Experimental workflow to evaluate nanoparticles combined with photon and carbon-ion medical irradiations in spheroids
Source abstract
Abstract
Treatment protocols of cancer combining radiotherapy and nanoparticles are rapidly evolving. To evaluate their efficacy, spheroids provide a 3D in vitro model that better reflects tumor architecture than traditional 2D cell cultures. This article presents a workflow to prepare and characterize spheroids, optimize the protocols for irradiation with medical photon and ion beams and for exposure to nanoparticles, and, finally, to evaluate the effects of radiation, nanoparticles, and their combination on spheroids. Illustrations with HeLa, U-87 MG, and BxPC-3 tumor cell lines and HDFn are reported. Using this workflow, we observed that spheroids exhibit variable cell organization and interstitial spaces, which affect nutrient and oxygen diffusion and, consequently, cell proliferation. These structural differences also affect enzyme diffusion, limiting the applicability of the clonogenic assay in densely packed spheroids, as the assay requires enzymatic disaggregation of the spheroids. The clonogenic assay remains essential for quantitatively comparing spheroid irradiation results with 2D cell culture experiments. It has long been used as the reference method in radiobiology because it assesses mitotic death and long-term proliferative capacity. Protocols were adapted to ensure the feasibility of the clonogenic assay when possible, depending on cell line characteristics. Interstitial spaces also influenced nanoparticle internalization, which was more efficient in spheroids with larger interstitial spaces. This workflow and associated techniques verified the characteristic effect of carbon ion irradiation with a relative biological effectiveness of ~ 3 and demonstrated a ~ 30% radioenhancing effect of platinum nanoparticles at 2 Gy under 6 MV photons.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (86)
Show source-provided references
1. Brown N, Rocchi P, Carmès L, Guthier R, Iyer M, Seban L, et al. Tuning ultrasmall theranostic nanoparticles for MRI contrast and radiation dose amplification. Theranostics. 2023;13:4711–29. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.85663.10.7150/thno.85663 ↗
2. Kalla J, Pfneissl J, Mair T, Tran L, Egger G. A systematic review on the culture methods and applications of 3D tumoroids for cancer research and personalized medicine. Cell Oncol. 2025;48:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13402-024-00960-8.10.1007/s13402-024-00960-8 ↗
3. Isaksson LJ, Pepa M, Zaffaroni M, Marvaso G, Alterio D, Volpe S, et al. Machine learning-based models for prediction of toxicity outcomes in radiotherapy. Front Oncol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00790.10.3389/fonc.2020.00790 ↗
4. Rodriguez A, Alpen EL. Cell survival in spheroids irradiated with heavy-ion beams. Radiat Res. 1981;85:24–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/3575435.10.2307/3575435 ↗
5. Sekihara K, Himuro H, Saito N, Ota Y, Kouro T, Kusano Y, et al. Evaluation of X-ray and carbon-ion beam irradiation with chemotherapy for the treatment of cervical adenocarcinoma cells in 2D and 3D cultures. Cancer Cell Int. 2022;22:391. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-022-02810-9.10.1186/s12935-022-02810-9 ↗
6. Peschke P, Karger CP, Scholz M, Debus J, Huber PE. Relative biological effectiveness of carbon ions for local tumor control of a radioresistant prostate carcinoma in the rat. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2011;79:239–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.1976.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.1976 ↗
7. Lacombe S, Porcel E, Scifoni E. Particle therapy and nanomedicine: state of art and research perspectives. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2017;8:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12645-017-0029-x.10.1186/s12645-017-0029-x ↗
8. Lopez Perez R, Nicolay NH, Wolf J-C, Frister M, Schmezer P, Weber K-J, et al. DNA damage response of clinical carbon ion versus photon radiation in human glioblastoma cells. Radiother Oncol. 2019;133:77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.12.028.10.1016/j.radonc.2018.12.028 ↗
