journal article·2006-12-04

High‐Resolution Characterization of Pentacene/Polyaniline Interfaces in Thin‐Film Transistors

K. S. Lee, T. J. Smith, K. C. Dickey, J. E. Yoo, K. J. Stevenson, Y.‐L. Loo

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 16· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract We present the first detailed report that directly correlates the reduced contact resistance in organic thin‐film transistors (TFTs) with fundamental structural and morphological characterization at the organic semiconductor/conducting polymer interface. Specifically, the pentacene grains are similar in size and continuous across the channel/electrode interface in bottom‐contact TFTs with polyaniline (PANI) electrodes. On a molecular level, the fused rings of pentacene are oriented perpendicular to the surface both in the channel and on PANI. Accordingly, the contact resistance is small in such devices. In TFTs with gold electrodes, however, the pentacene grains are different in size and are discontinuous across the channel/electrode interface. Further, the fused rings of pentacene are oriented perpendicular to the channel surface and parallel to the gold surface. Such differences across the channel/electrode interface lead to structural and electronic disorder, which manifests itself as a significantly larger contact resistance in devices with gold electrodes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1073/pnas.09158809810.1073/pnas.091588098 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.144865910.1063/1.1448659 ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat106110.1038/nmat1061 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.157955410.1063/1.1579554 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.136078510.1063/1.1360785 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.147608410.1063/1.1476084 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20060018810.1002/adma.200600188 ↗
8. 10.1021/ja016245910.1021/ja0162459 ↗
9. 10.1021/ol048686d10.1021/ol048686d ↗
10. 10.1021/ja042353u10.1021/ja042353u ↗
11. 10.1063/1.166699410.1063/1.1666994 ↗
12. C. R. Kagan P. Andry Thin‐Film Transistors Marcel Dekker New York2003.10.1201/9780203911778 ↗
13. S. M. Sze Physics of Semiconductor Devices Wiley New York1981.
14. 10.1016/S0038-1101(02)00204-610.1016/S0038-1101(02)00204-6 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0038-1101(02)00210-110.1016/S0038-1101(02)00210-1 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.151295010.1063/1.1512950 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.156815710.1063/1.1568157 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.35180910.1063/1.351809 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20030484110.1002/adma.200304841 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.163993710.1063/1.1639937 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.153210210.1063/1.1532102 ↗
22. 10.1002/polb.1064210.1002/polb.10642 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.290.5499.212310.1126/science.290.5499.2123 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.10522710.1063/1.105227 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.186234510.1063/1.1862345 ↗
26. M.Angelopoulos J. D.Gelorme T. H.Newman N. M.Patel D. E.Seeger US Patent 53 070 825 1994.
27. 10.1016/S0379-6779(96)03839-810.1016/S0379-6779(96)03839-8 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0379-6779(01)00509-410.1016/S0379-6779(01)00509-4 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.161336910.1063/1.1613369 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.147070210.1063/1.1470702 ↗
31. 10.1002/1521-4095(200105)13:9<631::AID-ADMA631>3.0.CO;2-F10.1002/1521-4095(200105)13:9<631::AID-ADMA631>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
32. 10.1063/1.161127810.1063/1.1611278 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.163744310.1063/1.1637443 ↗
34. While the linear mobility of the two devices atVDS = –5 V extracted from theI–Vcharacteristics are comparable the channel resistance in the device with gold electrodes appears significantly higher than that in the device with PANI–PAAMPSA electrodes. We believe this is because the SSPM measurements were carried out approximately one week after the TFTs were made and tested electrically. The SSPM output characteristics reveal a 58 % reduction in linear mobility for the TFT with gold electrodes and insignificant reduction in the device with PANI–PAAMPSA electrodes. The drastic difference in electrical characteristics of the two devices on storage is currently under investigation.
35. J. E. Yoo J. L. Cross K. S. Lee T. L. Bucholz M. P. Espe Y.‐L. Loo unpublished.
36. 10.1016/0379-6779(94)90007-810.1016/0379-6779(94)90007-8 ↗
37. Posdorfer J. R. · Proc. SPIE‐Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. · 2004 · 5214 · 188
38. 10.1016/j.cplett.2005.08.00410.1016/j.cplett.2005.08.004 ↗
39. 10.1007/s00339-003-2432-x10.1007/s00339-003-2432-x ↗
40. 10.1109/16.92522610.1109/16.925226 ↗
41. 10.1002/1521-4095(20020116)14:2<99::AID-ADMA99>3.0.CO;2-910.1002/1521-4095(20020116)14:2<99::AID-ADMA99>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
42. J. Stohr NEXAFS Spectroscopy Springer Berlin1992.10.1007/978-3-662-02853-7 ↗
43. 10.1021/la050300010.1021/la0503000 ↗
44. DeLongchamp D. M. · Proc. SPIE‐Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. · 2005 · 5940 · 54
45. 10.1021/la047634u10.1021/la047634u ↗
46. 10.1038/4435910.1038/44359 ↗
47. 10.1002/adma.20050026310.1002/adma.200500263 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.114966410.1063/1.1149664 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.26610110.1103/PhysRevLett.91.266101 ↗
50. T. J. Smith K. J. Stevenson unpublished.
51. D. A. Fischer B. M. DeKoven NSLS Newsletter1996.