Sengupta S, et al. New bioremediation technologies to remove heavy metals and radionuclides. In: Shah MP, editor., et al., Removal of emerging contaminants through microbial processes. Singapore: Springer; 2021. p. 23–45.10.1007/978-981-15-5901-3_2 ↗
10. Priya A, et al. Occurrences and removal of pharmaceutical and personal care products from aquatic systems using advanced treatment-a review. Environ Res. 2022;204: 112298.10.1016/j.envres.2021.112298 ↗
11. ISO, International Organization for Standardization. Nanotechnologies vocabulary part 1: core terms. ISO/TS 80004-1. 2010.
12. Rauscher H, et al. Identification of nanomaterials through measurements. Publications Office of the European Union. 2019.
13. ISO, International Organization for Standardization. Technical specification: nanotechnologiesdterminology and definitions for nano-objectsdnanoparticle, nanofibre and nanoplate. ISO/TS 80004-2:2008. 2008.
14. Siddique K, et al. Comparative efficacy of biogenic zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized by Pseudochrobactrum sp. C5 and chemically synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles for catalytic degradation of dyes and wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28:1–12.10.1007/s11356-021-12575-9 ↗
15. Wang F, et al. Towards mass production of a spherical montmorillonite@ covalent organic framework@ gold nanoparticles heterostructure as a high-efficiency catalyst for reduction of methylene blue. Appl Clay Sci. 2021;203: 106007.10.1016/j.clay.2021.106007 ↗
16. Bokare A, Chinnusamy S, Erogbogbo F. TiO2–graphene quantum dots nanocomposites for photocatalysis in energy and biomedical applications. Catalysts. 2021;11(3):319.10.3390/catal11030319 ↗
17. Anang E, et al. Compositional evolution of nanoscale zero valent iron and 2, 4-dichlorophenol during dechlorination by attapulgite supported Fe/Ni nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater. 2021;412: 125246.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125246 ↗
18. Lee W, et al. TiO2 nanotubes with a ZnO thin energy barrier for improved current efficiency of CdSe quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells. Nanotechnology. 2009;20(33):335706–12.10.1088/0957-4484/20/33/335706 ↗
19. Khin MM, et al. A review on nanomaterials for environmental remediation. Energy Environ Sci. 2012;5(8):8075–109.10.1039/c2ee21818f ↗
20. Pradeep T. Noble metal nanoparticles for water purification: a critical review. Thin Solid Films. 2009;517(24):6441–78.10.1016/j.tsf.2009.03.195 ↗
21. Deshpande B, et al. Prospective of nanotechnology in degradation of waste water: a new challenges. Nano Struct Nano Objects. 2020;22: 100442.10.1016/j.nanoso.2020.100442 ↗
22. Mukhopadhyay R, et al. Nanomaterials for sustainable remediation of chemical contaminants in water and soil. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2021.1886891.10.1080/10643389.2021.1886891 ↗
23. Buzea C, Pacheco II, Robbie K. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: sources and toxicity. Biointerphases. 2007;2(4):MR17–71.10.1116/1.2815690 ↗
24. Grieger KD, et al. Environmental risk analysis for nanomaterials: review and evaluation of frameworks. Nanotoxicology. 2012;6(2):196–212.10.3109/17435390.2011.569095 ↗
25. Kumar P, Fennell P, Robins A. Comparison of the behaviour of manufactured and other airborne nanoparticles and the consequences for prioritising research and regulation activities. J Nanopart Res. 2010;12(5):1523–30.10.1007/s11051-010-9893-6 ↗
26. Baysal A, Saygin H. Smart nanosensors and methods for detection of nanoparticles and their potential toxicity in air. In: Nanomaterials for air remediation. Elsevier; 2020. p. 33–59.10.1016/B978-0-12-818821-7.00003-8 ↗
27. Peralta-Videa JR, et al. Nanomaterials and the environment: a review for the biennium 2008–2010. J Hazard Mater. 2011;186(1):1–15.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.020 ↗
28. Englert BC. Nanomaterials and the environment: uses, methods and measurement. J Environ Monit. 2007;9(11):1154–61.10.1039/b705988d ↗
29. Richardson SD. Water analysis: emerging contaminants and current issues. Anal Chem. 2009;81(12):4645–77.10.1021/ac9008012 ↗
30. Richardson SD, Kimura SY. Water analysis: emerging contaminants and current issues. Anal Chem. 2015;88(1):546–82.10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04493 ↗
31. Richardson SD, Ternes TA. Water analysis: emerging contaminants and current issues. Anal Chem. 2011;83(12):4614–48.10.1021/ac200915r ↗
32. Richardson SD, Ternes TA. Water analysis: emerging contaminants and current issues. Anal Chem. 2014;86(6):2813–48.10.1021/ac500508t ↗
