Advancing Transition Metal Oxide Photoelectrodes for Efficient Solar‐Driven Hydrogen Generation: Strategies and Insights
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting is a promising approach for green hydrogen (H2) generation, leveraging solar energy to produce a clean and sustainable fuel alternative. Transition metal oxides (TMOs) have emerged as potential photoelectrode materials due to their tunable optoelectronic properties, earth abundance, and chemical stability. However, their practical application remains limited by challenges such as narrow light absorption range, inefficient charge carrier dynamics, and sluggish water‐splitting kinetics. To overcome these limitations, various enhancement strategies have been explored. This review highlights three key approaches to develop high‐performance TMO‐based photoelectrodes suitable for industrial applications: (i) element doping, which tailors electronic structures to improve conductivity and charge separation, (ii) integration with graphene‐based materials, which facilitates charge transfer and enhances surface reaction kinetics, and (iii) surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and localized SPR (LSPR) effects, which broaden light absorption and generate hot charge carriers. Additionally, this review provides a comprehensive analysis of the fundamental performance parameters governing TMO‐based photoelectrodes and discusses future research directions to optimize their efficiency. Combining these strategies holds significant potential for developing scalable, high‐performance PEC systems for sustainable hydrogen production.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology Dhaka 1205 Bangladesh
Department of Electrical Computer and Energy Engineering Arizona State University Tempe Arizona 85281 USA
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332 USA
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/en1206096410.3390/en12060964 ↗
2. 10.1038/ncomms1323710.1038/ncomms13237 ↗
3. 10.1021/cr100232610.1021/cr1002326 ↗
4. 10.1039/C8CS00638E10.1039/C8CS00638E ↗
5. 10.1039/D1TA10203F10.1039/D1TA10203F ↗
6. 10.1016/j.enconman.2024.11903810.1016/j.enconman.2024.119038 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.02.15610.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.02.156 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.510978510.1063/1.5109785 ↗
9. 10.1039/C6CS00306K10.1039/C6CS00306K ↗
10. 10.1557/JMR.2010.002010.1557/JMR.2010.0020 ↗
11. 10.1038/natrevmats.2015.1010.1038/natrevmats.2015.10 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20211273810.1002/adfm.202112738 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.125142810.1126/science.1251428 ↗
14. 10.1038/ncomms928610.1038/ncomms9286 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41467-019-12977-x10.1038/s41467-019-12977-x ↗
16. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.2810.1038/nenergy.2017.28 ↗
17. 10.1002/aenm.20200328610.1002/aenm.202003286 ↗
18. 10.1039/C6CS00918B10.1039/C6CS00918B ↗
19. 10.1016/S1872-2067(21)64028-710.1016/S1872-2067(21)64028-7 ↗
20. A.Zaleska‐Medynska Metal oxide‐based photocatalysis: fundamentals and prospects for application Elsevier 2018.10.1016/B978-0-12-811634-0.00005-6 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0148110.1021/acs.chemmater.0c01481 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12510110.1016/j.cej.2020.125101 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0026110.1021/acsaem.1c00261 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.11827910.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118279 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.02710.1016/j.nanoen.2016.09.027 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41598-022-20045-610.1038/s41598-022-20045-6 ↗
27. 10.1002/adfm.20241609110.1002/adfm.202416091 ↗
28. 10.1021/jz400298310.1021/jz4002983 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0214310.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02143 ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20170055510.1002/aenm.201700555 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.mtadv.2024.10055410.1016/j.mtadv.2024.100554 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsanm.0c0103510.1021/acsanm.0c01035 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.21486410.1016/j.ccr.2022.214864 ↗
34. 10.1007/s41918-022-00136-810.1007/s41918-022-00136-8 ↗
35. 10.1002/sstr.20210022910.1002/sstr.202100229 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.mtsust.2022.10011810.1016/j.mtsust.2022.100118 ↗
37. 10.1002/adma.20240116310.1002/adma.202401163 ↗
38. 10.1002/advs.20230513910.1002/advs.202305139 ↗
39. Liang X. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2025
40. 10.1016/S0167-2738(99)00312-410.1016/S0167-2738(99)00312-4 ↗
41. A. C.Silva J. M.deOliveira L. R.Floresta M. V.daSilva J. L. d. S.Duarte K. B.daSilva E. A.daSilva Filho V. P.Bittar A. L.Borges G. L.Fernandes A. S.Silva E. V.Guimaraes R. S.Silva C. L.Zanta L.Anhezini N. O.Dantas inTransition Metal Compounds‐Synthesis Properties and Application. IntechOpen 2021.
