Comment on “Interplay of Structural and Optoelectronic Properties in Formamidinium Mixed Tin‐Lead Triiodide Perovskites”
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Studying optoelectronic properties in FAPb1−xSnxI3 and in FA0.83Cs0.17Pb1−xSnxI3 perovskites as a function of the lead:tin content, Parrott et al. (2018) and Savill et al. (2020) observed the broadest luminescence linewidth and the largest Stokes shift in mixed compositions with Sn <25% and with >85%. It is in contrast to the intuitive expectation of the largest effects of alloy disorder for the 50:50 composition. This comment addresses the alloy disorder caused by statistical local spatial fluctuations of the alloy composition and shows that the largest effects of alloy disorder for perfectly random fluctuations in FAPb1−xSnxI3 and FA0.83Cs0.17Pb1−xSnxI3 are, in fact, expected for x < 0.25 and for x > 0.85. It can be one of the reasons why Pb‐rich and Sn‐rich Sn‐Pb perovskites typically show shorter photoluminescence (PL) lifetimes, broader emission, increased Stokes shifts, reduced PL quantum yield, and higher Urbach tails, compared with their lead‐only counterparts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Optical properties and cooling technologies in crystalline materials · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Physics and Materials Sciences Center Philipps‐Universität Marburg 35032 Marburg Germany
Department für Chemie Universität zu Köln Greinstraße 4‐6 50939 Köln Germany
Trainee at the Faculty of Physics Philipps‐Universität Marburg 35032 Marburg Germany
Rzhanov Institute of Semiconductor Physics Novosibirsk 630090 Russia
Department of Physics Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk 630090 Russia
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adfm.20180280310.1002/adfm.201802803 ↗
2. 10.1002/adfm.20200559410.1002/adfm.202005594 ↗
3. Alferov Z. I. · Sov. Phys. Semicond. · 1969 · 2 · 1001
4. Baranovskii S. D. · Sov. Phys. Semicond. · 1978 · 12 · 1328
5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.770110.1103/PhysRevB.41.7701 ↗
6. 10.1002/pssr.20160035210.1002/pssr.201600352 ↗
7. 10.1002/aelm.20210019610.1002/aelm.202100196 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.12531810.1103/PhysRevB.86.125318 ↗
9. 10.1039/D0EE00132E10.1039/D0EE00132E ↗
10. 10.1039/C6TA06607K10.1039/C6TA06607K ↗
11. Zong Y. · Angew.Chem. · 2017 · 129 · 1832
12. 10.1039/D0CP00496K10.1039/D0CP00496K ↗
13. 10.1039/D0RA06028C10.1039/D0RA06028C ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.04531810.1103/PhysRevB.69.045318 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20170086010.1002/adfm.201700860 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0077610.1021/acsenergylett.1c00776 ↗
17. Bandara R. M. I. · Energy Environ. Mater. · 2021 · 0 · 1
18. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0042210.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00422 ↗
19. 10.1126/science.aaf971710.1126/science.aaf9717 ↗