Synthesis and evaluation of selenium-doped nanocomposites in enhancing drilling fluid properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Drilling operations increasingly face challenges related to poor rheology control, excessive fluid loss, and inefficient cuttings transport, especially in HPHT conditions. This study aimed to address these issues by developing a sustainable nanoparticle based additive synthesized through a green route. A biogenic extract from Pinus nigra pollen was used to produce selenium doped silver zinc oxide nanocomposites (Se@Ag/AgO–ZnO) via a single step co precipitation method. The resulting heterostructured material exhibited nanoscale crystallite size and a textured morphology confirmed by SEM. The nanocomposite was incorporated into water based drilling fluids at concentrations of 0 to 5000 ppm. Rheological behavior was evaluated using Bingham Plastic modeling, filtration performance was measured under standard and HPHT conditions, and cuttings transport was assessed through rolling oven tests. Results showed that the optimal concentration of 1000 ppm increased yield point to 12.12 Pa and plastic viscosity to 48.7 cP while maintaining high model accuracy with R2 values of at least 0.991. Filtrate volumes decreased by up to 68.5 percent in standard tests and 69.2 percent in HPHT tests due to formation of a compact and low permeability filter cake. Quartz and shale cuttings recovery reached 88 percent and 79 percent respectively at 1000 ppm. At 5000 ppm, mild performance decline was linked to particle agglomeration. These findings demonstrate that pollen derived nanocomposites can enhance drilling fluid behavior and offer a sustainable approach for improving rheology, filtration control, and hole cleaning efficiency.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Drilling and Well Engineering · Metal Extraction and Bioleaching · Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Cameron CB. Drilling fluids design and field procedures to meet the ultra deepwater drilling challenge In: Nigerian annual international conference and exhibition. 2000. p. SPE-66061-MS.10.2118/66061-MS ↗
2. Smith PS, et al. Drilling fluid design to prevent formation damage in high permeability quartz arenite sandstones. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. 1996. p. SPE-36430-MS.10.2118/36430-MS ↗
3. Baumert Michael E, Allouche Erez N, Moore Ian D. Drilling fluid considerations in design of engineered horizontal directional drilling installations. Int J Geomechan. 2005;5(4):339–49.10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2005)5:4(339) ↗
4. Gaurina-Međimurec N, et al. Drilling fluid and cement slurry design for naturally fractured reservoirs. Appl Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11020767.10.3390/app11020767 ↗
5. Bilgesu HI, et al. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) as a tool to study cutting transport in wellbores. In: SPE eastern regional meeting. 2002. p. SPE-78716-MS.10.2118/78716-MS ↗
6. Naderi M, Khamehchi E. Cutting transport efficiency prediction using probabilistic CFD and DOE techniques. J Pet Sci Eng. 2018;163:58–66.10.1016/j.petrol.2017.12.083 ↗
7. Khosravimanesh S, et al. Study of effect of cooling/lubricating fluids, machining parameters, and rock mechanical properties on penetration rate in rock drilling process. J Min Environ. 2021;12(3):825–43.
8. Rawal R, et al. Application of polymeric drilling fluids for reducing wearing of drill bit. J Indian Chem Soc. 2022;99(2):100324.10.1016/j.jics.2021.100324 ↗
9. Esfahanizadeh L, Dabir B, Goharpey F. CFD modeling of the flow behavior around a PDC drill bit: effects of nano-enhanced drilling fluids on cutting transport and cooling efficiency. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech. 2022;16(1):977–94.
10. Kelessidis VC, Zografou M, Chatzistamou V. optimization of drilling fluid rheological and fluid loss properties utilizing PHPA polymer. In: SPE middle east oil and gas show and conference. 2013.10.2118/164351-MS ↗
11. Judzis A, et al. Optimization of deep-drilling performance—benchmark testing drives ROP improvements for bits and drilling fluids. SPE Drill Complet. 2009;24(01):25–39.10.2118/105885-PA ↗
12. Black AD, et al. Optimization of deep drilling performance with improvements in drill bit and drilling fluid design. In: IADC/SPE drilling conference. 2008.10.2118/112731-MS ↗
13. Yunita P, Irawan S, Kania D. Optimization of water-based drilling fluid using non-ionic and anionic surfactant additives. Procedia Eng. 2016;148:1184–90.10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.628 ↗
14. da Silva Medeiros DCC, et al. Biochar-enhanced removal of naphthenic acids from oil sands process water: influence of feedstock and chemical activation. Energy Environ Sustain. 2025;1(2):100028.
15. Sadegh Hassani S, et al. The effect of nanoparticles on the heat transfer properties of drilling fluids. J Pet Sci Eng. 2016;146:183–90.10.1016/j.petrol.2016.04.009 ↗
16. Abdullah AH, et al. A comprehensive review of nanoparticles: Effect on water-based drilling fluids and wellbore stability. Chemosphere. 2022;308:136274.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136274 ↗
17. Rafati R, et al. Effect of nanoparticles on the modifications of drilling fluids properties: a review of recent advances. J Pet Sci Eng. 2018;161:61–76.10.1016/j.petrol.2017.11.067 ↗
18. Cheraghian G. Nanoparticles in drilling fluid: a review of the state-of-the-art. J Mater Res Technol. 2021;13:737–53.10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.04.089 ↗
19. Al-Muntasheri GA, Liang F, Hull KL. Nanoparticle-enhanced hydraulic-fracturing fluids: a review. SPE Prod Oper. 2017;32(02):186–95.
