Fabrication of Multicomponent Microsystems by Directed Three‐Dimensional Self‐Assembly
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We have developed a directed self‐assembly process for the fabrication of three‐dimensional (3D) microsystems that contain non‐identical parts and a statistical model that relates the process yield to the process parameters. The self‐assembly process uses geometric‐shape recognition to identify different components, and surface tension between liquid solder and metal‐coated areas to form mechanical and electrical connections. The concept is used to realize self‐packaging microsystems that contain non‐identical subunits. To enable the realization of microsystems that contain more than two non‐identical subunits, sequential self‐assembly is introduced, a process that is similar to the formation of heterodimers, heterotrimers, and higher aggregates found in nature, chemistry, and chemical biology. The self‐assembly of three‐component assemblies is demonstrated by sequentially adding device segments to the assembly solution including two hundred micrometer‐sized light‐emitting diodes (LEDs) and complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) integrated circuits. Six hundred AlGaInP/GaAs LED segments self‐assembled onto device carriers in two minutes, without defects, and encapsulation units self‐assembled onto the LED‐carrier assemblies to form a 3D circuit path to operate the final device. The self‐assembly process is a well‐defined statistical process. The process follows a first‐order, non‐linear differential equation. The presented model relates the progression of the self‐assembly and yield with the process parameters—component population and capture probability—that are defined by the agitation and the component design.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Advanced Materials and Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Cohn M. B. · Proc. SPIE—Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. · 1998 · 3512 · 2
2. R. S. Fearing presented at the Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 1995) Pittsburgh PA August 1995.
3. 10.1109/68.30016910.1109/68.300169 ↗
4. J. S.Smith H. J.Yeh US Patent 5 824 186 1998.10.1007/BF03273472 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.289.5482.117010.1126/science.289.5482.1170 ↗
6. 10.1073/pnas.03266759910.1073/pnas.032667599 ↗
7. 10.1109/84.91108710.1109/84.911087 ↗
8. 10.1109/2944.99139310.1109/2944.991393 ↗
9. K. F. Böhringer U. Srinivasan R. T. Howe presented at Int. Conf. on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS 2001) Interlaken Switzerland January 2001.
10. 10.1126/science.106915310.1126/science.1069153 ↗
11. J. Fang K. Wang K. F. Böhringer presented at Int. Conf. on Solid State Sensor Actuator and Microsystems Workshop Hilton Head Island SC June 2004.
12. 10.1063/1.180701710.1063/1.1807017 ↗
13. 10.1109/JMEMS.2003.80996410.1109/JMEMS.2003.809964 ↗
14. C. R. Barry C. J. Hoon H. O. Jacobs presented at Int. Conf. on Foundations of NanoScience: Self‐Assembled Architectures and Devices Snowbird UT April 2004.
15. 10.1073/pnas.040443710110.1073/pnas.0404437101 ↗
16. Walz M. · Circuits Assem. · 2003 · 1 · 32
17. 10.1126/science.284.5416.94810.1126/science.284.5416.948 ↗
18. K. S. Birdi Self‐assembly Monolayer Structures of Lipids and Macromolecules at Interfaces Kluwer New York1999.
19. L. Adleman Q. Cheng A. Goel M. Huang presented at ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing Hersonissos Greece July 2001.
20. 10.1109/TNANO.2003.81665810.1109/TNANO.2003.816658 ↗
21. P. J. White K. Kopanski H. Lipson presented at Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2004) New Orleans LA April 2004.