9. Maury P, Mondini M, Chargari C, Darricau A, Shahin M, Ammari S, et al. Clinical transfer of AGuIX®-based radiation treatments for locally advanced cervical cancer: MR quantification and in vitro insights in the NANOCOL clinical trial framework. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2023;50:102676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2023.102676.10.1016/j.nano.2023.102676 ↗
10. Kapałczyńska M, Kolenda T, Przybyła W, Zajączkowska M, Teresiak A, Filas V, et al. 2D and 3D cell cultures—a comparison of different types of cancer cell cultures. Arch Med Sci AMS. 2018;14:910–9. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2016.63743.10.5114/aoms.2016.63743 ↗
11. Van Zundert I, Fortuni B, Rocha S. From 2D to 3D cancer cell models—the enigmas of drug delivery research. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:2236. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10112236.10.3390/nano10112236 ↗
12. Costa EC, Moreira AF, de Melo-Diogo D, Gaspar VM, Carvalho MP, Correia IJ. 3D tumor spheroids: an overview on the tools and techniques used for their analysis. Biotechnol Adv. 2016;34:1427–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.11.002.10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.11.002 ↗
13. Cybulski P, Bravo M, Chen JJ-K, Van Zundert I, Krzyzowska S, Taemaitree F, et al. Nanoparticle accumulation and penetration in 3D tumor models: the effect of size, shape, and surface charge. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2024.1520078.10.3389/fcell.2024.1520078 ↗
14. Yeung T, Georges PC, Flanagan LA, Marg B, Ortiz M, Funaki M, et al. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil Cytoskelet. 2005;60:24–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.20041.10.1002/cm.20041 ↗
15. Poornima K, Francis AP, Hoda M, Eladl MA, Subramanian S, Veeraraghavan VP, et al. Implications of three-dimensional cell culture in cancer therapeutic research. Front Oncol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.891673.10.3389/fonc.2022.891673 ↗
16. Sutherland RM, Durand RE. Radiation response of multicell spheroids–an in vitro tumour model. Curr Top Radiat Res Q. 1976;11:87–139.
17. Doctor A, Seifert V, Ullrich M, Hauser S, Pietzsch J. Three-dimensional cell culture systems in radiopharmaceutical cancer research. Cancers. 2020;12:2765. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102765.10.3390/cancers12102765 ↗
18. Nayak P, Bentivoglio V, Varani M, Signore A. Three-dimensional in vitro tumor spheroid models for evaluation of anticancer therapy: recent updates. Cancers. 2023;15:4846. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15194846.10.3390/cancers15194846 ↗
19. Jensen C, Teng Y. Is it time to start transitioning from 2D to 3D cell culture? Front Mol Biosci. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2020.00033.10.3389/fmolb.2020.00033 ↗
20. Bromma K, Beckham W, Chithrani DB. Utilizing two-dimensional monolayer and three-dimensional spheroids to enhance radiotherapeutic potential by combining gold nanoparticles and docetaxel. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2023;14:80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12645-023-00231-5.10.1186/s12645-023-00231-5 ↗
21. Durand M, Chateau A, Jubréaux J, Devy J, Paquot H, Laurent G, et al. Radiosensitization with gadolinium chelate-coated gold nanoparticles prevents aggressiveness and invasiveness in glioblastoma. Int J Nanomed. 2023;18:243–61. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S375918.10.2147/IJN.S375918 ↗
22. Alhussan A, Jackson N, Chow N, Gete E, Wretham N, Dos Santos N, et al. In vitro and in vivo synergetic radiotherapy with gold nanoparticles and docetaxel for pancreatic cancer. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16:713. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16060713.10.3390/pharmaceutics16060713 ↗
23. Suryaprakash S, Lao Y-H, Cho H-Y, Li M, Ji HY, Shao D, et al. Engineered mesenchymal stem cell/nanomedicine spheroid as an active drug delivery platform for combinational glioblastoma therapy. Nano Lett. 2019;19:1701–5. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04697.10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04697 ↗
