journal article·2024-08-12

Sensitivity and Validation of Porous Membrane Electrical Cell Substrate Impedance Spectroscopy (PM-ECIS) for Measuring Endothelial Barrier Properties

Alisa Ugodnikov, Oleg Chebotarev, Henrik Persson, Craig A. Simmons

Publisher page

Abstract

Measurement of endothelial and epithelial barrier integrity is important for a variety of in vitro models, including Transwell assays, cocultures, and organ-on-chip platforms. Barrier resistance is typically measured by trans-endothelial electrical resistance (TEER), but TEER is invasive and cannot accurately measure isolated monolayer resistance in coculture or most organ-on-chip devices. These limitations are addressed by porous membrane electrical cell–substrate impedance sensing (PM-ECIS), which measures barrier integrity in cell monolayers grown directly on permeable membranes patterned with electrodes. Here, we advanced the design and utility of PM-ECIS by investigating its sensitivity to working electrode size and correlation with TEER. Gold electrodes were fabricated on porous membrane inserts using hot embossing and UV lithography, with working electrode diameters of 250, 500, and 750 μm within the same insert. Sensitivity to resistance changes (4 kHz) during endothelial barrier formation was inversely proportional to electrode size, with the smallest being the most sensitive ( p < 0.001). Similarly, smaller electrodes were most sensitive to changes in impedance (40 kHz) corresponding to cell spreading and proliferation ( p < 0.001). Barrier disruption with both EGTA and thrombin was detectable by all electrode sizes. Resistances measured by PM-ECIS vs TEER for sodium chloride solutions were positively and significantly correlated for all electrode sizes ( r > 0.9; p < 0.0001), but only with 750 μm electrodes for endothelial monolayers ( r = 0.71; p = 0.058). These data inform the design and selection of PM-ECIS electrodes for specific applications and support PM-ECIS as a promising alternative to conventional TEER for direct, noninvasive, real-time assessment of cells cultured on porous membranes in conventional and organ-on-chip barrier models.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Translational Biology & Engineering Program, Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Toronto, ON M5G 1M1, Canada

Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto , ON M5S 3G9, Canada

Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada

Funding

Ontario Centre of Innovation · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.bios.2019.11134010.1016/j.bios.2019.111340 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1359-6446(05)03379-910.1016/S1359-6446(05)03379-9 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20160659610.1002/adma.201606596 ↗
4. 10.1177/221106821456102510.1177/2211068214561025 ↗
5. 10.1039/C7LC00412E10.1039/C7LC00412E ↗
6. 10.1186/2045-8118-10-510.1186/2045-8118-10-5 ↗
7. 10.1242/dev.14343810.1242/dev.143438 ↗
8. 10.1039/C4LC01219D10.1039/C4LC01219D ↗
9. 10.1021/ac902934510.1021/ac9029345 ↗
10. 10.1039/c2lc40094d10.1039/c2lc40094d ↗
11. 10.1007/s10439-014-1086-510.1007/s10439-014-1086-5 ↗
12. 10.1039/C3LC51304A10.1039/C3LC51304A ↗
13. 10.1007/s10544-012-9699-710.1007/s10544-012-9699-7 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.07.11010.1016/j.snb.2015.07.110 ↗
15. 10.1039/C7LC00155J10.1039/C7LC00155J ↗
16. 10.1038/s41467-019-10588-010.1038/s41467-019-10588-0 ↗
17. 10.1073/pnas.88.17.789610.1073/pnas.88.17.7896 ↗
18. 10.1006/excr.2000.491910.1006/excr.2000.4919 ↗
19. 10.2144/04374ST0310.2144/04374ST03 ↗
20. 10.1038/srep2367110.1038/srep23671 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41378-020-00208-z10.1038/s41378-020-00208-z ↗
22. 10.1021/acsabm.4c0011410.1021/acsabm.4c00114 ↗
23. 10.1002/smll.20210178510.1002/smll.202101785 ↗
24. 10.1007/s00424-014-1674-010.1007/s00424-014-1674-0 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.03.04710.1016/j.snb.2017.03.047 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.bios.2008.03.01810.1016/j.bios.2008.03.018 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.bios.2008.10.02610.1016/j.bios.2008.10.026 ↗
28. 10.1155/2008/38498210.1155/2008/384982 ↗
29. 10.1126/sciadv.aat211110.1126/sciadv.aat2111 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0956-5663(03)00269-010.1016/S0956-5663(03)00269-0 ↗
31. 10.1152/ajpgi.00262.200410.1152/ajpgi.00262.2004 ↗
32. 10.1371/journal.pone.003208410.1371/journal.pone.0032084 ↗
33. 10.21769/BioProtoc.335110.21769/BioProtoc.3351 ↗
34. 10.3390/bios1206039010.3390/bios12060390 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.snb.2019.02.09810.1016/j.snb.2019.02.098 ↗
36. 10.1016/0014-4827(83)90178-710.1016/0014-4827(83)90178-7 ↗
37. 10.1242/jcs.20760510.1242/jcs.207605 ↗
38. 10.3390/bios1205029310.3390/bios12050293 ↗