Field Risk Evaluation of Liquid Metal Interconnects in Microelectronics Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Gallium is one of the most desirable, yet less known, interconnects considered in the semiconductor industry. Good electrical conductivity and high stretchability of the liquid metal makes it very attractive for many applications. It allows components to be assembled or disaggregated like Lego blocks without any external forces or energy. The focus of this article is to shed light on intrinsic reliability degradation mechanisms for components that use liquid metal interconnects. As a starting reference to field reliability risk evaluations, the authors focus on common/controlled use conditions. Environments studied include standard test evaluation procedures like thermal aging (sustained exposure to high temperature over time), thermal cycling, current carrying capability, and finally functional product life cycle testing. Studies reveal that the interconnect has very distinct failure mechanisms and unique advantageous/disadvantageous over existing interconnects. Fundamental knowledge gained in this study is expected to help 1) drive future architectures, 2) material/design changes to address any limitations, and 3) finally new qualification methods/standards that account for the unique failure mechanisms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Semiconductor materials and devices · 3D IC and TSV technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Assembly Test & Technology Development Intel Corporation Hillsboro Oregon 97124 USA
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Heterogenous Integration Roadmap https://eps.ieee.org/images/files/HIR_2021/ch22_2D-3D.pdf(accessed: 2023).
2. K.Meyyappan A.Kurella B.Pathangey A.McAllister A.Abraham G.Murtagian in2014 IEEE 60th Holm Conf. on Electrical Contacts (Holm) New Orleans LA 12–15 October 2014 pp.1–9.10.1109/HOLM.2014.7031070 ↗
3. K.Meyyappan A.McAllister A.Abraham V.Krithivasan G.Murtagian in2014 IEEE 60th Holm Conf. on Electrical Contacts (Holm) New Orleans LA 12–15 October 2014 pp.1–7.10.1109/HOLM.2014.7031071 ↗
4. Clemm C. · 2019
5. K.Meyyappan T.Pooya G.Murtagian S.Nekkanty V.Ouvarov-Bancalero Z.Lin X.Lu inIEEE Transactions on Components Packaging and Manufacturing Technology May 2023 https://doi.org/10.1109/TCPMT.2023.3274743.10.1109/TCPMT.2023.3274743 ↗
6. Slade P. G. · 1991
7. 10.1007/s11431-022-2074-810.1007/s11431-022-2074-8 ↗
8. Bo G. · Adv. Phys. · 2018 · 3 · 1446359
9. 10.1109/JMEMS.2015.245534010.1109/JMEMS.2015.2455340 ↗
10. A.Ndieguene P.Albert C.Fortin V.Oberson J.Sylvestre in2016 IEEE 66th Electronic Components and Technology Conf. (ECTC) Las Vegas NV May–June 2016 pp.580–587 https://www.doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.2016.29.10.1109/ECTC.2016.29 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.01210.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.012 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.120877410.1126/science.1208774 ↗
13. 10.3390/ma1108138410.3390/ma11081384 ↗
14. 10.1039/C7CS00043J10.1039/C7CS00043J ↗
15. 10.1007/s11661-021-06256-y10.1007/s11661-021-06256-y ↗
16. 10.1007/s11669-010-9785-610.1007/s11669-010-9785-6 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11664-019-07356-710.1007/s11664-019-07356-7 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10765-018-2440-x10.1007/s10765-018-2440-x ↗
19. 10.1007/s00339-009-5098-110.1007/s00339-009-5098-1 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.corsci.2020.10852410.1016/j.corsci.2020.108524 ↗
21. 10.1109/TDMR.2014.233375810.1109/TDMR.2014.2333758 ↗
22. G. J. S.Chou inProc. of IEEE Holm Conf. on Electrical Contacts 23–26 September 2012 Portland OR USA pp.1–5.10.1109/HOLM.2012.6336595 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.11.00510.1016/j.jmapro.2022.11.005 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.505938010.1063/1.5059380 ↗
25. C.Gu R. F.Kwasnick N. R.Mielke E. M.Monroe C. G.Shirley inIEEE Int. Reliability Physics Symp. Proc. San Jose CA March 2006 pp.299–306 https://www.doi.org/10.1109/RELPHY.2006.251232.10.1109/RELPHY.2006.251232 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matt.2022.05.03110.1016/j.matt.2022.05.031 ↗
27. M.Ronay T.Rivera M.Hopkins C.Kinzel S.Bright A.Behr T.Abe T.Fukao T.Sawada K.Michigami inIEEE Int. Flexible Electronics Technology Conf. Vancouver BC Canada 11–14 August 2019.
28. 10.1002/adfm.20140304210.1002/adfm.201403042 ↗
29. IPC-SM-785 inGuidelines for Accelerated Reliability Testing of Surface Mount Solder Attachments November1992.
30. JEDEC JESD 47 inStress-Test-Driven Qualification of Integrated Circuits December2022.
31. JEDEC JEP 122 inFailure Mechanisms and Models for Semiconductor Devices September2016.
32. JEDEC JESD 94 inApplicationSpecific Qualification Using Knowledge Based Test Methodology October2015.
33. 2021
34. Thermal Mechanical Specifications and Design guide https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/guides/xeon-scalable-thermal-guide.pdf(accessed: December 2019).
35. Scalable Generation Intel Xeon Scalable Processors https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/2nd-gen-xeon-scalable-datasheet-vol-1.pdf(accessed: April 2019).