24. Jeon H, Zhu R, Kim G, Wang Y. Chirality-enhanced transport and drug delivery of graphene nanocarriers to tumor-like cellular spheroid. Front Chem. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2023.1207579.10.3389/fchem.2023.1207579 ↗
25. Vakhshiteh F, Bagheri Z, Soleimani M, Ahvaraki A, Pournemat P, Alavi SE, et al. Heterotypic tumor spheroids: a platform for nanomedicine evaluation. J Nanobiotechnol. 2023;21:249. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-023-02021-y.10.1186/s12951-023-02021-y ↗
26. Oike T, Hirota Y, Dewi Maulany Darwis N, Shibata A, Ohno T. Comparison of clonogenic survival data obtained by pre- and post-irradiation methods. J Pers Med. 2020;10:171. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm10040171.10.3390/jpm10040171 ↗
27. Franken NAP, Rodermond HM, Stap J, Haveman J, van Bree C. Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:2315–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.339.10.1038/nprot.2006.339 ↗
28. Herzog E, Casey A, Lyng FM, Chambers G, Byrne HJ, Davoren M. A new approach to the toxicity testing of carbon-based nanomaterials–the clonogenic assay. Toxicol Lett. 2007;174:49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.08.009.10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.08.009 ↗
29. Hillegass JM, Shukla A, Lathrop SA, MacPherson MB, Fukagawa NK, Mossman BT. Assessing nanotoxicity in cells in vitro. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2010;2:219–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.54.10.1002/wnan.54 ↗
30. Rafehi H, Orlowski C, Georgiadis GT, Ververis K, El-Osta A, Karagiannis TC. Clonogenic assay: adherent cells. J Vis Exp JoVE. 2011. https://doi.org/10.3791/2573.10.3791/2573 ↗
31. Salata GC, Hirokawa CM, de Melo GB, Malagó ID, Nunes JR, Passos JS, et al. In vitro methodologies to evaluate nanocarriers for cancer treatment: where are we? Cancer Nanotechnol. 2025;16:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12645-025-00321-6.10.1186/s12645-025-00321-6 ↗
32. Chermat R, Refet-Mollof E, Kamio Y, Carrier J-F, Wong P, Gervais T. Brachytherapy on-a-chip: a clinically-relevant approach for radiotherapy testing in 3d biology. Lab Chip. 2024;24:2335–46. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4lc00032c.10.1039/d4lc00032c ↗
33. Bavoux M, Kamio Y, Vigneux-Foley E, Lafontaine J, Najyb O, Refet-Mollof E, et al. X-ray on chip: Quantifying therapeutic synergies between radiotherapy and anticancer drugs using soft tissue sarcoma tumor spheroids. Radiother Oncol. 2021;157:175–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.018.10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.018 ↗
34. Karlsson H, Senkowski W, Fryknäs M, Mansoori S, Linder S, Gullbo J, et al. A novel tumor spheroid model identifies selective enhancement of radiation by an inhibitor of oxidative phosphorylation. Oncotarget. 2019;10:5372–82. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27166.10.18632/oncotarget.27166 ↗
35. Patra B, Lafontaine J, Bavoux M, Zerouali K, Glory A, Ahanj M, et al. On-chip combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy testing on soft-tissue sarcoma spheroids to study cell death using flow cytometry and clonogenic assay. Sci Rep. 2019;9:2214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38666-9.10.1038/s41598-019-38666-9 ↗
36. Salado-Leza D, Porcel E, Yang X, Štefančíková L, Bolsa-Ferruz M, Savina F, et al. Green one-step synthesis of medical nanoagents for advanced radiation therapy. Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2020;13:61–76. https://doi.org/10.2147/NSA.S257392.10.2147/NSA.S257392 ↗
37. Yang X, Salado-Leza D, Porcel E, González-Vargas CR, Savina F, Dragoe D, et al. A facile one-pot synthesis of versatile pegylated platinum nanoflowers and their application in radiation therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:1619. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051619.10.3390/ijms21051619 ↗
38. Zhao D, Ran S, Constantinescu A, Hahn EW, Mason RP. Tumor oxygen dynamics: correlation of in vivo MRI with histological findings. Neoplasia. 2003;5:308–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1476-5586(03)80024-6.10.1016/S1476-5586(03)80024-6 ↗