33. Richardson SD, Ternes TA. Water analysis: emerging contaminants and current issues. Anal Chem. 2017;90(1):398–428.10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04577 ↗
34. Jeevanandam J, et al. Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: history, sources, toxicity and regulations. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2018;9(1):1050–74.10.3762/bjnano.9.98 ↗
35. Kokkinos P, Mantzavinos D, Venieri D. Current trends in the application of nanomaterials for the removal of emerging micropollutants and pathogens from water. Molecules. 2020;25(9):2016.10.3390/molecules25092016 ↗
36. Kumar N, Kumbhat S. Carbon-based nanomaterials. Chapter 5 in Essentials in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology”. 2016:189–236.10.1002/9781119096122.ch5 ↗
37. Pokropivny V, Skorokhod V. Classification of nanostructures by dimensionality and concept of surface forms engineering in nanomaterial science. Mater Sci Eng C. 2007;27(5–8):990–3.10.1016/j.msec.2006.09.023 ↗
38. Ijaz I, et al. Detail review on chemical, physical and green synthesis, classification, characterizations and applications of nanoparticles. Green Chem Lett Rev. 2020;13(3):223–45.10.1080/17518253.2020.1802517 ↗
39. Stouwdam JW, Janssen RA. Red, green, and blue quantum dot LEDs with solution processable ZnO nanocrystal electron injection layers. J Mater Chem. 2008;18(16):1889–94.10.1039/b800028j ↗
40. Ustinov V, et al. Long-wavelength quantum dot lasers on GaAs substrates. Nanotechnology. 2000;11(4):397–400.10.1088/0957-4484/11/4/341 ↗
41. Huang L, et al. Cuprite nanowires by electrodeposition from lyotropic reverse hexagonal liquid crystalline phase. Chem Mater. 2002;14(2):876–80.10.1021/cm010819r ↗
42. Okada T, et al. Synthesis of ZnO nanorods by laser ablation of ZnO and Zn targets in He and O2 background gas. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2005;44(1S):688–91.10.1143/JJAP.44.688 ↗
43. Xia H, et al. MnO2 nanotube and nanowire arrays by electrochemical deposition for supercapacitors. J Power Sour. 2010;195(13):4410–3.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.01.075 ↗
44. Pradhan D, Leung K. Vertical growth of two-dimensional zinc oxide nanostructures on ITO-coated glass: effects of deposition temperature and deposition time. J Phys Chem C. 2008;112(5):1357–64.10.1021/jp076890n ↗
45. Saleh TA. Nanomaterials: classification, properties, and environmental toxicities. Environ Technol Innov. 2020;20:101067.10.1016/j.eti.2020.101067 ↗
46. Mann AK, Skrabalak SE. Synthesis of single-crystalline nanoplates by spray pyrolysis: a metathesis route to Bi2WO6. Chem Mater. 2011;23(4):1017–22.10.1021/cm103007v ↗
47. Tiwari JN, Tiwari RN, Kim KS. Zero-dimensional, one-dimensional, two-dimensional and three-dimensional nanostructured materials for advanced electrochemical energy devices. Prog Mater Sci. 2012;57(4):724–803.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.08.003 ↗
48. Liu J, Essner J, Li J. Hybrid supercapacitor based on coaxially coated manganese oxide on vertically aligned carbon nanofiber arrays. Chem Mater. 2010;22(17):5022–30.10.1021/cm101591p ↗
49. Wang JN, Su LF, Wu ZP. Growth of highly compressed and regular coiled carbon nanotubes by a spray-pyrolysis method. Cryst Growth Des. 2008;8(5):1741–7.10.1021/cg700671p ↗
50. Hwang IC, et al. Controlling metal nanotoppings on the tip of silicide nanostructures. Nanotechnology. 2009;20(24):245605–12.10.1088/0957-4484/20/24/245605 ↗
51. Poh TY, et al. Inhaled nanomaterials and the respiratory microbiome: clinical, immunological and toxicological perspectives. Part Fibre Toxicol. 2018;15:1–16.10.1186/s12989-018-0282-0 ↗
52. Khan FA. Nanomaterials: types, classifications, and sources. In: Khan FA, Khan F, editors. Applications of nanomaterials in human health. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 1–13.10.1007/978-981-15-4802-4 ↗
53. Azarmi F, Kumar P, Mulheron M. The exposure to coarse, fine and ultrafine particle emissions from concrete mixing, drilling and cutting activities. J Hazard Mater. 2014;279:268–79.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.07.003 ↗
54. Kumar P, et al. Nanoparticle emissions from 11 non-vehicle exhaust sources–a review. Atmos Environ. 2013;67:252–77.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.011 ↗
55. Ju-Nam Y, Lead JR. Manufactured nanoparticles: an overview of their chemistry, interactions and potential environmental implications. Sci Total Environ. 2008;400(1–3):396–414.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.042 ↗
56. Louie SM, Ma R, Lowry GV. Transformations of nanomaterials in the environment. In: Cavaliere E, Benetti G, Banfi F, Gavioli L, editors. Frontiers of nanoscience, vol. 7. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014. p. 55–87.
