Accelerated Perovskite Oxide Development for Thermochemical Energy Storage by a High‐Throughput Combinatorial Approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The structural and compositional flexibility of perovskite oxides and their complex yet tunable redox properties offer unique optimization opportunities for thermochemical energy storage (TCES). To improve the relatively inefficient and empirical‐based approaches, a high‐throughput combinatorial approach for accelerated development and optimization of perovskite oxides for TCES is reported here. Specifically, thermodynamic‐based screening criteria are applied to the high‐throughput density functional theory (DFT) simulation results of over 2000 A/B‐site doped SrFeO3−δ. 61 promising TCES candidates are selected based on the DFT prediction. Of these, 45 materials with pure perovskite phases are thoroughly evaluated. The experimental results support the effectiveness of the high‐throughput approach in determining both the oxygen capacity and the oxidation enthalpy of the perovskite oxides. Many of the screened materials exhibit promising performance under practical operating conditions: Sr0.875Ba0.125FeO3−δ exhibits a chemical energy storage density of 85 kJ kgABO3−1 under an isobaric condition (with air) between 400 and 800 °C whereas Sr0.125Ca0.875Fe0.25Mn0.75O3−δ demonstrates an energy density of 157 kJ kgABO3−1 between 400 °C/0.2 atm O2 and 1100 °C/0.01 atm O2. An improved set of optimization criteria is also developed, based on a combination of DFT and experimental results, to improve the effectiveness for accelerated development of redox‐active perovskite oxides.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity · Adsorption and Cooling Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering North Carolina State University 911 Partners Way Raleigh NC 27695‐7905 USA
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering Northwestern University Evanston IL 60208 USA
Funding
National Science Foundation
References (92)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C8EE01419A10.1039/C8EE01419A ↗
2. 10.1039/D0EE00787K10.1039/D0EE00787K ↗
3. British Petroleum. BP statistical review of world energy 2022 https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html(accessed: March 2023).
4. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.07410.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.074 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.04810.1016/j.renene.2020.08.048 ↗
6. F.Liu F.Wang J.Yan G.Xu T.Bi 2020 5th Asia Conf. Power Electr. Eng. (ACPEE) Chengdu China June2020.
7. 10.3390/app1009314210.3390/app10093142 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.11329510.1016/j.enconman.2020.113295 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.07.01410.1016/j.pnsc.2008.07.014 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.13910.1016/j.rser.2017.03.139 ↗
11. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c0158610.1021/acssuschemeng.0c01586 ↗
12. 10.1109/TPWRS.2019.294072510.1109/TPWRS.2019.2940725 ↗
13. 10.1007/s11814-021-0789-110.1007/s11814-021-0789-1 ↗
14. Global Thermal Energy Storage Capacity 2019–2030 https://www.Statista.Com/statistics/1307219/thermal-energy-storage-capacity-global/(accessed: February2023).
15. T.Bauer N.Pfleger D.Laing W.‐D.Steinmann M.Eck S.Kaesche Molten Salts Chemistry Elsevier2013 pp.415–438.10.1016/B978-0-12-398538-5.00020-2 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.rser.2019.10932810.1016/j.rser.2019.109328 ↗
17. Z.Ma R.Zhang F.Sawaged ASME 2017 11th Int. Conf. Energy Sustainability collocated ASME 2017 Power Conf. Joint ICOPE‐17 ASME 2017 15th Int. Conf. Fuel Cell Sci. Eng. Technol. ASME 2017 Nuclear Forum Charlotte North Carolina USA 2017.