39. Däster S, Amatruda N, Calabrese D, Ivanek R, Turrini E, Droeser RA, et al. Induction of hypoxia and necrosis in multicellular tumor spheroids is associated with resistance to chemotherapy treatment. Oncotarget. 2016;8:1725–36. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.13857.10.18632/oncotarget.13857 ↗
40. Bach C, Glasow A, Baran-Schmidt R, Oppermann H, Bach C, Meixensberger J, et al. Rapid and reproducible generation of glioblastoma spheroids for high-throughput drug screening. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1471012.10.3389/fbioe.2024.1471012 ↗
41. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63:11–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21166.10.3322/caac.21166 ↗
42. Souchek JJ, Baine MJ, Lin C, Rachagani S, Gupta S, Kaur S, et al. Unbiased analysis of pancreatic cancer radiation resistance reveals cholesterol biosynthesis as a novel target for radiosensitisation. Br J Cancer. 2014;111:1139–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.385.10.1038/bjc.2014.385 ↗
43. Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Waite K, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2014–2018. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23:iii1–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab200.10.1093/neuonc/noab200 ↗
44. Sun C, Du Z, Yang W, Wang Q. Transglutaminase 2 nuclear localization enhances glioblastoma radiation resistance. Discov Oncol. 2025;16:952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-025-02599-9.10.1007/s12672-025-02599-9 ↗
45. Fischer AH, Jacobson KA, Rose J, Zeller R. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue and cell sections. CSH Protoc. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot4986. 2008:pdb.prot4986.10.1101/pdb.prot4986 ↗
46. Qian H, Baglamis S, Redeker F, Raaijman J, Hoebe RA, Sheraton VM, et al. High-content and high-throughput clonogenic survival assay using fluorescence barcoding. Cancers. 2023;15:4772. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15194772.10.3390/cancers15194772 ↗
47. Douglas BG, Fowler JF. The effect of multiple small doses of X rays on skin reactions in the mouse and a basic interpretation. Radiat Res. 1976;66:401–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/3574407.10.2307/3574407 ↗
48. Tubiana M. Introduction to radiobiology. CRC Press; 2005.10.4324/9780203983669 ↗
49. Deacon J, Peckham MJ, Steel GG. The radioresponsiveness of human tumours and the initial slope ofthe cell survival curve. Radiother Oncol. 1984;2:317–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(84)80074-2.10.1016/S0167-8140(84)80074-2 ↗
50. Subiel A, Ashmore R, Schettino G. Standards and methodologies for characterizing radiobiological impact of high-Z nanoparticles. Theranostics. 2016;6:1651–71. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.15019.10.7150/thno.15019 ↗
51. R: The R Project for Statistical Computing. [cited 2026 Jan 29]. https://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 29 Jan 2026.
52. Braselmann H, Michna A, Heß J, Unger K. CFAssay: statistical analysis of the colony formation assay. Radiat Oncol. 2015;10:223. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0529-y.10.1186/s13014-015-0529-y ↗
53. Rizzo LY, Theek B, Storm G, Kiessling F, Lammers T. Recent progress in nanomedicine: therapeutic, diagnostic and theranostic applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013;24:1159–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2013.02.020.10.1016/j.copbio.2013.02.020 ↗
54. Yang X, Tran VL, Remita H, Savina F, Denis C, Kereselidze D, et al. Pharmacokinetics derived from PET imaging of inspiring radio-enhancer platinum nanoparticles. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med. 2022;46:102603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2022.102603.10.1016/j.nano.2022.102603 ↗
55. Porcel E, Liehn S, Remita H, Usami N, Kobayashi K, Furusawa Y, et al. Platinum nanoparticles: a promising material for future cancer therapy? Nanotechnology. 2010;21:085103. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/21/8/085103.10.1088/0957-4484/21/8/085103 ↗
56. Graf BW, Boppart SA. Imaging and analysis of three-dimensional cell culture models. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;591:211–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-404-3_13.10.1007/978-1-60761-404-3_13 ↗