20. Bejan A, Errera MR. Deterministic tree networks for fluid flow: geometry for minimal flow resistance between a volume and one point. Fractals. 1997;05(04):685–95.10.1142/S0218348X97000553 ↗
21. Li M-C, et al. Cellulose nanoparticles as modifiers for rheology and fluid loss in bentonite water-based fluids. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(8):5006–16.10.1021/acsami.5b00498 ↗
22. Al-Shargabi M, et al. Nanoparticle applications as beneficial oil and gas drilling fluid additives: a review. J Mol Liq. 2022;352:118725.10.1016/j.molliq.2022.118725 ↗
23. Taborda EA, et al. Rheological demonstration of alteration in the heavy crude oil fluid structure upon addition of nanoparticles. Fuel. 2017;189:322–33.10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.110 ↗
24. Abdo J, Haneef MD. Nano-enhanced drilling fluids: pioneering approach to overcome uncompromising drilling problems. J Energy Resour Technol. 2011;134(1).10.1115/1.4005244 ↗
25. Vryzas Z, Kelessidis VC. Nano-based drilling fluids: a review. Energies. 2017;10(4):540.10.3390/en10040540 ↗
26. Bland R, Jones T, Tibbitts GA. Reducing drilling costs by drilling faster. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition. 1997.10.2118/38616-MS ↗
27. Mao H, et al. Development and application of ultra-high temperature drilling fluids in offshore oilfield around Bohai sea Bay Basin, China. In: Offshore technology conference Asia. 2016.10.4043/26384-MS ↗
28. Abdo J, Haneef MD. Nanomaterials modified drilling fluid for improving deep drilling conditions. J Energy Resour Technol. 2021;144(7).10.1115/1.4052186 ↗
29. Mohamed A, Salehi S, Ahmed R. Significance and complications of drilling fluid rheology in geothermal drilling: a review. Geothermics. 2021;93:102066.10.1016/j.geothermics.2021.102066 ↗
30. Davoodi S, et al. Thermally stable and salt-resistant synthetic polymers as drilling fluid additives for deployment in harsh sub-surface conditions: a review. J Mol Liq. 2023;371:121117.10.1016/j.molliq.2022.121117 ↗
31. Rana S. Facts and data on environmental risks—oil and gas drilling operations. In: SPE Asia Pacific oil and gas conference and exhibition. 2008.10.2118/114993-MS ↗
32. Clark RK. Impact of environmental regulations on drilling-fluid technology. J Pet Technol. 1994;46(09):804–9.10.2118/27979-PA ↗
33. Roger B, Leuterman AJJ, Cheryl S. Drilling fluids: making peace with the environment. J Pet Technol. 1993;45(01):6–10.10.2118/24553-PA ↗
34. Reinhold WB, Close DA. Drilling optimization—the driller’s role. SPE Drill Complet. 1997;12(01):5–12.10.2118/29365-PA ↗
35. Eren T, Ozbayoglu ME. Real time optimization of drilling parameters during drilling operations. In: SPE oil and gas india conference and exhibition. 2010.10.2118/129126-MS ↗
36. Wang J. Development of drilling optimization strategies for CAM applications. J Mater Process Technol. 1998;84(1):181–8.10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00095-8 ↗
37. Karlsson H, Brassfield T, Krueger V. Performance drilling optimization. In: SPE/IADC drilling conference. 1985.10.2118/13474-MS ↗
38. Lummus JL. Factors to be considered in drilling optimization. J Can Pet Technol. 1969;8(04):138–46.10.2118/69-04-02 ↗
39. Hankins D, Salehi S, Saleh FK. An integrated approach for drilling optimization using advanced drilling optimizer. J Pet Eng. 2015;2015(1):281276.