57. Mohamed EF, Awad G. Zinc nanoparticles in marine environments: an overview. Zinc Based Nanostructures Environ Agric Appl. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822836-4.00020-3.10.1016/B978-0-12-822836-4.00020-3 ↗
58. Luoma SN. Silver nanotechnologies and the environment. Proj Emerg Nanotechnol Rep. 2008;15:12–3.
59. Klaine SJ, et al. Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2008;27(9):1825–51.10.1897/08-090.1 ↗
60. Lowry GV, et al. Environmental occurrences, behavior, fate, and ecological effects of nanomaterials: an introduction to the special series. J Environ Qual. 2010;39(6):1867–74.10.2134/jeq2010.0297 ↗
61. Tourinho PS, et al. Metal-based nanoparticles in soil: fate, behavior, and effects on soil invertebrates. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2012;31(8):1679–92.10.1002/etc.1880 ↗
62. Wiesner MR, et al. Assessing the risks of manufactured nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40(14):4336–45.10.1021/es062726m ↗
63. Maher B, et al. Iron-rich air pollution nanoparticles: an unrecognised environmental risk factor for myocardial mitochondrial dysfunction and cardiac oxidative stress. Environ Res. 2020;188: 109816.10.1016/j.envres.2020.109816 ↗
64. Ning Z, et al. Experimental study of environmental tobacco smoke particles under actual indoor environment. Sci Total Environ. 2006;367(2–3):822–30.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02.017 ↗
65. Stefani D, Wardman D, Lambert T. The implosion of the Calgary General Hospital: ambient air quality issues. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2005;55(1):52–9.10.1080/10473289.2005.10464605 ↗
66. Lin D, et al. Fate and transport of engineered nanomaterials in the environment. J Environ Qual. 2010;39(6):1896–908.10.2134/jeq2009.0423 ↗
67. Kalavrouziotis I, Koukoulakis P. The environmental impact of the platinum group elements (Pt, Pd, Rh) emitted by the automobile catalyst converters. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2009;196(1–4):393–402.10.1007/s11270-008-9786-9 ↗
68. Stahlmecke B, et al. Investigation of airborne nanopowder agglomerate stability in an orifice under various differential pressure conditions. J Nanopart Res. 2009;11(7):1625–35.10.1007/s11051-009-9731-x ↗
69. Schneider T, Jensen KA. Relevance of aerosol dynamics and dustiness for personal exposure to manufactured nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res. 2009;11(7):1637–50.10.1007/s11051-009-9706-y ↗
70. Zhai Y, et al. The fate and toxicity of Pb-based perovskite nanoparticles on soil bacterial community: Impacts of pH, humic acid, and divalent cations. Chemosphere. 2020;249: 126564.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126564 ↗
71. Lin J, et al. Influence of different types of nanomaterials on soil enzyme activity: a global meta-analysis. Nano Today. 2022;42: 101345.10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101345 ↗
72. Lubick N. Risks of nanotechnology remain uncertain. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42(6):1821–4.10.1021/es087058e ↗
73. Zhang M, et al. What occurs in colloidal gas aphron-induced separation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles? Particle fate analysis by tracking technologies. Sci Total Environ. 2020;716: 137104.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137104 ↗
74. Hyseni S. Toxicological effects of nanomaterials on aqueous and terrestrial ecosystems. Cent Dev Strategy. 2016;2016(1).
75. Nam D-H, et al. Uptake and bioaccumulation of titanium-and silver-nanoparticles in aquatic ecosystems. Mol Cell Toxicol. 2014;10(1):9–17.10.1007/s13273-014-0002-2 ↗
76. Federici G, Shaw BJ, Handy RD. Toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): gill injury, oxidative stress, and other physiological effects. Aquat Toxicol. 2007;84(4):415–30.10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.07.009 ↗
77. Avant B, et al. Environmental fate of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide across different aquatic ecosystems. NanoImpact. 2019;13:1–12.10.1016/j.impact.2018.11.001 ↗
78. Singh A, et al. Green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles as effective alternatives to treat antibiotics resistant bacterial infections: a review. Biotechnol Rep. 2020;25: e00427.10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00427 ↗
79. Cao J, et al. Artificial bioaugmentation of biomacromolecules and living organisms for biomedical applications. ACS Nano. 2021;15(3):3900–26.10.1021/acsnano.0c10144 ↗
80. SCENIHR, Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks. modified opinion (after public consultation) on: the appropriateness of existing methodologies to assess the potential risks associated with engineered and adventitious products of nanotechnologies SCENIHR/002/05. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_003b.pdf. 2006.
