journal article·2009-08-24

Restorable Type Conversion of Carbon Nanotube Transistor Using Pyrolytically Controlled Antioxidizing Photosynthesis Coenzyme

Bo Ram Kang, Woo Jong Yu, Ki Kang Kim, Hyeon Ki Park, Soo Min Kim, Yongjin Park, Gunn Kim, Hyeon‐Jin Shin, Un Jeong Kim, Eun‐Hong Lee, Jae‐Young Choi, Young Hee Lee

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 19· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Here, a pyrolytically controlled antioxidizing photosynthesis coenzyme, β‐Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, reduced dipotassium salt (NADH) for a stable n‐type dopant for carbon nanotube (CNT) transistors is proposed. A strong electron transfer from NADH, mainly nicotinamide, to CNTs takes place during pyrolysis so that not only the type conversion from p‐type to n‐type is realized with 100% of reproducibility but also the on/off ratio of the transistor is significantly improved by increasing on‐current and/or decreasing off‐current. The device was stable up to a few months with negligible current changes under ambient conditions. The n‐type characteristics were completely recovered to an initial doping level after reheat treatment of the device.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced battery technologies research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nl034841q10.1021/nl034841q ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.294110.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2941 ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat76910.1038/nmat769 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.148087710.1063/1.1480877 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.168269110.1063/1.1682691 ↗
6. 10.1021/nl025639a10.1021/nl025639a ↗
7. 10.1021/nl803066v10.1021/nl803066v ↗
8. 10.1126/science.106582410.1126/science.1065824 ↗
9. 10.1021/nl025647r10.1021/nl025647r ↗
10. 10.1126/science.112279710.1126/science.1122797 ↗
11. 10.1073/pnas.070973410510.1073/pnas.0709734105 ↗
12. 10.1088/1367-2630/10/1/01303410.1088/1367-2630/10/1/013034 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.233210.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2332 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.146770210.1063/1.1467702 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.25680510.1103/PhysRevLett.87.256805 ↗
16. 10.1021/nl048055c10.1021/nl048055c ↗
17. 10.1021/nl049612y10.1021/nl049612y ↗
18. 10.1142/S179329200600013610.1142/S1793292006000136 ↗
19. 10.1126/science.275.5297.18710.1126/science.275.5297.187 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.10680110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.106801 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.290.5496.155210.1126/science.290.5496.1552 ↗
22. 10.1021/ja016967010.1021/ja0169670 ↗
23. 10.1021/nl048905o10.1021/nl048905o ↗
24. 10.1021/nl015606f10.1021/nl015606f ↗
25. 10.1063/1.213541510.1063/1.2135415 ↗
26. Nelson D. L. · 2000
27. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2001.tb00570.x10.1111/j.1574-6976.2001.tb00570.x ↗
28. 10.1042/bst031109510.1042/bst0311095 ↗
29. Nicholls D. G. · 2002
30. 10.1038/nmat136710.1038/nmat1367 ↗
31. 10.1096/fj.00-0823hyp10.1096/fj.00-0823hyp ↗
32. 10.5483/BMBRep.2004.37.4.41610.5483/BMBRep.2004.37.4.416 ↗
33. The choice of CNT‐TFTs synthesized by CVD was practical in our approach since it provides numerous sets of devices for doping tests. The doping efficiency is supposedly poorer than that of individual devices. This method is fully adoptable for individual CNT device with better doping performance.
34. Atkins P. · Physical Chemistry, Oxford, UK · 2002
35. Dawson M. C. · 1987
36. 10.1002/cbdv.20049010910.1002/cbdv.200490109 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.tibs.2006.11.00610.1016/j.tibs.2006.11.006 ↗
38. 10.1038/nnano.2007.7710.1038/nnano.2007.77 ↗
39. 10.1021/nl071710710.1021/nl0717107 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.170181510.1063/1.1701815 ↗
41. 10.1021/ja054108w10.1021/ja054108w ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
43. MATERIALS STUDIO (version 4.1) of Accelrys Inc. San Diego USA.
44. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.56610.1103/PhysRevLett.45.566 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.23.504810.1103/PhysRevB.23.5048 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.142510.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1425 ↗