journal article·2025-03Open access

Sustainable and Tunable Synaptic Electrolyte‐Gated Organic Field‐Effect Transistors (EGOFETs) for Light Adaptive Visual Perceptive Systems

Theodoros Serghiou, José Diego Fernandes, Vaithinathan Karthikeyan, Dani S. Assi, Douglas Henrique Vieira, Neri Alves, Jeff Kettle

Advanced Functional Materials· Volume 35· Issue 11

Abstract

Abstract The recent advances in optic neuromorphic devices have led to a subsequent rise in the development of energy‐efficient artificial‐vision systems. While the energy consumption of such devices is known to be much lower than conventional vision systems, it is known that manufacturing accounts for the largest share of the climate impact in microelectronics, dominating over the product use phase. Thus, there is a need to develop sustainable manufacturing processes and to adopt low‐impact materials for hardware solutions of the future. In this study, an Electrolyte‐Gated Organic Field‐effect Transistor (EGOFET) is experimentally demonstrated for the implementation of a high‐performing synaptic optical sensor using sustainable materials that degrade to benign products at the End of Life (EoL). The device shows remarkable light response with maximum Paired‐Pulse Facilitation (PPF) Index of up to 151% at a light power density of 38 µW cm−2, which enables artificial synaptic applications with an average power consumption as low as 2.4 pJ for each training process, representing one of the best among the reported results. To demonstrate the tunability of the vision system, an ensemble decision tree is used to enable the EGOFET to distinguish and remember different primary colors at different power densities with 95.6% accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Photoreceptor and optogenetics research · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

James Watt School of Engineering University of Glasgow Glasgow Scotland G12 8QQ UK

Department of Physics, School of Technology and Applied Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP) Presidente Prudente SP 19060‐900 Brazil

School of Science and Technology Hong Kong Metropolitan University Ho Man Tin Hong Kong 11/F China

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (93)

