journal article·2024-02Open access

Rationalizing Performance Losses of Wide Bandgap Perovskite Solar Cells Evident in Data from the Perovskite Database

Klara Suchan, T. Jesper Jacobsson, Carolin Rehermann, Eva L. Unger, Thomas Kirchartz, Christian M. Wolff

Advanced Energy Materials· Volume 14· Issue 5

Abstract

Abstract Metal halide perovskites (MHPs) have become a widely studied class of semiconductors for various optoelectronic devices. The possibility to tune their bandgap (Eg) over a broad spectral range from 1.2 eV to 3 eV by compositional engineering makes them particularly attractive for light emitting devices and multi‐junction solar cells. In this metadata study, data from Peer‐reviewed publications available in the Perovskite Database (www.perovskitedatabase.com) is used to evaluate the current state of Eg tuning in wide Eg MHP semiconductors. Recent literature on wide Eg MHP semiconductors is examined and the data is extracted and uploaded onto the Perovskite Database. Beyond describing recent highlights and scientific breakthroughs, general trends are drawn from 45,000 individual experimental datasets of MHP solar cell devices. The historical evolution of MHP solar cells is recapitulated, and general conclusions are drawn about the current limits of device performance. Three dominant causes are identified and discussed for the degradation of performance relative to the Shockley‐Queisser (SQ) model's theoretical limit for single‐junction solar cells: 1) energetically mismatched selective transport materials for wide Eg MHPs, 2) lower optoelectronic quality of wide Eg MHP absorbers, and 3) dynamically evolving compositional heterogeneity due to light‐induced phase segregation phenomena.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of Chemical Physics and NanoLund Lund University Box 124 22100 Lund Sweden

Helmholtz‐Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH HySPRINT Innovation Lab: Hybrid Materials Formation and Scaling Kekuléstraße 5 12489 Berlin Germany

Institute of Photoelectronic Thin Film Devices and Technology Key Laboratory of Photoelectronic Thin Film Devices and Technology of Tianjin College of Electronic Information and Optical Engineering Nankai University Nankai Tianjin 300350 China

IEK5‐Photovoltaics Forschungszentrum Jülich 52425 Jülich Germany

Faculty of Engineering and CENIDE University of Duisburg‐Essen Carl‐Benz‐Straße 199 47057 Duisburg Germany

STI IEM PV‐LAB Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Rue de la Maladière 71b Neuchâtel 2000 Switzerland

Funding

Helmholtz Association · Vetenskapsrådet · H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions · Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung · Horizon 2020 · Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung · Bundesamt für Energie · Key Technologies Research and Development Program

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.32827210.1063/1.328272 ↗
2. 10.1016/0927-0248(96)00015-310.1016/0927-0248(96)00015-3 ↗
3. 10.1002/aenm.20170338510.1002/aenm.201703385 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41570-017-009510.1038/s41570-017-0095 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41560-018-0190-410.1038/s41560-018-0190-4 ↗
6. 10.1063/5.004761610.1063/5.0047616 ↗
7. 10.1039/D1TA04527J10.1039/D1TA04527J ↗
8. 10.1002/pip.372610.1002/pip.3726 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.173603410.1063/1.1736034 ↗
10. We would like to note that we discussed describing the theoretical limit calculated by Shockley and Queisser using different terminology but for the lack of better terminology decided not to. The racist and eugenicist views of William Shockley are undisputed yet the now often‐used alternative names “detailed balance limit” “thermodynamic limit” or “radiative limit” lack specificity. The SQ‐limit constitutes one specific case among the set of radiative or thermodynamic efficiency models and obeys the principle of detailed balance like many other models as well (incl. the Shockley‐Read‐Hall recombination model). However these are not mutually exclusive definitions cf. all elephants are animals not all animals are elephants.
11. 10.1038/s41563-020-0784-710.1038/s41563-020-0784-7 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0890310.1021/acsnano.0c08903 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.aam709310.1126/science.aam7093 ↗
14. 10.1142/1089410.1142/10894 ↗
15. 10.1063/5.004865310.1063/5.0048653 ↗
16. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.13410.1038/nphoton.2014.134 ↗
17. 10.1038/nnano.2015.9010.1038/nnano.2015.90 ↗
18. 10.1126/science.aam632310.1126/science.aam6323 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0053910.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00539 ↗
20. 10.1038/nature1413310.1038/nature14133 ↗
21. 10.1021/jz500211710.1021/jz5002117 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0190610.1021/acsenergylett.8b01906 ↗
23. 10.1002/aenm.20210252610.1002/aenm.202102526 ↗
24. 10.1002/pssa.20180087310.1002/pssa.201800873 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.8b1000510.1021/acsami.8b10005 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41560-021-00941-310.1038/s41560-021-00941-3 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.173603410.1063/1.1736034 ↗
28. 10.1039/C7TA00404D10.1039/C7TA00404D ↗
29. 10.1039/C9EE02162K10.1039/C9EE02162K ↗
30. 10.1016/j.solmat.2022.11209710.1016/j.solmat.2022.112097 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41586-021-03406-510.1038/s41586-021-03406-5 ↗
32. 10.1039/C4SC03141E10.1039/C4SC03141E ↗
33. 10.1016/j.trechm.2020.01.01010.1016/j.trechm.2020.01.010 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jlumin.2020.11707310.1016/j.jlumin.2020.117073 ↗
35. 10.1002/adfm.20220604710.1002/adfm.202206047 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41586-021-03285-w10.1038/s41586-021-03285-w ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0050510.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00505 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0156210.1021/acsenergylett.8b01562 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.matt.2019.11.00110.1016/j.matt.2019.11.001 ↗
40. 10.1002/aenm.20190257310.1002/aenm.201902573 ↗
41. C. M.Wolff bandgap_vs_S_vs_for_fixed_CTL.scapshttps://zenodo.org/records/10138389/files/bandgap_vs_S_for_fixed_CTL.scaps?download=1(accessed: November 2023).
42. 10.1002/pip.52410.1002/pip.524 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00825-110.1016/S0040-6090(99)00825-1 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41586-022-05541-z10.1038/s41586-022-05541-z ↗
45. 10.1021/ja210029w10.1021/ja210029w ↗
46. 10.1039/C4MH00173G10.1039/C4MH00173G ↗
47. 10.1002/aenm.20120067310.1002/aenm.201200673 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.02460210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.024602 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0488410.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04884 ↗
50. 10.1038/s41566-018-0154-z10.1038/s41566-018-0154-z ↗
51. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0110410.1021/acsenergylett.0c01104 ↗
52. 10.1063/1.184060610.1063/1.1840606 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.08530310.1103/PhysRevB.76.085303 ↗
54. 10.1038/ncomms1394110.1038/ncomms13941 ↗
55. K.Suchan Ph.D. Thesis Lund University Lund2023.
56. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0058910.1021/acsenergylett.7b00589 ↗
57. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0070710.1021/acsaem.1c00707 ↗
58. 10.1063/5.006281810.1063/5.0062818 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.07.01110.1016/j.joule.2021.07.011 ↗
60. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0112710.1021/acs.jpclett.0c01127 ↗
61. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0136910.1021/acsenergylett.8b01369 ↗
62. 10.1126/science.adf019410.1126/science.adf0194 ↗