journal article·2023-12-06Open access

Shape-Controlled Synthesis of Cu3TeO6 Nanoparticles with Photocatalytic Features

Javier Fernández-Catalá, Laura Jussila, Matyas Daboczi, Filipp Temerov, Salvador Eslava, Rossella Greco, Wei Cao

Crystal Growth & Design· Volume 23· Issue 12

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Cu 3 TeO 6 (CTO) has been synthesized by hydrothermal synthesis applying different pH values without any template or a calcination step to control the crystalline phase and the morphology of nanoparticles. The physicochemical properties characterized by X-ray diffraction, field emission scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, N 2 adsorption, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and diffuse reflectance ultraviolet–visible (DRUV–vis) spectroscopy techniques revealed that the pH values significantly influence the crystal growth. In acidic media (pH = 2), crystal growth has not been achieved. At pH = 4, the yield is low (10%), and the CTO presents irregular morphology. At pH = 6, the yield increases (up to 71%) obtaining an agglomeration of nanoparticles into spherical morphology. At basic conditions (pH = 8), the yield increases up to 90% and the morphology is the same as the sample obtained at pH = 6. At high basic conditions (pH = 10), the yield is similar (92%), although the morphology changes totally to dispersed nanoparticles. Importantly, the as-prepared CTO semiconductor presents photocatalytic activity for H 2 production using triethanolamine as a sacrificial agent under visible light illumination. The results also revealed that the nanoparticles agglomerated in a spherical morphology with larger surface area presented almost double activities in H 2 production compared to heterogeneously sized particles. These results highlight the suitable optoelectronic properties, including optical band gap, energy levels, and photoconductivity of CTO semiconductors for their use in photocatalytic H 2 production.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nano and Molecular Systems Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu FIN-90014, Finland

Materials Institute and Inorganic Chemistry Department, University of Alicante, Ap. 99, Alicante E-03080, Spain

Department of Chemical Engineering and Centre for Processable Electronics, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, U.K.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · European Research Council · European Commission · Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovaci?n

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/anie.20100137410.1002/anie.201001374 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20110275210.1002/adma.201102752 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cplett.2022.13955510.1016/j.cplett.2022.139555 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsanm.3c0063010.1021/acsanm.3c00630 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.08.00810.1016/j.matlet.2016.08.008 ↗
6. 10.1038/ncomms420110.1038/ncomms4201 ↗
7. 10.1140/epjb/e2013-40152-x10.1140/epjb/e2013-40152-x ↗
8. 10.1002/er.822110.1002/er.8221 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.10537810.1016/j.microc.2020.105378 ↗
10. 10.1002/pssa.20230000210.1002/pssa.202300002 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.mssp.2019.10475810.1016/j.mssp.2019.104758 ↗
12. Hostachy A. · C. R. Acad. Sci. · 1968 · 267 · 1435
13. Falck B. Y. L. · Acta Crystallogr. · 1978 · 18 · 89610.1107/S0567740878004276 ↗
14. 10.1111/jace.1435710.1111/jace.14357 ↗
15. 10.1039/c3dt50785h10.1039/c3dt50785h ↗
16. 10.1007/s40820-019-0317-610.1007/s40820-019-0317-6 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12369110.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123691 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.04610.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.046 ↗
19. 10.1021/ic050283210.1021/ic0502832 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0134510.1021/acsaem.8b01345 ↗
21. 10.1039/C8CS00542G10.1039/C8CS00542G ↗
22. 10.1038/238037a010.1038/238037a0 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41586-021-03907-310.1038/s41586-021-03907-3 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsestengg.1c0034610.1021/acsestengg.1c00346 ↗
25. 10.1080/10643389.2023.223912510.1080/10643389.2023.2239125 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.mssp.2023.10744410.1016/j.mssp.2023.107444 ↗
27. 10.1021/cr500189210.1021/cr5001892 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41699-023-00412-110.1038/s41699-023-00412-1 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp000499j10.1021/jp000499j ↗
30. 10.1039/D0RA09666K10.1039/D0RA09666K ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.11946110.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119461 ↗
32. 10.1007/s10800-009-9996-x10.1007/s10800-009-9996-x ↗
33. 10.1016/0022-0248(77)90050-110.1016/0022-0248(77)90050-1 ↗
34. 10.1002/aic.1066410.1002/aic.10664 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.11.00910.1016/j.jmmm.2013.11.009 ↗
36. 10.1107/S205252062101303210.1107/S2052520621013032 ↗
37. 10.1039/c2ce25337b10.1039/c2ce25337b ↗
38. 10.1016/j.molcata.2009.01.01910.1016/j.molcata.2009.01.019 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.08.07110.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.08.071 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.05.01310.1016/j.jiec.2016.05.013 ↗
41. 10.1515/pac-2014-111710.1515/pac-2014-1117 ↗
42. Sotomayor F. · Acc. Mater. Surf. Res. · 2018 · 3 · 34
43. 10.1021/la00077a01710.1021/la00077a017 ↗
44. 10.3390/molecules2212224310.3390/molecules22122243 ↗
45. 10.1116/1.124788310.1116/1.1247883 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.20210.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.202 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.21443710.1103/PhysRevB.106.214437 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0289210.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02892 ↗
49. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0266210.1021/acscatal.7b02662 ↗
50. 10.3390/nano909125710.3390/nano9091257 ↗
51. 10.1007/s40145-012-0022-010.1007/s40145-012-0022-0 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.19910.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.199 ↗
53. 10.1039/D2RA03707F10.1039/D2RA03707F ↗
54. 10.1002/adfm.20050050410.1002/adfm.200500504 ↗
55. 10.1021/jp075272410.1021/jp0752724 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.apcata.2018.07.02410.1016/j.apcata.2018.07.024 ↗