18. 10.3390/en1404119710.3390/en14041197 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.11373310.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113733 ↗
20. 10.1039/D1EE00527H10.1039/D1EE00527H ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.11595010.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115950 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.scib.2017.01.01910.1016/j.scib.2017.01.019 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10098-020-01997-710.1007/s10098-020-01997-7 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.01410.1016/j.rser.2013.12.014 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.est.2022.10437710.1016/j.est.2022.104377 ↗
26. 10.3389/fenrg.2020.0013710.3389/fenrg.2020.00137 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.11.11110.1016/j.egypro.2017.11.111 ↗
28. 10.3390/en1420684710.3390/en14206847 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.01710.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.017 ↗
30. 10.3390/en1322585910.3390/en13225859 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.11555310.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115553 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.12878910.1016/j.cej.2021.128789 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.15986610.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159866 ↗
34. 10.1002/cssc.20190269810.1002/cssc.201902698 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.ssi.2004.07.00110.1016/j.ssi.2004.07.001 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.04610.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.046 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.02010.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.020 ↗
38. 10.1002/ente.20130009910.1002/ente.201300099 ↗
39. 10.1039/C7TA00822H10.1039/C7TA00822H ↗
40. 10.1002/er.346710.1002/er.3467 ↗
41. 10.1149/07207.0011ecst10.1149/07207.0011ecst ↗
42. 10.1016/j.solener.2017.05.01010.1016/j.solener.2017.05.010 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.est.2022.10517510.1016/j.est.2022.105175 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.09810.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.098 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsami.0c1820710.1021/acsami.0c18207 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.est.2021.10279310.1016/j.est.2021.102793 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0518210.1021/acs.iecr.0c05182 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.10.02610.1016/j.actamat.2015.10.026 ↗
49. 10.1039/C6TA06644E10.1039/C6TA06644E ↗
50. 10.1016/j.solener.2015.05.04010.1016/j.solener.2015.05.040 ↗
51. 10.1063/1.494910410.1063/1.4949104 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.08110.1016/j.energy.2019.01.081 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.10289110.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102891 ↗
54. 10.1039/C6EE02763F10.1039/C6EE02763F ↗
55. 10.1039/D0CP00275E10.1039/D0CP00275E ↗
56. 10.1016/j.est.2021.10250110.1016/j.est.2021.102501 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.ssi.2017.06.01410.1016/j.ssi.2017.06.014 ↗
58. 10.3390/pr910181710.3390/pr9101817 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.est.2023.10669510.1016/j.est.2023.106695 ↗
60. 10.1039/D0TA02031A10.1039/D0TA02031A ↗
61. 10.1016/j.solener.2016.05.03110.1016/j.solener.2016.05.031 ↗
62. 10.1039/C9TA09307A10.1039/C9TA09307A ↗
63. 10.1039/D0CP02835E10.1039/D0CP02835E ↗
64. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0465810.1021/acs.chemmater.0c04658 ↗
65. 10.1038/sdata.2017.15310.1038/sdata.2017.153 ↗
66. 10.1021/jacs.1c0557010.1021/jacs.1c05570 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.11604010.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116040 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.ssi.2013.10.04610.1016/j.ssi.2013.10.046 ↗
69. 10.1039/C9EE00085B10.1039/C9EE00085B ↗
70. 10.1016/j.ssi.2004.06.01110.1016/j.ssi.2004.06.011 ↗
71. 10.1002/advs.20220281110.1002/advs.202202811 ↗
72. 10.1039/C7SE00516D10.1039/C7SE00516D ↗
73. 10.1126/sciadv.aav069310.1126/sciadv.aav0693 ↗
74. 10.1039/D1EE02889H10.1039/D1EE02889H ↗
75. 10.1016/j.est.2018.02.00710.1016/j.est.2018.02.007 ↗
76. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0361210.1021/acssuschemeng.1c03612 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.ssi.2021.11569210.1016/j.ssi.2021.115692 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.11.00210.1016/j.electacta.2012.11.002 ↗
79. 10.1039/D0CP01049A10.1039/D0CP01049A ↗
80. 10.1016/j.ces.2019.03.05710.1016/j.ces.2019.03.057 ↗
81. 10.3390/ma1322512310.3390/ma13225123 ↗
82. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
83. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
84. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.02.02310.1016/j.commatsci.2011.02.023 ↗
86. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.15520810.1103/PhysRevB.85.155208 ↗
87. 10.1103/PhysRevB.44.94310.1103/PhysRevB.44.943 ↗
88. Lee Y. L. · Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. · 2009 · 80 · 308
89. 10.1002/anie.20090678010.1002/anie.200906780 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.02110.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.021 ↗
91. Frisch M. J. · 2016
92. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.11.01810.1016/j.fuproc.2015.11.018 ↗