journal article·2025-01-13

A Generative Adversarial Network Approach to Predict Nanoparticle Size in Microfluidics

Sara Mihandoost, Sima Rezvantalab, Roger M Pallares, Volkmar Schulz, Fabian Kiessling

Publisher page

Abstract

To achieve precise control over the properties and performance of nanoparticles (NPs) in a microfluidic setting, a profound understanding of the influential parameters governing the NP size is crucial. This study specifically delves into poly(lactic- co -glycolic acid) (PLGA)-based NPs synthesized through microfluidics that have been extensively explored as drug delivery systems (DDS). A comprehensive database, containing more than 11 hundred data points, is curated through an extensive literature review, identifying potential effective features. Initially, we employed a tabular generative adversarial network (TGAN) to enhance data sets, increasing the reliability of the obtained results and elevating prediction accuracy. Subsequently, NP size prediction was performed using different machine learning (ML) techniques including decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), deep neural networks (DNN), linear regression (LR), support vector regression (SVR), and gradient boosting (GB). Among these ensembles, DT emerges as the most accurate algorithm, yielding an average prediction error of 8%. Further simulations underscore the pivotal role of the synthesis method, poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) concentration, and lactide-to-glycolide (LA/GA) ratio of PLGA copolymers as the primary determinants influencing NP size.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications · Machine Learning and Data Classification · Biosensors and Analytical Detection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Electrical Engineering Department, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia 57166-419, Iran

Chemical Engineering Department, Urmia University of Technology, Urmia 57166-419, Iran

Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, 52074 Aachen, Germany

Institute of Imaging and Computer Vision, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany

Department of Physics of Molecular Imaging Systems, Institute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany

