Feasibility analysis and development trend of nanomaterials for the treatment of pancreatic cancer
Source abstract
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive disease that poses a significant threat to human health. Although conventional chemotherapy remains an effective treatment, it is often associated with severe side effects, underscoring the need for more effective cancer therapies. In this study, we analyzed the keywords of past studies, the countries with the highest number of publications, the leading journals, prominent authors, and collaborations between countries, authors, and journals, as well as the impact factors of relevant literature. The aim was to explore the trends in the use of nanomaterials for the treatment of pancreatic cancer, enabling researchers to review past achievements and gain a better understanding of future research directions. Relevant research articles were sourced from core Web of Science databases, and VOSviewer and CiteSpace visualization tools were employed to reveal the intrinsic links between the information. Research on the use of nanomaterials for the therapy of pancreatic cancer has been growing since the twenty-first century, particularly from 2018 to the present. The United States has become a leader in this field, with the highest number of publications and the most published authors. Additionally, a 2018 study published in Nature demonstrated that patients with insufficient CD8 + T-cell infiltration in the pancreatic cancer tumor microenvironment (TME) had significantly lower survival rates (HR = 2.5, p < 0.001). And CSF1R inhibitors combined with a PD-1 antibody resulted in 60% tumor shrinkage in a mouse model. These findings suggest that research on the tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy is poised to be a key focus of future studies, offering new hope for pancreatic cancer patients.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Sang CY, et al. Potential anti-tumor activity of Nardoguaianone L isolated from Nardostachys jatamansi DC. in SW1990 cells. Molecules. 2022;27(21):7490.10.3390/molecules27217490 ↗
2. Zhang D, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the process of CA19-9 production and dynamics of the immune microenvironment between CA19-9 (+) and CA19-9 (-) PDAC. Chin Med J. 2024;137(20):2415–28.10.1097/CM9.0000000000003130 ↗
3. Baker JG, et al. Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, β-blockers, and Antihistamines: A Clinical Trial Is Needed. Function (Oxf). 2025;6(1):zqae050.10.1093/function/zqae050 ↗
4. Liu H, et al. CA19-9 change during neoadjuvant therapy may guide the need for additional adjuvant therapy following resected pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(10):3950–60.10.1245/s10434-020-08468-9 ↗
5. Seufferlein T, Ettrich TJ. Treatment of pancreatic cancer-neoadjuvant treatment in resectable pancreatic cancer (PDAC). Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;4:21.10.21037/tgh.2019.03.05 ↗
6. He Y, et al. Innovative utilization of cell membrane-coated nanoparticles in precision cancer therapy. Exploration. 2024;4(6):20230164.10.1002/EXP.20230164 ↗
7. Yao Y, et al. Ferroptosis-based drug delivery system as a new therapeutic opportunity for brain tumors. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1084289.10.3389/fonc.2023.1084289 ↗
8. Wang N, et al. Metabolism: an important player in glioma survival and development. Discov Oncol. 2024;15(1):577.10.1007/s12672-024-01402-5 ↗
9. Parajuli D. MXenes-polymer nanocomposites for biomedical applications: fundamentals and future perspectives. Front Chem. 2024;12:1400375.10.3389/fchem.2024.1400375 ↗
10. Hussain Z, Nigri J, Tomasini R. The cellular and biological impact of extracellular vesicles in pancreatic cancer. Cancers. 2021;13(12):3040.10.3390/cancers13123040 ↗
11. Huynh AS, et al. Intraoperative guidance of pancreatic cancer resection using a toll-like receptor 2-targeted fluorescence molecular imaging agent. Cancer Res Commun. 2024;4(11):2877–87.10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-24-0244 ↗
12. Papadakos SP, et al. Unveiling the Yin-Yang balance of M1 and M2 macrophages in hepatocellular carcinoma: role of exosomes in tumor microenvironment and immune modulation. Cells. 2023;12(16):2036.10.3390/cells12162036 ↗
13. Pérez-Nicolás C, Pecci-Lloret MP, Guerrero-Gironés J. Use and efficacy of mouthwashes in elderly patients: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Ann Anat. 2023;246:152026.10.1016/j.aanat.2022.152026 ↗
14. Tian Y, Liu D. A bibliometric study of identity construction in English writing for academic purposes. Front Psychol. 2024;15:1499917.10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1499917 ↗
15. Hu D, et al. Bibliometric analysis of research trends and advancements in medicinal plant microbiome. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1495198.10.3389/fpls.2024.1495198 ↗
16. Liu M, et al. Global research hotspots and trends of theta burst stimulation from 2004 to 2023: a bibliometric analysis. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1469877.10.3389/fneur.2024.1469877 ↗
17. Bai M, et al. Insights into research on myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury from 2012 to 2021: a bibliometric analysis. Eur J Med Res. 2023;28(1):17.10.1186/s40001-022-00967-7 ↗
18. Wang M, et al. Analysis of current trends in angiogenesis research for wound healing: a bibliometric study from 2013 to 2023. Heliyon. 2024;10(12):e32311.10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32311 ↗
19. Ling LX, Ouyang Y, Hu Y. Research trends on nanomaterials in gastric cancer: a bibliometric analysis from 2004 to 2023. J Nanobiotechnology. 2023;21(1):248.10.1186/s12951-023-02033-8 ↗
20. Li G, et al. The research landscape of ferroptosis in cancer: a bibliometric analysis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:841724.10.3389/fcell.2022.841724 ↗