42. 10.1038/s41467-020-18484-810.1038/s41467-020-18484-8 ↗
43. Park J. · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2023
44. 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.03.00610.1016/j.mattod.2013.03.006 ↗
45. 10.3390/catal1008092110.3390/catal10080921 ↗
46. 10.1021/ja200086g10.1021/ja200086g ↗
47. 10.1002/elsa.20210007910.1002/elsa.202100079 ↗
48. 10.1039/C9SE00129H10.1039/C9SE00129H ↗
49. 10.3762/bjnano.8.7410.3762/bjnano.8.74 ↗
50. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.23810.1038/nphoton.2013.238 ↗
51. 10.1002/cssc.20140208910.1002/cssc.201402089 ↗
52. 10.1002/aenm.20170055910.1002/aenm.201700559 ↗
53. 10.3390/nano1212195710.3390/nano12121957 ↗
54. 10.1002/slct.20170031910.1002/slct.201700319 ↗
55. 10.1039/C9TA13452B10.1039/C9TA13452B ↗
56. 10.1039/D1RA09070D10.1039/D1RA09070D ↗
57. 10.1016/S1010-6030(97)00118-410.1016/S1010-6030(97)00118-4 ↗
58. 10.1155/2016/407314210.1155/2016/4073142 ↗
59. 10.1039/C8EE00772A10.1039/C8EE00772A ↗
60. 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b0000210.1021/acs.accounts.8b00002 ↗
61. 10.1038/s41467-019-11586-y10.1038/s41467-019-11586-y ↗
62. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.29410.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.294 ↗
63. 10.1038/ncomms1370610.1038/ncomms13706 ↗
64. Mamun A. A. · Heliyon · 2023 · 9
65. P.Gao Z.Li M.Gao J.Cai L.Tao inJournal of Physics: Conference Seriesvol.2483. IOP Publishing 2023 pp.012010.10.1088/1742-6596/2483/1/012010 ↗
66. 10.1021/cr200102n10.1021/cr200102n ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.05.16910.1016/j.jcis.2022.05.169 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.10.04610.1016/j.carbon.2022.10.046 ↗
69. 10.1039/C5TA03362D10.1039/C5TA03362D ↗
70. 10.1016/j.coelec.2022.10117610.1016/j.coelec.2022.101176 ↗
71. 10.1038/s41467-023-41187-910.1038/s41467-023-41187-9 ↗
72. 10.1039/C3EE42722F10.1039/C3EE42722F ↗
73. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.04510.1016/j.rser.2016.06.045 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.12219310.1016/j.cej.2019.122193 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15631110.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156311 ↗
76. 10.1002/cctc.20150048510.1002/cctc.201500485 ↗
77. Z.Chen H. N.Dinh E.Miller Photoelectrochemical water splitting vol.344 Springer 2013.10.1007/978-1-4614-8298-7 ↗
78. 10.1002/celc.20200051510.1002/celc.202000515 ↗
79. 10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.2c0007010.1021/acsmeasuresciau.2c00070 ↗
80. 10.1039/C3CP55473B10.1039/C3CP55473B ↗
81. 10.2533/chimia.2013.15510.2533/chimia.2013.155 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.mssp.2021.10598510.1016/j.mssp.2021.105985 ↗
83. 10.3390/catal1301009310.3390/catal13010093 ↗
84. 10.1002/ep.1418610.1002/ep.14186 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.02.11710.1016/j.jcis.2022.02.117 ↗
86. 10.1039/D2MH00632D10.1039/D2MH00632D ↗
87. 10.1002/chem.20220287210.1002/chem.202202872 ↗
88. 10.1080/01614940.2024.244066410.1080/01614940.2024.2440664 ↗
89. 10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.00510.1016/j.joule.2021.05.005 ↗
90. 10.1002/anie.20160860110.1002/anie.201608601 ↗
91. 10.1039/C5CP03283K10.1039/C5CP03283K ↗
92. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.15967110.1016/j.cej.2025.159671 ↗
93. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.25410.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.254 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.jmat.2023.05.01410.1016/j.jmat.2023.05.014 ↗
95. 10.1007/s42247-020-00155-510.1007/s42247-020-00155-5 ↗
96. 10.1016/j.snb.2020.12940310.1016/j.snb.2020.129403 ↗
97. 10.3390/nano1318258610.3390/nano13182586 ↗
98. A.Maragno Ph.D. Thesis Université Claude Bernard‐Lyon I 2024.
99. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.11.39310.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.11.393 ↗
100. 10.1021/am200393h10.1021/am200393h ↗