Use in Photoredox Catalysis of Stable Donor–Acceptor Covalent Organic Frameworks and Membrane Strategy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Optoelectronic attributes notwithstanding donor–acceptor covalent organic frameworks (D–A COFs) are not durable photocatalysts in many cases. Herein, a stabilization strategy of D–A COFs by intramolecular hydrogen (H)‐bonds and a membrane‐based mass transfer strategy for photocatalytic modulation are reported. The crystalline stability design of COF is cored at the strong π–π interactions and the H‐bonds of adjacent tetrakis(4‐formylphenyl)pyrene and naphthalenediimide units and the D–A charge transfer is designed for efficiency optimization. The well‐defined, stable structure and charge dynamics of D–A COF, and the structure‐controlled reactive oxygen species yields are confirmed. In two photoredox models, the COF presents both robust activity and stability and is further integrated with the mass transfer optimization of the COFs/polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. The membrane is recycled at least 15 times, and the turnover frequency value of g‐scale amine coupling is as high as 62.4 h−1. This work offers a facile approach to the stabilization design of D–A COFs and explores a general membrane‐based mass transfer strategy for photocatalysis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Covalent Organic Framework Applications · Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Structural Chemistry Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter Chinese Academy of Sciences Fuzhou 350002 P. R. China
University of Chinese Academy of Science Beijing 100049 P. R. China
Fujian Science & Technology Innovation Laboratory for Optoelectronic Information of China Fuzhou 350108 P. R. China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/ncomms1232510.1038/ncomms12325 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.08.02410.1016/j.chempr.2020.08.024 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.aat767910.1126/science.aat7679 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0423710.1021/acs.chemmater.0c04237 ↗
5. 10.1039/D0CS01027H10.1039/D0CS01027H ↗
6. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0124210.1021/acscatal.0c01242 ↗
7. 10.1039/D2CY00167E10.1039/D2CY00167E ↗
8. 10.1021/jacs.5b0355310.1021/jacs.5b03553 ↗
9. 10.1021/jacs.6b1200510.1021/jacs.6b12005 ↗
10. 10.1002/anie.20130677510.1002/anie.201306775 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c0328010.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03280 ↗
12. 10.1039/C5SC00512D10.1039/C5SC00512D ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.0c1578910.1021/acsami.0c15789 ↗
14. 10.1002/chem.20120375310.1002/chem.201203753 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.05.02610.1016/j.chempr.2020.05.026 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.1c0895110.1021/acsami.1c08951 ↗
17. 10.1002/anie.20201440810.1002/anie.202014408 ↗
18. 10.1002/jcc.2049510.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.0c1611610.1021/acsami.0c16116 ↗
20. 10.1021/jacs.0c0720610.1021/jacs.0c07206 ↗
21. 10.1002/anie.20120951310.1002/anie.201209513 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20160141310.1002/adma.201601413 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.05.00110.1016/j.mattod.2018.05.001 ↗
24. 10.1039/c2gc35148j10.1039/c2gc35148j ↗
25. 10.1002/anie.20160214210.1002/anie.201602142 ↗
26. 10.1007/s11426-021-1088-210.1007/s11426-021-1088-2 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2022.10122510.1016/j.mtchem.2022.101225 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.0c0001310.1021/acsami.0c00013 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.12.06510.1016/j.apcatb.2018.12.065 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cej.2022.13578710.1016/j.cej.2022.135787 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12580010.1016/j.cej.2020.125800 ↗