21. Meng H, et al. Use of a lipid-coated mesoporous silica nanoparticle platform for synergistic gemcitabine and paclitaxel delivery to human pancreatic cancer in mice. ACS Nano. 2015;9(4):3540–57.10.1021/acsnano.5b00510 ↗
22. Patra CR, et al. Fabrication of gold nanoparticles for targeted therapy in pancreatic cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2010;62(3):346–61.10.1016/j.addr.2009.11.007 ↗
23. Lu J, et al. Nano-enabled pancreas cancer immunotherapy using immunogenic cell death and reversing immunosuppression. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1811.10.1038/s41467-017-01651-9 ↗
24. Patra CR, et al. Targeted delivery of gemcitabine to pancreatic adenocarcinoma using cetuximab as a targeting agent. Cancer Res. 2008;68(6):1970–8.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6102 ↗
25. Ye Y, et al. Microneedles integrated with pancreatic cells and synthetic glucose-signal amplifiers for smart insulin delivery. Adv Mater. 2016;28(16):3115–21.10.1002/adma.201506025 ↗
26. Adiseshaiah PP, et al. Nanomedicine strategies to overcome the pathophysiological barriers of pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;13(12):750–65.10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.119 ↗
27. Li TD, et al. An ultrasensitive polydopamine bi-functionalized SERS immunoassay for exosome-based diagnosis and classification of pancreatic cancer. Chem Sci. 2018;9(24):5372–82.10.1039/C8SC01611A ↗
28. Meng H, et al. Two-wave nanotherapy to target the stroma and optimize gemcitabine delivery to a human pancreatic cancer model in mice. ACS Nano. 2013;7(11):10048–65.10.1021/nn404083m ↗
29. Kesharwani P, et al. Hyaluronic acid-conjugated polyamidoamine dendrimers for targeted delivery of 3,4-difluorobenzylidene curcumin to CD44 overexpressing pancreatic cancer cells. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2015;136:413–23.10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.09.043 ↗
30. Su MJ, Aldawsari H, Amiji M. Pancreatic cancer cell exosome-mediated macrophage reprogramming and the role of MicroRNAs 155 and 125b2 transfection using nanoparticle delivery systems. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30110.10.1038/srep30110 ↗
31. Gomis MKS, et al. A scientometric analysis of global scientific literature on learning resources in higher education. Heliyon. 2023;9(4):e15438.10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15438 ↗
32. Słotwiński R, Lech G, Słotwińska SM. Molecular aspects of pancreatic cancer: focus on reprogrammed metabolism in a nutrient-deficient environment and potential therapeutic targets. Cent Eur J Immunol. 2021;46(2):258–63.10.5114/ceji.2021.107027 ↗
33. Zhang X, et al. Combination cancer immunotherapy targeting TNFR2 and PD-1/PD-L1 signaling reduces immunosuppressive effects in the microenvironment of pancreatic tumors. J Immunother Cancer. 2022;10(3):e003982.10.1136/jitc-2021-003982 ↗
34. Meng H, et al. Correction to use of a lipid-coated mesoporous silica nanoparticle platform for synergistic gemcitabine and paclitaxel delivery to human pancreatic cancer in mice. ACS Nano. 2016;10(6):6416.10.1021/acsnano.6b03110 ↗
35. Shimomura O, et al. Triple modal treatment comprising with proton beam radiation, hyperthermia, and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I/II study protocol (TT-LAP trial). BMC Cancer. 2023;23(1):624.10.1186/s12885-023-11110-y ↗
36. Roviello G, et al. Association between neutropenia and survival to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):19281.10.1038/s41598-020-76465-9 ↗
37. Chiramel J, et al. Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor in addition to chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(5):909.10.3390/ijms18050909 ↗
38. Devi S, et al. Tracking academic contributions to Women’s empowerment in Malaysia: a bibliometric investigation. Heliyon. 2024;10(17):e37052.10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37052 ↗
39. Wang Y, et al. The role of nanomaterials in revolutionizing ischemic stroke treatment: current trends and future prospects. iScience. 2024;27(12):111373.10.1016/j.isci.2024.111373 ↗
40. Shang S, et al. Targeted therapy of kidney disease with nanoparticle drug delivery materials. Bioact Mater. 2024;37:206–21.
41. Tao Y, et al. Magnetic-driven hydrogel microrobots for promoting osteosarcoma chemo-therapy with synthetic lethality strategy. Front Chem. 2024;12:1386076.10.3389/fchem.2024.1386076 ↗
42. Hu X, et al. Galactose-modified PH-sensitive niosomes for controlled release and hepatocellular carcinoma target delivery of Tanshinone IIA. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2021;22(3):96.10.1208/s12249-021-01973-4 ↗
43. Wang Z, et al. Therapeutic effect of total glucosides of paeony on IgA vasculitis nephritis: progress and prospects. Mol Biol Rep. 2024;52(1):13.10.1007/s11033-024-10041-6 ↗
44. Bubnov AA, et al. Laser-ablative synthesis of silicon-iron composite nanoparticles for theranostic applications. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2023;13(15):2256.10.3390/nano13152256 ↗
45. Shao L, Xi Y, Weng Y. Recent advances in PLA-based antibacterial food packaging and its applications. Molecules. 2022;27(18):5953.10.3390/molecules27185953 ↗
46. Fu P, et al. Extracellular vesicles as delivery systems at nano-/micro-scale. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;179:113910.10.1016/j.addr.2021.113910 ↗
47. Munawaroh HSH, et al. Bacterial cellulose nanocrystal as drug delivery system for overcoming the biological barrier of cyano-phycocyanin: a biomedical application of microbial product. Bioengineered. 2023;14(1):2252226.10.1080/21655979.2023.2252226 ↗
48. Catenacci L, et al. Effect of lipid nanoparticle physico-chemical properties and composition on their interaction with the immune system. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(12):1521.10.3390/pharmaceutics16121521 ↗