57. Boutin ME, Hoffman-Kim D. Application and assessment of optical clearing methods for imaging of tissue-engineered neural stem cell spheres. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2015;21:292–302. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEC.2014.0296.10.1089/ten.TEC.2014.0296 ↗
58. Kabadi PK, Vantangoli MM, Rodd AL, Leary E, Madnick SJ, Morgan JR, et al. Into the depths: techniques for in vitro three-dimensional microtissue visualization. Biotechniques. 2015;59:279–86. https://doi.org/10.2144/000114353.10.2144/000114353 ↗
59. Leary E, Rhee C, Wilks BT, Morgan JR. Quantitative live-cell confocal imaging of 3D spheroids in a high throughput format. SLAS Technol Transl Life Sci Innov. 2018;23:231–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/2472630318756058.10.1177/2472630318756058 ↗
60. Kim S-K, Jang SD, Kim H, Chung S, Park JK, Kuh H-J. Phenotypic heterogeneity and plasticity of cancer cell migration in a pancreatic tumor three-dimensional culture model. Cancers. 2020;12:1305. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12051305.10.3390/cancers12051305 ↗
61. Stadler M, Scherzer M, Walter S, Holzner S, Pudelko K, Riedl A, et al. Exclusion from spheroid formation identifies loss of essential cell-cell adhesion molecules in colon cancer cells. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1151. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19384-0.10.1038/s41598-018-19384-0 ↗
62. Smyrek I, Mathew B, Fischer SC, Lissek SM, Becker S, Stelzer EHK. E-cadherin, actin, microtubules and FAK dominate different spheroid formation phases and important elements of tissue integrity. Biol Open. 2018;8:bio037051. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.037051.10.1242/bio.037051 ↗
63. Molika P, Leetanaporn K, Chiangjong W, Choochuen P, Navakanitworakul R. Proteomic analysis reveals cadherin, actin, and focal adhesion molecule-mediated formation of cervical cancer spheroids. Cells. 2024;13:2004. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13232004.10.3390/cells13232004 ↗
64. Freyer JP, Sutherland RM. Regulation of growth saturation and development of necrosis in EMT6/Ro multicellular spheroids by the glucose and oxygen supply. Cancer Res. 1986;46:3504–12.
65. Mueller-Klieser W, Freyer JP, Sutherland RM. Influence of glucose and oxygen supply conditions on the oxygenation of multicellular spheroids. Br J Cancer. 1986;53:345–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1986.58.10.1038/bjc.1986.58 ↗
66. Nederman T, Acker H, Carlsson J. Penetration of substances into tumor tissue: a methodological study with microelectrodes and cellular spheroids. In Vitro. 1983;19:479–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02619595.10.1007/BF02619595 ↗
67. Goodman TT, Olive PL, Pun SH. Increased nanoparticle penetration in collagenase-treated multicellular spheroids. Int J Nanomed. 2007;2:265–74.
68. Jena PV, Shamay Y, Shah J, Roxbury D, Paknejad N, Heller DA. Photoluminescent carbon nanotubes interrogate the permeability of multicellular tumor spheroids. Carbon. 2016;97:99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.08.024.10.1016/j.carbon.2015.08.024 ↗
69. Hayashi S, Sasaki Y, Kubo H, Sawada S, Kinoshita N, Marukawa E, et al. Construction of hybrid cell spheroids using cell-sized cross-linked nanogel microspheres as an artificial extracellular matrix. ACS Appl Bio Mater Am Chem Soc. 2021;4:7848–55. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.1c00796.10.1021/acsabm.1c00796 ↗
70. Watson RL, Spalding AC, Zielske SP, Morgan M, Kim AC, Bommer GT, et al. GSK3β and β-catenin modulate radiation cytotoxicity in pancreatic cancer. Neoplasia. 2010;12:357–65. https://doi.org/10.1593/neo.92112.10.1593/neo.92112 ↗
71. Seshacharyulu P, Baine MJ, Souchek JJ, Menning M, Kaur S, Yan Y, et al. Biological determinants of radioresistance and their remediation in pancreatic cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2017;1868:69–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.02.003.10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.02.003 ↗
72. Kraft G. Tumor therapy with heavy charged particles. Prog Part Nucl Phys. 2000;45:S473–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-6410(00)00112-5.10.1016/S0146-6410(00)00112-5 ↗