81. Favi PM, et al. Shape and surface effects on the cytotoxicity of nanoparticles: gold nanospheres versus gold nanostars. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2015;103(11):3449–62.10.1002/jbm.a.35491 ↗
82. Foroozandeh P, Aziz AA. Insight into cellular uptake and intracellular trafficking of nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2018;13(1):1–12.10.1186/s11671-018-2728-6 ↗
83. Hoshyar N, et al. The effect of nanoparticle size on in vivo pharmacokinetics and cellular interaction. Nanomedicine. 2016;11:673–92.10.2217/nnm.16.5 ↗
84. El-Shabouri MH. Positively charged nanoparticles for improving the oral bioavailability of cyclosporin-A. Int J Pharm. 2002;249(1–2):101–8.10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00461-1 ↗
85. Duan X, Li Y. Physicochemical characteristics of nanoparticles affect circulation, biodistribution, cellular internalization, and trafficking. Small. 2013;9(9–10):1521–32.10.1002/smll.201201390 ↗
86. Choi J, et al. Comparison of cytotoxic and inflammatory responses of photoluminescent silicon nanoparticles with silicon micron-sized particles in RAW 264.7 macrophages. J Appl Toxicol. 2009;29(1):52–60.10.1002/jat.1382 ↗
87. Donkor DA, Tang XS. Tube length and cell type-dependent cellular responses to ultra-short single-walled carbon nanotube. Biomaterials. 2014;35(9):3121–31.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.12.075 ↗
88. Rejman J, et al. Size-dependent internalization of particles via the pathways of clathrin-and caveolae-mediated endocytosis. Biochem J. 2004;377(1):159–69.10.1042/bj20031253 ↗
89. Lu C-W, et al. Bifunctional magnetic silica nanoparticles for highly efficient human stem cell labeling. Nano Lett. 2007;7(1):149–54.10.1021/nl0624263 ↗
90. Albanese A, Tang PS, Chan WC. The effect of nanoparticle size, shape, and surface chemistry on biological systems. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2012;14(1):1–16.10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150124 ↗
91. Sonavane G, Tomoda K, Makino K. Biodistribution of colloidal gold nanoparticles after intravenous administration: effect of particle size. Coll Surf B. 2008;66(2):274–80.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.07.004 ↗
92. Cho EC, et al. The effects of size, shape, and surface functional group of gold nanostructures on their adsorption and internalization by cells. Small. 2010;6(4):517–22.10.1002/smll.200901622 ↗
93. Raffa V, et al. Physicochemical properties affecting cellular uptake of carbon nanotubes. Nanomedicine. 2010;5(1):89–97.10.2217/nnm.09.95 ↗
94. Agarwal R, et al. Mammalian cells preferentially internalize hydrogel nanodiscs over nanorods and use shape-specific uptake mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(43):17247–52.10.1073/pnas.1305000110 ↗
95. Dasgupta S, Auth T, Gompper G. Shape and orientation matter for the cellular uptake of nonspherical particles. Nano Lett. 2014;14(2):687–93.10.1021/nl403949h ↗
96. Lee YK, et al. Effect of the protein corona on nanoparticles for modulating cytotoxicity and immunotoxicity. Int J Nanomed. 2015;10:97.
97. Pietroiusti A, Campagnolo L, Fadeel B. Interactions of engineered nanoparticles with organs protected by internal biological barriers. Small. 2013;9(9–10):1557–72.10.1002/smll.201201463 ↗
98. Auría-Soro C, et al. Interactions of nanoparticles and biosystems: microenvironment of nanoparticles and biomolecules in nanomedicine. Nanomaterials. 2019;9(10):1365.10.3390/nano9101365 ↗
99. Xiao W, Gao H. The impact of protein corona on the behavior and targeting capability of nanoparticle-based delivery system. Int J Pharm. 2018;552(1–2):328–39.10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.10.011 ↗
100. Saptarshi SR, Duschl A, Lopata AL. Interaction of nanoparticles with proteins: relation to bio-reactivity of the nanoparticle. J Nanobiotechnol. 2013;11(1):1–12.10.1186/1477-3155-11-26 ↗