Fraunhofer Institute for Digital Medicine MEVIS, 28359 Bremen, Germany

References (79)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.talanta.2018.02.02810.1016/j.talanta.2018.02.028 ↗
2. 10.1002/cssc.20140001210.1002/cssc.201400012 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b0500710.1021/acs.analchem.8b05007 ↗
4. 10.3390/bios1207054310.3390/bios12070543 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c0041110.1021/acs.accounts.1c00411 ↗
6. 10.1038/nbt.298910.1038/nbt.2989 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.03.01010.1016/j.jconrel.2020.03.010 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.coche.2014.12.00110.1016/j.coche.2014.12.001 ↗
9. 10.1080/17460441.2020.175866310.1080/17460441.2020.1758663 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.473858610.1063/1.4738586 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.02210.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.022 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.3c1762110.1021/acsami.3c17621 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.nano.2013.08.00310.1016/j.nano.2013.08.003 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-022-34750-310.1038/s41467-022-34750-3 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20140540810.1002/adma.201405408 ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20190926010.1002/adfm.201909260 ↗
17. 10.1021/acscentsci.9b0113910.1021/acscentsci.9b01139 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0049710.1021/acsnano.7b00497 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.12.02810.1016/j.jconrel.2022.12.028 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0098710.1021/acsanm.1c00987 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c0098510.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00985 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41524-021-00520-w10.1038/s41524-021-00520-w ↗
23. 10.1039/D0LC00153H10.1039/D0LC00153H ↗
24. 10.1002/adfm.20210672510.1002/adfm.202106725 ↗
25. 10.1002/adpr.20220023010.1002/adpr.202200230 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467-020-20284-z10.1038/s41467-020-20284-z ↗
27. 10.1039/D2LC00254J10.1039/D2LC00254J ↗
28. 10.1038/s41467-023-44068-310.1038/s41467-023-44068-3 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14846510.1016/j.cej.2023.148465 ↗
30. 10.1039/D2CP05975D10.1039/D2CP05975D ↗
31. Brundage, M.; Avin, S.; Clark, J.; Toner, H.; Eckersley, P.; Garfinkel, B.; Dafoe, A.; Scharre, P.; Zeitzoff, T.; Filar, B. The malicious use of artificial intelligence: Forecasting, prevention, and mitigation. 2018. arXiv:1802.07228. arXiv.org e-Print archive. https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07228.
32. 10.1038/s41598-023-50876-w10.1038/s41598-023-50876-w ↗
33. 10.1145/2133360.213336310.1145/2133360.2133363 ↗
34. Liu, F. T.; Ting, K. M.; Zhou, Z.H. In Isolation Forest, 2008 Eighth IEEE International conference on Data Mining; IEEE, 2008; pp 413–422.10.1109/ICDM.2008.17 ↗
35. Ashrapov, I. Tabular GANs for uneven distribution. 2020. arXiv:2010.00638. arXiv.org e-Print archive. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.00638.10.20944/preprints202010.0101.v1 ↗
36. 10.1145/342262210.1145/3422622 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c0163910.1021/acs.iecr.3c01639 ↗
38. Dubrovsky, I.; Dmitrenko, A.; Serov, N.; Vinogradov, V. Unveiling the Potential of AI for Nanomaterial Morphology Prediction. 2024. arXiv:2010.00638. arXiv.org e-Print archive. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.00638.
39. Hastie T. · 200910.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 ↗
40. Breiman L. · 201710.1201/9781315139470 ↗
41. Liaw A. · R News · 2002 · 2 · 18
42. 10.1214/aos/101320345110.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
43. James G. · 2013 · 11210.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7 ↗
44. 10.1007/BF0099401810.1007/BF00994018 ↗
45. Brownlee J. · 2018
46. Nair, V.; Hinton, G. E. In Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines, 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10); ACE, 2010; pp 807–814.
47. Kingma, D. P.; Ba, J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. 2014. arXiv:1412.6980arXiv:1412.6980. arXiv.org e-Print archive. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980.
48. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.11060610.1016/j.msec.2019.110606 ↗
49. 10.1007/s10404-017-1886-710.1007/s10404-017-1886-7 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.12577410.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125774 ↗
51. 10.1039/C9LC00637K10.1039/C9LC00637K ↗
52. 10.1021/nn403370e10.1021/nn403370e ↗
53. 10.1002/adma.20100433310.1002/adma.201004333 ↗
54. 10.1002/app.4514510.1002/app.45145 ↗
55. 10.1007/s12247-019-09419-y10.1007/s12247-019-09419-y ↗
56. 10.1038/s41598-020-76477-510.1038/s41598-020-76477-5 ↗
57. 10.3389/fmolb.2021.67754710.3389/fmolb.2021.677547 ↗
58. 10.1007/s10404-019-2198-x10.1007/s10404-019-2198-x ↗
59. 10.1002/adfm.20200349110.1002/adfm.202003491 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.16710.1016/j.cej.2018.03.167 ↗
61. 10.1002/adfm.20200785610.1002/adfm.202007856 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.cej.2010.12.03510.1016/j.cej.2010.12.035 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.ces.2024.12002810.1016/j.ces.2024.120028 ↗
64. 10.1002/elps.20110048210.1002/elps.201100482 ↗
65. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0313710.1021/acsomega.2c03137 ↗
66. 10.3390/ijms15122390910.3390/ijms151223909 ↗
67. 10.1038/s41467-022-35343-w10.1038/s41467-022-35343-w ↗
68. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b0006610.1021/acs.accounts.5b00066 ↗
69. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0350010.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03500 ↗
70. 10.1038/sdata.2017.12710.1038/sdata.2017.127 ↗
71. 10.1080/1062936X.2015.108018610.1080/1062936X.2015.1080186 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12842810.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128428 ↗
73. 10.3109/17435390.2016.116185710.3109/17435390.2016.1161857 ↗
74. 10.1126/sciadv.abf413010.1126/sciadv.abf4130 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.tox.2023.15369710.1016/j.tox.2023.153697 ↗
76. 10.1080/17435390.2022.215682310.1080/17435390.2022.2156823 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13016410.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130164 ↗
78. 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.1c0031010.1021/acs.chemrestox.1c00310 ↗
79. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0756210.1021/acsnano.8b07562 ↗