Enhancing the Energy‐Storage Density and Breakdown Strength in PbZrO3/Pb0.9La0.1Zr0.52Ti0.48O3‐Derived Antiferroelectric/Relaxor‐Ferroelectric Multilayers
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Multilayer thin‐film dielectric capacitors with high energy‐storage performance and fast charge/discharge speed have significantly affected the development of miniaturized pulsed‐power devices. Here, the interfacial strain in epitaxial multilayers of antiferroelectric PbZrO3 and relaxor‐ferroelectric Pb0.9La0.1Zr0.52Ti0.48O3 is shown to significantly enhance the maximum polarization of the multilayer thin‐film capacitors, beyond that of the composing individual layers. Insights obtained from atomically resolved energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy and high‐resolution X‐ray diffraction analysis of the interface and domain structure are used to develop phenomenological models that explain the observed trends in breakdown strength and energy‐storage density as a function of multilayer period number. The underlying mechanism is the mechanical coupling between the layers that depends on the individual layer thicknesses. These factors result in a strongly enhanced recoverable energy‐storage density (increased by a factor of 4 to ≈128.4 J cm−3) with high efficiency (≈81.2%). Moreover, the multilayer films show almost fatigue‐free energy‐storage performance after 1010 switching cycles, even at elevated temperatures up to 220 °C, demonstrating their robustness. The outstanding properties show the great potential of epitaxial multilayers for energy‐storage applications, due to the well‐defined separate layers and coupling of properties across the interfaces, not present in ceramic composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies · Dielectric materials and actuators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology University of Twente P.O. Box 217 Enschede 7500 AE The Netherlands
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adfm.20180366510.1002/adfm.201803665 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0031310.1021/acsenergylett.1c00313 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20160442710.1002/adma.201604427 ↗
4. 10.1039/D0TA12332C10.1039/D0TA12332C ↗
5. 10.1038/s41467-018-04189-610.1038/s41467-018-04189-6 ↗
6. 10.1039/D0NR04479B10.1039/D0NR04479B ↗
7. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070317-12443510.1146/annurev-matsci-070317-124435 ↗
8. 10.1142/S2010135X1330001610.1142/S2010135X13300016 ↗
9. 10.1039/c1cp22659b10.1039/c1cp22659b ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.11.00210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2019.11.002 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.abi768710.1126/science.abi7687 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.9b1321510.1021/acsami.9b13215 ↗
13. 10.1126/science.abb063110.1126/science.abb0631 ↗
14. 10.1016/B978-0-12-813856-4.00010-710.1016/B978-0-12-813856-4.00010-7 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41467-017-02040-y10.1038/s41467-017-02040-y ↗
16. 10.1039/C7TA00665A10.1039/C7TA00665A ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0425110.1021/acs.jpcc.8b04251 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.08.02710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.08.027 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0079110.1021/acsnano.0c00791 ↗
20. 10.1007/BF0027533610.1007/BF00275336 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmat.2020.12.00910.1016/j.jmat.2020.12.009 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10854-018-8553-y10.1007/s10854-018-8553-y ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.04.01010.1016/j.ensm.2021.04.010 ↗
24. 10.1038/nmat156010.1038/nmat1560 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41563-018-0112-710.1038/s41563-018-0112-7 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.18430110.1103/PhysRevB.83.184301 ↗
27. 10.3390/polym1209197210.3390/polym12091972 ↗
28. 10.1039/C7TA10271B10.1039/C7TA10271B ↗
29. 10.1063/1.508808510.1063/1.5088085 ↗
30. 10.1039/C8TA09396B10.1039/C8TA09396B ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.0c0556010.1021/acsami.0c05560 ↗
32. 10.1002/aenm.20190422910.1002/aenm.201904229 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.06.02810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.06.028 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.10.10110.1016/j.apsusc.2008.10.101 ↗
35. 10.1021/cm203042q10.1021/cm203042q ↗
36. 10.1016/j.tsf.2018.05.04810.1016/j.tsf.2018.05.048 ↗
37. The pseudocubic lattice parameter is usually calculated from the unit cell volume apc = (Vpc)1/3 = 4.139 Å. For the bulk orthorhombic unit cellVucO≈aObOcO≈2Vpc=2VPZbulk${V_{{\rm{ucO}}}} \approx {{\rm{a}}_{\rm{O}}}{{\rm{b}}_{\rm{O}}}{{\rm{c}}_{\rm{O}}} \approx 2{V_{{\rm{pc}}}} = 2V_{{\rm{PZ}}}^{{\rm{bulk}}}$sinceaO≈bO≈apc2${{\rm{a}}_{\rm{O}}} \approx {{\rm{b}}_{\rm{O}}} \approx {{\rm{a}}_{{\rm{pc}}}}\sqrt 2 $. In our films the PZO unit cell is tetragonal hence the in‐plane lattice parameters are equal apc O = bpc O. Further assuming that the out‐of‐plane lattice parameter is equal to the bulk value cObulk=cO$c_{\rm{O}}^{{\rm{bulk}}} = {c_{\rm{O}}}$ = 4.113 Å we findaPZbulk=apc O=VucO/2cO$a_{{\rm{PZ}}}^{{\rm{bulk}}} = {a_{{\rm{pc}} {\rm{O}}}} = \sqrt {{V_{{\rm{ucO}}}}{\rm{/}}2{c_{\rm{O}}}} $ = 4.151 Å. The used orthorhombic lattice parameters are fromhttps://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201907208.10.1002/adma.201907208 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41598-021-93968-110.1038/s41598-021-93968-1 ↗
39. 10.1039/D0TC05750A10.1039/D0TC05750A ↗
40. 10.1088/0022-3727/47/21/21530210.1088/0022-3727/47/21/215302 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.492693310.1063/1.4926933 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.02305610.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023056 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.cap.2019.06.00510.1016/j.cap.2019.06.005 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10541210.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105412 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0503110.1021/acsomega.0c05031 ↗
46. 10.1007/s42114-018-0041-610.1007/s42114-018-0041-6 ↗
47. 10.1063/5.003871910.1063/5.0038719 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.319354810.1063/1.3193548 ↗
49. 10.1002/pssr.20140938310.1002/pssr.201409383 ↗
50. 10.1063/1.217409510.1063/1.2174095 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.07.02610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.07.026 ↗