Show source-provided references
1. Sun C. · Technol. Adv. Mater. · 2023 · 24
2. 10.1038/s41427-019-0182-210.1038/s41427-019-0182-2 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0324010.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03240 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20080243010.1002/adma.200802430 ↗
5. 10.1088/2053-1583/aa805e10.1088/2053-1583/aa805e ↗
6. 10.1038/s41565-019-0501-310.1038/s41565-019-0501-3 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467-020-19806-610.1038/s41467-020-19806-6 ↗
8. 10.1145/216585.21658810.1145/216585.216588 ↗
9. 10.1002/advs.20230079110.1002/advs.202300791 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.sse.2020.10776710.1016/j.sse.2020.107767 ↗
11. 10.1039/C8NR07133K10.1039/C8NR07133K ↗
12. 10.1088/1361-6528/ab554b10.1088/1361-6528/ab554b ↗
13. 10.1039/D0NR08082A10.1039/D0NR08082A ↗
14. 10.1109/TBCAS.2015.241442310.1109/TBCAS.2015.2414423 ↗
15. 10.1186/s11671-017-2114-910.1186/s11671-017-2114-9 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41598-022-08703-110.1038/s41598-022-08703-1 ↗
17. 10.1109/JSTQE.2023.324024810.1109/JSTQE.2023.3240248 ↗
18. Muller‐Cleve S. F. · Neurosci. · 2022 · 16
19. E.Skjervold O. T.Hoelsreter IEEE MILCOM 2018 1.10.1109/MILCOM.2018.8599684 ↗
20. Wang W. S. · Technol. Adv. Mater. · 2023 · 24
21. Wang W. · Sci. Adv. · 2018 · 4
22. 10.1016/j.neucom.2010.07.02310.1016/j.neucom.2010.07.023 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467-023-43944-210.1038/s41467-023-43944-2 ↗
24. 10.1038/nature1444110.1038/nature14441 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20150367410.1002/adma.201503674 ↗
26. Wang H. · Adv. Mater. · 2017 · 29
27. Wang Y. · Adv. Mater. · 2018 · 30
28. 10.1002/adom.20140047210.1002/adom.201400472 ↗
29. Lee M. · Adv. Mater. · 2017 · 29
30. 10.1021/acsami.9b0208610.1021/acsami.9b02086 ↗
31. He H. · Small · 2018 · 14
32. Ham S. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2019 · 29
33. Park H. · Adv. Mater. · 2020 · 32
34. 10.1038/s41467-018-07572-510.1038/s41467-018-07572-5 ↗
35. 10.1038/nmat485610.1038/nmat4856 ↗
36. Park H. · Adv. Mater. · 2020 · 32
37. 10.1126/sciadv.170132910.1126/sciadv.1701329 ↗
38. 10.1126/sciadv.abf195910.1126/sciadv.abf1959 ↗
39. 10.1002/adma.20210318310.1002/adma.202103183 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.02.03510.1016/j.msec.2015.02.035 ↗
41. 10.1038/s41598-022-10251-710.1038/s41598-022-10251-7 ↗
42. Guo Z. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2023 · 33
43. 10.1016/j.orgel.2022.10662210.1016/j.orgel.2022.106622 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.06.00610.1016/j.orgel.2019.06.006 ↗
45. Wu L. · Adv. Electron. Mater. · 2021 · 7
46. Chen J. · Adv. Mater. · 2022 · 34
47. Li D. · Adv. Sci. · 2022 · 9
48. Liu X. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2022 · 32
49. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.06.00710.1016/j.nanoen.2019.06.007 ↗
50. Han C. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2022 · 32
51. Yang C. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2020 · 30
52. 10.1038/ncomms415810.1038/ncomms4158 ↗
53. Wang S. · Adv. Mater. · 2019 · 31
54. 10.3390/electronics1207159610.3390/electronics12071596 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.10700110.1016/j.nanoen.2022.107001 ↗
56. Shi J. · Adv. Mater. · 2022 · 34
57. 10.1002/aisy.20220016410.1002/aisy.202200164 ↗
58. 10.1038/s41377-023-01310-310.1038/s41377-023-01310-3 ↗
59. 10.3390/molecules2415273810.3390/molecules24152738 ↗
60. 10.1007/s40843-020-1534-210.1007/s40843-020-1534-2 ↗
61. 10.1002/pssr.20230019110.1002/pssr.202300191 ↗
62. 10.1007/s40820-021-00784-310.1007/s40820-021-00784-3 ↗
63. 10.1038/s41598-022-07505-910.1038/s41598-022-07505-9 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.10631510.1016/j.isci.2023.106315 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.01.00510.1016/j.joule.2021.01.005 ↗
66. 10.1088/1361-6528/abaa0e10.1088/1361-6528/abaa0e ↗
67. 10.7567/1882-0786/aafc7410.7567/1882-0786/aafc74 ↗
68. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0047410.1021/acsaelm.0c00474 ↗
69. Huang H. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2019 · 29
70. 10.1038/s41598-019-55310-810.1038/s41598-019-55310-8 ↗
71. 10.1021/acsaelm.2c0039510.1021/acsaelm.2c00395 ↗
72. He Y. · Adv. Mater. · 2019 · 31
73. 10.1002/adma.20150589810.1002/adma.201505898 ↗
74. 10.1021/acsami.5b1272610.1021/acsami.5b12726 ↗
75. 10.1039/C9TC05765J10.1039/C9TC05765J ↗
76. Wan C. J. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 108
77. 10.1038/s41563-018-0248-510.1038/s41563-018-0248-5 ↗
78. Yang J. · Adv. Mater. · 2018 · 30
79. 10.1021/acsami.6b1374610.1021/acsami.6b13746 ↗
80. Jiang J. · Small · 2017 · 13
81. Yang C. S. · Adv. Mater. · 2017 · 29
82. 10.1002/adma.20150271910.1002/adma.201502719 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.10426810.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104268 ↗
84. J.Tang D.Bishop S.Kim M.Copel T.Gokmen T.Todorov S.Shin K.‐T.Lee P.Solomon K.Chan W.Haensch J.Rozen IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2018.
85. 10.1021/acsami.8b1506310.1021/acsami.8b15063 ↗
86. Xu W. · Sci. Adv. · 2016 · 2
87. 10.1002/adma.20120311610.1002/adma.201203116 ↗
88. 10.1088/1674-4926/42/1/01310310.1088/1674-4926/42/1/013103 ↗
89. Sharbati M. T. · Adv. Mater. · 2018 · 30
90. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10534210.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105342 ↗
91. B. H.Menze B. M.Kelm D. N.Splitthoff U.Koethe F. A.Hamprecht European Conference (ECML PKDD) 2011 453.10.1007/978-3-642-23783-6_29 ↗
92. 10.1016/j.solmat.2021.11155010.1016/j.solmat.2021.111550 ↗
93. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.09.05110.1016/j.foodchem.2015.09.051 ↗