73. Koike S, Ando K, Oohira C, Fukawa T, Lee R, Takai N, et al. Relative biological effectiveness of 290 MeV/u carbon ions for the growth delay of a radioresistant murine fibrosarcoma. J Radiat Res. 2002;43:247–55. https://doi.org/10.1269/jrr.43.247.10.1269/jrr.43.247 ↗
74. Guerra DB, Oliveira EMN, Sonntag AR, Sbaraine P, Fay AP, Morrone FB, et al. Intercomparison of radiosensitization induced by gold and iron oxide nanoparticles in human glioblastoma cells irradiated by 6 MV photons. Sci Rep. 2022;12:9602. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13368-x.10.1038/s41598-022-13368-x ↗
75. Nagano T, Matsuya Y, Kaida A, Nojima H, Furuta T, Sato K, et al. In vitro and in silico study of biological effects on cancer cells in the presence of metallic materials during radiotherapy. J Radiat Res. 2024;65:628–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrae062.10.1093/jrr/rrae062 ↗
76. Bell HS, Whittle IR, Walker M, Leaver HA, Wharton SB. The development of necrosis and apoptosis in glioma: experimental findings using spheroid culture systems. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2001;27:291–304. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-1846.2001.00319.x.10.1046/j.0305-1846.2001.00319.x ↗
77. Breslin S, O’Driscoll L. Three-dimensional cell culture: the missing link in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2013;18:240–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2012.10.003.10.1016/j.drudis.2012.10.003 ↗
78. Carrasco-Mantis A, Castro-Abril H, Randelovic T, Ochoa I, Doblaré M, Sanz-Herrera JA. A mechanobiological model for tumor spheroid evolution with application to glioblastoma: a continuum multiphysics approach. Comput Biol Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.08.463617.10.1101/2021.10.08.463617 ↗
79. Shah S, D’Souza GGM. Modeling tumor microenvironment complexity in vitro: spheroids as physiologically relevant tumor models and strategies for their analysis. Cells. 2025;14:732. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14100732.10.3390/cells14100732 ↗
80. Miroshnikova YA, Mouw JK, Barnes JM, Pickup MW, Lakins JN, Kim Y, et al. Tissue mechanics promote IDH1-dependent HIF1α-tenascin C feedback to regulate glioblastoma aggression. Nat Cell Biol. 2016;18:1336–45. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3429.10.1038/ncb3429 ↗
81. Durymanov M, Kroll C, Permyakova A, Reineke J. Role of endocytosis in nanoparticle penetration of 3D pancreatic cancer spheroids. Mol Pharm. 2019;16:1074–82. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b01078.10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b01078 ↗
82. Amirrah IN, Lokanathan Y, Zulkiflee I, Wee MFMR, Motta A, Fauzi MB. A comprehensive review on collagen type I development of biomaterials for tissue engineering: from biosynthesis to bioscaffold. Biomedicines. 2022;10:2307. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10092307.10.3390/biomedicines10092307 ↗
83. Gomes A, Guillaume L, Grimes DR, Fehrenbach J, Lobjois V, Ducommun B. Oxygen partial pressure is a rate-limiting parameter for cell proliferation in 3D spheroids grown in physioxic culture condition. PLOS ONE Public Libr Sci. 2016;11:e0161239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161239.10.1371/journal.pone.0161239 ↗
84. Bull JA, Mech F, Quaiser T, Waters SL, Byrne HM. Mathematical modelling reveals cellular dynamics within tumour spheroids. PLOS Comput Biol Public Libr Sci. 2020;16:e1007961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007961.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007961 ↗
85. Sung W, Ye S-J, McNamara AL, McMahon SJ, Hainfeld J, Shin J, et al. Dependence of gold nanoparticle radiosensitization on cell geometry. Nanoscale R Soc Chem. 2017;9:5843–53. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR01024A.10.1039/C7NR01024A ↗
86. Musielak M, Boś-Liedke A, Piwocka O, Kowalska K, Markiewicz R, Szymkowiak B, et al. The role of functionalization and size of gold nanoparticles in the response of MCF-7 breast cancer cells to ionizing radiation comparing 2D and 3D in vitro models. Pharmaceutics. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15030862.10.3390/pharmaceutics15030862 ↗