Threshold Voltage Shifts in Organic Thin‐Film Transistors Due to Self‐Assembled Monolayers at the Dielectric Surface
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Recently, it has been shown by several groups that the electrical characteristics of organic thin‐film transistors (OTFTs) can be significantly influenced by depositing self‐assembled monolayers (SAMs) at the organic semiconductor/dielectric interface. In this work, the effect of such SAMs on the transfer characteristics and especially on the threshold voltage of OTFTs is investigated by means of two‐dimensional drift‐diffusion simulations. The impact of the SAM is modeled either by a permanent space charge layer that can result from chemical reactions with the active material, or by a dipole layer representing an array of ordered dipolar molecules. It is demonstrated that, in both model cases, the presence of the SAM significantly changes the transfer characteristics. In particular, it gives rise to a modified, effective gate voltage Veff that results in a rigid shift of the threshold voltage, ΔVth, relative to a SAM‐free OTFT. The achievable amount of threshold voltage shift, however, strongly depends on the actual role of the SAM. While for the investigated device dimensions, an organic SAM acting as a dipole layer can realistically shift the threshold voltage only by a few volts, the changes in the threshold voltage can be more than an order of magnitude larger when the SAM leads to charges at the interface. Based on the analysis of the different cases, a route to experimentally discriminate between SAM‐induced space charges and interface dipoles is proposed. The developed model allows for qualitative description of the behavior of organic transistors containing reactive interfacial layers; when incorporating rechargeable carrier trap states and a carrier density‐dependent mobility, even a quantitative agreement between theory and recent experiments can be achieved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.orgel.2006.07.01110.1016/j.orgel.2006.07.011 ↗
2. 10.1109/16.60547710.1109/16.605477 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.145350910.1063/1.1453509 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.152769110.1063/1.1527691 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20040005410.1002/adfm.200400054 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0379-6779(02)00958-X10.1016/S0379-6779(02)00958-X ↗
7. Jang Y. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 132104‐1
8. 10.1109/TED.2005.86063310.1109/TED.2005.860633 ↗
9. 10.1038/nature0337610.1038/nature03376 ↗
10. 10.1021/ja063290d10.1021/ja063290d ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat110510.1038/nmat1105 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.181020510.1063/1.1810205 ↗
13. Pacher P. · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 314210.1002/adma.200800058 ↗
14. 10.1021/la702409m10.1021/la702409m ↗
15. 10.1016/S0169-4332(01)00958-810.1016/S0169-4332(01)00958-8 ↗
16. 10.1021/jp057251k10.1021/jp057251k ↗
17. 10.1002/pssa.20040433510.1002/pssa.200404335 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.148625310.1063/1.1486253 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.280374210.1063/1.2803742 ↗
20. 10.1023/B:JCEL.0000011441.80136.3b10.1023/B:JCEL.0000011441.80136.3b ↗
21. 10.1063/1.158138910.1063/1.1581389 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20070029410.1002/adfm.200700294 ↗
23. Snowden C. M. · 1986
24. Considering solely the impact of an interfacial SAM on the threshold voltage of an OTFT the chosen value of the carrier mobility is of no significance.
25. 10.1063/1.147921010.1063/1.1479210 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.141537410.1063/1.1415374 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.161336910.1063/1.1613369 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.189130610.1063/1.1891306 ↗
29. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199808)10:12<923::AID-ADMA923>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199808)10:12<923::AID-ADMA923>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.R1432110.1103/PhysRevB.54.R14321 ↗
31. It should be noted that in these simulations no assumptions regarding the mechanism of the threshold voltage shift induced by the dipolar layer are made. They are solely based on the equations discussed in Section 2.
32. Deviations from this ideality in real devices as well as the mutual depolarisation of adjacent dipolar molecules i.e the fact that tightly packed molecules have a smaller dipole moment than isolated ones render the obtained values forMdiponly lower limits to the actually necessary ones.
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.04511310.1103/PhysRevB.77.045113 ↗
34. 10.1002/adfm.20060111610.1002/adfm.200601116 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.12038110.1063/1.120381 ↗
36. 10.1021/la981114f10.1021/la981114f ↗
37. 10.1063/1.149744010.1063/1.1497440 ↗
38. 10.1021/ja012316s10.1021/ja012316s ↗
39. Lowering the coverage and thus increasing the molecular footprint would require even largerMdip.
40. Even if molecules with dipole moments as large as 50 D could be synthesized they would certainly not align in a parallel fashion necessary to form a dipolar layer.
41. 10.1016/S0379-6779(97)80881-810.1016/S0379-6779(97)80881-8 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.20660110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.206601 ↗
43. 10.1016/S1566-1199(03)00016-810.1016/S1566-1199(03)00016-8 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.155899810.1063/1.1558998 ↗
45. 10.1063/1.233634510.1063/1.2336345 ↗
46. 10.1109/T-ED.1969.1656610.1109/T-ED.1969.16566 ↗
47. Böer K. W. · 2002
48. 10.1016/S1566-1199(01)00017-910.1016/S1566-1199(01)00017-9 ↗