journal article·2018-10Open access

Balance Between Light Absorption and Recombination Losses in Solution‐Processed Small Molecule Solar Cells with Normal or Inverted Structures

Viktor V. Brus, Hang Ken Lee, Christopher M. Proctor, Michael Ford, Xiaofeng Liu, Mark A. Burgers, Jaechol Lee, Guillermo C. Bazan, Thuc‐Quyen Nguyen

Advanced Energy Materials· Volume 8· Issue 29

Abstract

Abstract Comparison of the photovoltaic properties of F3:fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells (where F3 is a donor molecule of intermediate dimensions) with normal and inverted structures as a function of photoactive layer thickness is carried out by using optical modeling and light‐dependent photoelectrical characterization. The larger short circuit current of inverted devices can be explained by higher light absorption in the active layer, relative to normal devices. However, worse charge extraction conditions and trap‐assisted recombination, in the bulk heterojunction blend in inverted devices, give rise to larger nongeminate recombination losses and an opposite thickness dependence of the short circuit current and fill factor than what is observed in counterparts with the conventional device architecture.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Fullerene Chemistry and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Polymers and Organic Solids Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of California at Santa Barbara Santa Barbara CA 93106 USA

Future Technology Research Center Corporate R&D, LG Chem Research Park, 188, Moonji‐ro Yuseong‐gu Daejeon 34122 Republic of Korea

Center for Energy Materials Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology, (KRICT) 141 Gajeongro Yuseong Daejeon 34114 Republic of Korea

Funding

Office of Naval Research · U.S. Department of Energy

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20130437310.1002/adma.201304373 ↗
2. 10.1038/nmat316010.1038/nmat3160 ↗
3. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.13910.1038/nphoton.2012.139 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20130508410.1002/adma.201305084 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41566-018-0104-910.1038/s41566-018-0104-9 ↗
6. 10.1021/ja310483w10.1021/ja310483w ↗
7. 10.1021/ja413144u10.1021/ja413144u ↗
8. 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.02.00210.1016/j.solmat.2011.02.002 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.orgel.2011.12.01910.1016/j.orgel.2011.12.019 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jechem.2015.10.00210.1016/j.jechem.2015.10.002 ↗
11. Chen D. · 2012 · 1
12. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.19010.1038/nphoton.2012.190 ↗
13. 10.1021/cr300110910.1021/cr3001109 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20100088310.1002/adma.201000883 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20120264310.1002/adfm.201202643 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.24520710.1103/PhysRevB.82.245207 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20140172510.1002/adma.201401725 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.240289010.1063/1.2402890 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.366386010.1063/1.3663860 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.12660210.1103/PhysRevLett.94.126602 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.188924010.1063/1.1889240 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.08.00810.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.08.008 ↗
23. 10.1002/aelm.20160043810.1002/aelm.201600438 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.282136810.1063/1.2821368 ↗
25. 10.1002/adfm.20110051410.1002/adfm.201100514 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.472986110.1063/1.4729861 ↗
27. 10.1021/jp308480u10.1021/jp308480u ↗
28. 10.1021/am302408w10.1021/am302408w ↗
29. 10.1039/C4EE02488E10.1039/C4EE02488E ↗
30. 10.1063/1.302809410.1063/1.3028094 ↗
31. Bube R. H. · 1992
32. 10.1016/0038-1101(72)90125-610.1016/0038-1101(72)90125-6 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20130339310.1002/adma.201303393 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.03520610.1103/PhysRevB.77.035206 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.11660210.1103/PhysRevLett.120.116602 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.275202410.1063/1.2752024 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.cplett.2006.02.06010.1016/j.cplett.2006.02.060 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.365175210.1063/1.3651752 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.20530710.1103/PhysRevB.81.205307 ↗
40. 10.1002/adma.20100430110.1002/adma.201004301 ↗