journal article·2026-07-08Open access

Model‐Based Bayesian Optimization for Organic Photovoltaics: Combining Bayesian Optimization With Physical Domain Knowledge

Leonard Christen, Thomas Kirchartz

Abstract

ABSTRACT Efficient process optimization is of crucial importance in materials science and industrial manufacturing. Bayesian optimization has proven to be an effective method for optimizing time‐consuming experiments; however, it is typically carried out as a black‐box approach without utilizing prior physical knowledge. In this work, we apply a model‐based Bayesian optimization approach in which a physical model of the solar cell is integrated into the optimization process. Simultaneous exploration and exploitation of the parameter space is enabled by the acquisition function, as is customary for Bayesian Optimization. We show that the so‐called Knowledge Gradient fits particularly well for the model‐based approach. The method was validated both experimentally, using the PTQ10:BTP‐eC9 material system, and statistically, using a benchmark function specifically developed for organic photovoltaics. The results show that the model‐based approach is superior to the conventional black‐box approach and that the global optimum can be identified more reliably. This work demonstrates the potential of integrating domain knowledge into Bayesian optimization algorithms and opens up new perspectives for accelerated process optimization in photovoltaic research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

IMD3‐Photovoltaik Forschungszentrum Jülich Jülich Germany

Faculty of Engineering and CENIDE University of Duisburg‐Essen Duisburg Germany

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/cjoc.7042510.1002/cjoc.70425 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.solener.2025.11337810.1016/j.solener.2025.113378 ↗
3. 10.3390/ai609022510.3390/ai6090225 ↗
4. A Review of Machine Learning in Organic Solar Cells10.3390/pr13020393 ↗
5. 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.329854210.1109/ACCESS.2023.3298542 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00170‐019‐03988‐510.1007/s00170‐019‐03988‐5 ↗
7. Machine Learning for Ultra High Throughput Screening of Organic Solar Cells: Solving the Needle in the Haystack Problem10.1002/aenm.202303000 ↗
8. P. I.Frazier “A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimization arXiv:180702811” (2018) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1807.02811.
9. 10.1039/D5EE06488K10.1039/D5EE06488K ↗
10. 10.71222/yx8vev1510.71222/yx8vev15 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c0095510.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00955 ↗
12. Progress in Research on Organic Photovoltaic Acceptor Materials10.1039/D4RA08370A ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20250406310.1002/adma.202504063 ↗
14. 10.1063/5.013945710.1063/5.0139457 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20180045310.1002/adma.201800453 ↗
16. Achieving a Record Fill Factor of Approaching 84% and 21% Efficiency in Binary Organic Solar Cells via Solid Additive Engineering10.1002/adma.202519230 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.mser.2025.10111810.1016/j.mser.2025.101118 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20250028210.1002/adma.202500282 ↗
19. 10.1039/C4CS00227J10.1039/C4CS00227J ↗
20. Insight into Organic Photovoltaic Cell: Prospect and Challenges10.1016/j.uncres.2024.100121 ↗
21. 10.1039/D5EE01504A10.1039/D5EE01504A ↗
22. Advances in Organic Photovoltaic Cells: a Comprehensive Review of Materials, Technologies, and Performance10.1039/D3RA01454A ↗
23. 10.1002/aenm.20250134010.1002/aenm.202501340 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0472610.1021/acsnano.8b04726 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.accounts.0c0071310.1021/acs.accounts.0c00713 ↗
26. 10.1002/cite.20180008610.1002/cite.201800086 ↗
27. R.AstudilloandP.Frazier “Bayesian Optimization of Composite Functions ” inInternational Conference on Machine Learning(PMLR 2019) 354.
28. 10.1038/s42254‐021‐00314‐510.1038/s42254‐021‐00314‐5 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41524‐023‐01173‐710.1038/s41524‐023‐01173‐7 ↗
30. “Best Research‐Cell Efficiency Chart National Laboratory of the Rockies” (2026):https://www.nlr.gov/pv/cell‐efficiency.
31. 10.1038/s41578‐025‐00792‐410.1038/s41578‐025‐00792‐4 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.joule.2024.06.00610.1016/j.joule.2024.06.006 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.03.01410.1016/j.joule.2021.03.014 ↗
34. 10.1038/srep2486110.1038/srep24861 ↗
35. Schropp R. E. I. · 1998 · 117
36. 10.1002/aenm.20240588910.1002/aenm.202405889 ↗
37. 10.1088/1361‐6633/adb20c10.1088/1361‐6633/adb20c ↗
38. Garnett R. · 202310.1017/9781108348973 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41598‐025‐18632‐410.1038/s41598‐025‐18632‐4 ↗
40. 10.1002/adts.20230101310.1002/adts.202301013 ↗
41. 10.1186/s11671‐023‐03821‐910.1186/s11671‐023‐03821‐9 ↗
42. 10.1039/D3EE02027D10.1039/D3EE02027D ↗
43. 10.1016/j.solmat.2022.11205510.1016/j.solmat.2022.112055 ↗
44. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c0263510.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02635 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.03.00310.1016/j.joule.2022.03.003 ↗
46. 10.1038/s41598‐020‐60652‐910.1038/s41598‐020‐60652‐9 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41524‐018‐0106‐710.1038/s41524‐018‐0106‐7 ↗
48. 10.1137/07069342410.1137/070693424 ↗
49. R.AstudilloandP. I.Frazier “Thinking inside the box: A tutorial on grey‐box Bayesian optimization in WSC '21: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference” 2(2021):1–15 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.00272.
50. Entropy Search for Information‐efficient Global Optimization
51. J.RenandD.Sweet “Optimal Initialization of Batch Bayesian Optimization arXiv: 240417997v1” (2024) https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.17997.
52. BoTorch: a Framework for Efficient Monte‐Carlo Bayesian Optimization
53. Morphologically Engineered Multi‐component Organic Solar Cells with Stratified Donor Distribution and Alloyed Acceptors for Enhanced Efficiency and Stability10.1016/j.mtener.2024.101548 ↗
54. 10.1504/IJMMNO.2013.05520410.1504/IJMMNO.2013.055204 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.swevo.2015.07.00310.1016/j.swevo.2015.07.003 ↗
56. Common Benchmark Functions for Metaheuristic Evaluation: a Review10.30630/joiv.1.4-2.65 ↗
57. 10.1002/aenm.20250024710.1002/aenm.202500247 ↗
58. Das B. · 2022
59. Hartnagel P. · 2023
60. Organic Photovoltaics: Relating Chemical Structure, Local Morphology, and Electronic Properties10.1016/j.trechm.2020.03.006 ↗
61. 10.1146/annurev‐physchem‐040215‐11214410.1146/annurev‐physchem‐040215‐112144 ↗
62. 10.1021/ar900119f10.1021/ar900119f ↗
63. 10.1002/aenm.20140031110.1002/aenm.201400311 ↗
64. 10.1002/aenm.20150133510.1002/aenm.201501335 ↗
65. K.Qin L. J.Hong andW.Fan “Non‐myopic Knowledge Gradient Policy for Ranking and Selection ” in2022 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC)(IEEE 2022) 3051 https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC57314.2022.10015275.10.1109/WSC57314.2022.10015275 ↗
66. X.YueandR. A. L.Kontar “Why Non‐myopic Bayesian Optimization Is Promising and How Far Should We Look‐ahead? A Study via Rollout ” inInternational Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics(PMLR 2020) 2808.