40. Javanmard H, Koraeizadeh A-W. Optimizing the preventive maintenance scheduling by genetic algorithm based on cost and reliability in National Iranian Drilling Company. J Ind Eng Int. 2016;12(4):509–16.10.1007/s40092-016-0155-9 ↗
41. Tang Y, et al. A framework for making maintenance decisions for oil and gas drilling and production equipment. J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 2015;26:1050–8.10.1016/j.jngse.2015.07.038 ↗
42. Ai C, et al. Na₂CO₃-SiO₂-H₂O nanofluid synergistically treats coal dust and hydrogen sulfide. J Environ Chem Eng. 2025; 119365.10.1016/j.jece.2025.119365 ↗
43. Zheng M, et al. Optimization of microcrack control and performance in deepwater well cementing with microencapsulated phase change materials. Geoenergy Sci Eng. 2025; 214220.10.1016/j.geoen.2025.214220 ↗
44. Khan MA, et al. Enhanced filtration performance of cellulose nanofiber/bentonite water-based drilling fluids with temperature- and salt-resistant polymers for extreme conditions. SPE J. 2025;30(09):5327–49.10.2118/228402-PA ↗
45. Fan W, et al. Review of nanoparticles in water-based drilling fluids: innovations, challenges, and future directions. Energy Fuels. 2025;39(19):8800–26.10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c00700 ↗
46. Bayat AE, Shams R. Appraising the impacts of SiO2, ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles on rheological properties and shale inhibition of water-based drilling muds. Colloids Surf A. 2019;581:123792.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.123792 ↗
47. Bamigdad SA, et al. Extracting and developing nano carboxymethyl cellulose for enhanced drilling fluid formulation using local resources, in middle east oil, gas and geosciences show (MEOS GEO). 2025. p. D011S029R009.10.2118/227281-MS ↗
48. Mahmoud O, et al. Nanoparticle-based drilling fluids for minimizing formation damage in HP/HT applications. In: SPE international conference and exhibition on formation damage control. 2016. p. D011S005R006.10.2118/178949-MS ↗
49. Mady A, et al. Influence of nanoparticle-based drilling fluids on Egyptian shale swelling—an experimental investigation. In: ADIPEC. 2023. p. D031S081R007.10.2118/216520-MS ↗
50. Mahmoud O, et al. Using ferric oxide and silica nanoparticles to develop modified calcium bentonite drilling fluids. SPE Drill Complet. 2017;33(01):12–26.10.2118/178949-PA ↗
51. Vryzas Z, et al. Smart magnetic drilling fluid with in-situ rheological controllability using Fe3O4 nanoparticles. In: SPE middle east oil & gas show and conference. 2017. p. D031S024R001.10.2118/183906-MS ↗
52. Lei M, et al. Synthesis and characterization of natural rosin-modified silica nanocomposite and its green multifunctional applications for drilling fluid. Colloids Surf A. 2024;702:134994.10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.134994 ↗
53. Rana A, et al. An efficient, cost-effective, and green natural extract in water-based drilling muds for clay swelling inhibition. J Pet Sci Eng. 2022;214:110332.10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110332 ↗
54. Chen L, et al. Mechanism of sodium tripolyphosphate inhibiting the syneresis of HPAM hydrogel. RSC Adv. 2015;5(103):84872–8.10.1039/C5RA19465B ↗
55. Sun F, et al. Effect of composition of HPAM/Chromium(III) acetate gels on delayed gelation time. J Dispersion Sci Technol. 2016;37(6):753–9.10.1080/01932691.2015.1041034 ↗
56. Jia H, et al. Research on the gelation performance of low toxic PEI cross-linking PHPAM gel systems as water shutoff agents in low temperature reservoirs. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2010;49(20):9618–24.10.1021/ie100888q ↗
57. Hazbeh O, et al. Hybrid computing models to predict oil formation volume factor using multilayer perceptron algorithm. J Pet Min Eng. 2021;23(1):17–30.
58. Aghdam SK-y, Kazemi A, Ahmadi M. A laboratory study of a novel bio-based nonionic surfactant to mitigate clay swelling. Petroleum. 2021;7(2):178–87.10.1016/j.petlm.2020.09.002 ↗
59. Khezerlooe-ye Aghdam S, et al. Mechanistic assessment of Seidlitzia Rosmarinus-derived surfactant for restraining shale hydration: a comprehensive experimental investigation. Chem Eng Res Des. 2019;147:570–8.10.1016/j.cherd.2019.05.042 ↗
60. Ganat T, et al. Effect of metal oxide nanoparticles on the properties of nanocomposite gels for water shutoff applications: a review. Arab J Sci Eng. 2025.10.1007/s13369-025-10189-8 ↗
61. Souza TGF, Ciminelli VST, Mohallem NDS. A comparison of TEM and DLS methods to characterize size distribution of ceramic nanoparticles. J Phys Conf Ser. 2016;733(1):012039.10.1088/1742-6596/733/1/012039 ↗
62. Bhattacharjee S. DLS and zeta potential—what they are and what they are not? J Control Release. 2016;235:337–51.10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.06.017 ↗
63. Sharifi O, et al. Laboratory study of the application of a novel bio-based polymer to synthesize aphron drilling fluids. J Pet Sci Technol. 2022;12(2):42–50.
64. Davoodi S, et al. Hybrid machine-learning model for accurate prediction of filtration volume in water-based drilling fluids. Appl Sci. 2024;14(19):9035.10.3390/app14199035 ↗
65. Zhong H, et al. Application of carbon coated bentonite composite as an ultra-high temperature filtration reducer in water-based drilling fluid. J Mol Liq. 2023;375:121360.10.1016/j.molliq.2023.121360 ↗
66. Parizad A, Shahbazi K, Tanha AA. SiO2 nanoparticle and KCl salt effects on filtration and thixotropical behavior of polymeric water based drilling fluid: with zeta potential and size analysis. Results Phys. 2018;9:1656–65.10.1016/j.rinp.2018.04.037 ↗