journal article·2018-02

Microcavity Structure Provides High‐Performance (>8.1%) Semitransparent and Colorful Organic Photovoltaics

Jong‐Hong Lu, Yi‐Hung Lin, Bing‐Huang Jiang, Chun‐Hung Yeh, Jui‐Chih Kao, Chih‐Ping Chen

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 28· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract High‐performance colored aesthetic semitransparent organic photovoltaics (OPVs) featuring a silver/indium tin oxide/silver (Ag/ITO/Ag) microcavity structure are prepared. By precisely controlling the thickness of the ITO layer, OPV devices exhibiting high transparency and a wide and high‐purity color gamut are obtained: blue (B), green (G), yellow‐green (YG), yellow (Y), orange (O), and red (R). The power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of the G, YG, and Y color devices are greater than 8% (AM 1.5G irradiation, 100 mW cm−2) with maximum transmittances (TMAX) of greater than 14.5%. An optimized PCE of 8.2% was obtained for the YG OPV [CIE 1931 coordinates: (0.364, 0.542)], with a value of TMAX of 17.3% (at 561 nm). As far as it is known, this performance is the highest ever reported for a transparent colorful OPV. Such high transparency and desired transmitted colors, which can perspective see the clear images, suggest great potential for use in building‐integrated photovoltaic applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Engineering Ming Chi University of Technology New Taipei City 243 Taiwan

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adem.20150034810.1002/adem.201500348 ↗
2. 10.1039/C5TA07357J10.1039/C5TA07357J ↗
3. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.01.03610.1016/j.solmat.2016.01.036 ↗
4. 10.1039/C6TA01016D10.1039/C6TA01016D ↗
5. 10.1039/C4EE03132F10.1039/C4EE03132F ↗
6. 10.1002/aenm.20150252910.1002/aenm.201502529 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20160415510.1002/adma.201604155 ↗
8. 10.1039/C5EE03874J10.1039/C5EE03874J ↗
9. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.4810.1038/nenergy.2016.48 ↗
10. Zhang H. · Adv. Mater. · 2017 · 29 · 1605469
11. 10.1002/adfm.20160546910.1002/adfm.201605469 ↗
12. 10.1038/srep0703610.1038/srep07036 ↗
13. 10.1039/C5MH00126A10.1039/C5MH00126A ↗
14. 10.1039/C6TA10981K10.1039/C6TA10981K ↗
15. 10.1039/C6TA05249E10.1039/C6TA05249E ↗
16. 10.1039/C5TC00622H10.1039/C5TC00622H ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b1114410.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11144 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.08.01410.1016/j.nanoen.2015.08.014 ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20150348910.1002/adfm.201503489 ↗
20. 10.1039/C5TA09247G10.1039/C5TA09247G ↗
21. 10.3390/molecules2104047510.3390/molecules21040475 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20160590810.1002/adfm.201605908 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0022510.1021/acsnano.6b00225 ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20130465810.1002/adma.201304658 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20120048710.1002/adma.201200487 ↗
26. Lu J.‐H. · J. Vacuum Sci. Technol. A · 2014 · 32 · 02B107