In2S3‐Gated Organic Photoelectrochemical Transistor with a Stable Transconductance
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Transconductance (gm) is one important figure of merit for benchmarking organic electrochemical transistor (OECT) biosensors, which nevertheless experiences undesired fluctuation instead of keep constant during the target detection of varied concentrations. Light‐matter interplay is recently shown as a potential way to regulate the OECT characteristics, e.g. maximum gm at zero gate bias is achieved. In this work, the challenge of unstable gm is addressed by using a unique metal‐organic framework (MOF)‐derived hollow tube indium sulfide (m‐In2S3) as the photogate. Interestingly, the light irradiation on m‐In2S3 generate a straight transfer curve, leading to a stable gm that is desirable for biological application. Exemplifying by an aptasening, such a device is then tested for protein quantification with a stable sensitivity during the detection. This work features the feasibility of light‐matter interplay to achieve a stable gm in organic electronics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Conducting polymers and applications · Perovskite Materials and Applications · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Nanjing University Nanjing 210023 China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.8610.1038/natrevmats.2017.86 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41467-018-06084-610.1038/s41467-018-06084-6 ↗
3. 10.1002/adfm.20201086810.1002/adfm.202010868 ↗
4. 10.1038/ncomms313310.1038/ncomms3133 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41467-020-16648-010.1038/s41467-020-16648-0 ↗
6. 10.1002/adfm.20231282210.1002/adfm.202312822 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20130308010.1002/adma.201303080 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20180554410.1002/adma.201805544 ↗
9. 10.1002/inf2.1247810.1002/inf2.12478 ↗
10. Liu H. · Adv. Sci. · 2023
11. 10.1038/s41467-023-37402-210.1038/s41467-023-37402-2 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20110333410.1002/adma.201103334 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20210904610.1002/adfm.202109046 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c0579710.1021/acs.analchem.2c05797 ↗
15. 10.1007/s40843-022-2295-810.1007/s40843-022-2295-8 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-023-41313-710.1038/s41467-023-41313-7 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41467-023-41083-210.1038/s41467-023-41083-2 ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20221127710.1002/adfm.202211277 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11426-022-1425-910.1007/s11426-022-1425-9 ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20230058010.1002/adfm.202300580 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20170244810.1002/adfm.201702448 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c0140110.1021/acs.analchem.3c01401 ↗
23. 10.1007/s12274-016-1254-z10.1007/s12274-016-1254-z ↗
24. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.03310.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.033 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13171110.1016/j.cej.2021.131711 ↗
26. 10.1039/D2TA00083K10.1039/D2TA00083K ↗
27. 10.1002/advs.20210506310.1002/advs.202105063 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11788210.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117882 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.12251710.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122517 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jmat.2021.01.00210.1016/j.jmat.2021.01.002 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0073110.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00731 ↗
32. 10.1021/jacs.8b0220010.1021/jacs.8b02200 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.13910.1016/j.cej.2018.01.139 ↗
34. 10.1039/C8CC03219J10.1039/C8CC03219J ↗
35. 10.1002/adma.20110201710.1002/adma.201102017 ↗
36. 10.1002/adfm.20200493910.1002/adfm.202004939 ↗
37. 10.1002/adma.20160212510.1002/adma.201602125 ↗
38. 10.1002/adma.20190229110.1002/adma.201902291 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsami.1c1300910.1021/acsami.1c13009 ↗
40. 10.1002/adfm.20060123910.1002/adfm.200601239 ↗
41. 10.1002/anie.20231787610.1002/anie.202317876 ↗
42. 10.1039/B713122D10.1039/B713122D ↗
43. 10.1016/j.bios.2024.11607510.1016/j.bios.2024.116075 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.snb.2023.13457410.1016/j.snb.2023.134574 ↗