Deep Energetic Trap States in Organic Photovoltaic Devices
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The nature of energetic disorder in organic semiconductors is poorly understood. In photovoltaics, energetic disorder leads to reductions in the open circuit voltage and contributes to other loss processes. In this work, three independent optoelectronic methods were used to determine the long‐lived carrier populations in a high efficiency N‐alkylthieno[3,4‐c]pyrrole‐4,6‐dione (TPD) based polymer: fullerene solar cell. In the TPD co‐polymer, all methods indicate the presence of a long‐lived carrier population of ∼ 1015 cm−3 on timescales ≥ 100 μs. Additionally, the behavior of these photovoltaic devices under optical bias is consistent with deep energetic lying trap states. Comparative measurements were also performed on high efficiency poly‐3‐hexylthiophene (P3HT): fullerene solar cells; however a similar long‐lived carrier population was not observed. This observation is consistent with a higher acceptor concentration (doping) in P3HT than in the TPD‐based copolymer.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pip.115010.1002/pip.1150 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.220917610.1063/1.2209176 ↗
3. 10.1002/cssc.20090002910.1002/cssc.200900029 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.361055110.1063/1.3610551 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.356751610.1063/1.3567516 ↗
6. 10.1002/aenm.20100002310.1002/aenm.201000023 ↗
7. 10.1073/pnas.100436310710.1073/pnas.1004363107 ↗
8. 10.1002/cphc.20070057510.1002/cphc.200700575 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0927-796X(00)00009-710.1016/S0927-796X(00)00009-7 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.21660110.1103/PhysRevLett.91.216601 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20050115210.1002/adma.200501152 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.07520810.1103/PhysRevB.84.075208 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.15520910.1103/PhysRevB.67.155209 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.23520710.1103/PhysRevB.70.235207 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.335812110.1063/1.3358121 ↗
16. 10.1021/jp200234m10.1021/jp200234m ↗
17. 10.1021/ja103275u10.1021/ja103275u ↗
18. 10.1021/ja101888b10.1021/ja101888b ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.16520710.1103/PhysRevB.83.165207 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.03520510.1103/PhysRevB.83.035205 ↗
21. 10.1088/0370-1301/70/7/30410.1088/0370-1301/70/7/304 ↗
22. 10.1088/0370-1328/76/6/30210.1088/0370-1328/76/6/302 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.180517510.1063/1.1805175 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.300631610.1063/1.3006316 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.317733710.1063/1.3177337 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.357339410.1063/1.3573394 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.12.245510.1103/PhysRevB.12.2455 ↗
28. We consider a full treatment on this photocurrent behavior elsewhere using a comprehensive Shockley‐Reed Hall model to obtain detail about the actual shape of the density of states. R. C. I. MacKenzie C. G. Shuttle M. L. Chabinyc J. Nelson unpublished.
29. 10.1021/ja964229j10.1021/ja964229j ↗
30. 10.1063/1.169119010.1063/1.1691190 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.09.03510.1016/j.cplett.2008.09.035 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.solmat.2009.10.01510.1016/j.solmat.2009.10.015 ↗
33. 10.1002/adfm.20110043210.1002/adfm.201100432 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.155993310.1063/1.1559933 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.07.02310.1016/j.orgel.2010.07.023 ↗