Voltage Losses in Organic Solar Cells: Understanding the Contributions of Intramolecular Vibrations to Nonradiative Recombinations
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The large voltage losses usually encountered in organic solar cells significantly limit the power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) of these devices, with the result that the current highest PCE values in single‐junction organic photovoltaic remain smaller than for other solar cell technologies, such as crystalline silicon or perovskite solar cells. In particular, the nonradiative recombinations to the electronic ground state from the lowest‐energy charge‐transfer (CT) states at the donor–acceptor interfaces in the active layer of organic devices, are responsible for a significant part of the voltage losses. Here, to better comprehend the nonradiative voltage loss mechanisms, a fully quantum‐mechanical rate formula is employed within the framework of time‐dependent perturbation theory, combined with density functional theory. The objective is to uncover the specific contributions of intramolecular vibrations to the CT‐state nonradiative recombinations in several model systems, which include small‐molecule and polymer donors as well as fullerene and nonfullerene acceptors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Perovskite Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory for Computational and Theoretical Chemistry of Advanced Materials KAUST Solar Center Physical Science and Engineering Division King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal 23955‐6900 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Center for Organic Photonics and Electronics Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332‐0400 USA
Funding
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology · Office of Naval Research
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nenergy.2015.2710.1038/nenergy.2015.27 ↗
2. 10.1021/jacs.7b0267710.1021/jacs.7b02677 ↗
3. 10.1039/C5EE03380B10.1039/C5EE03380B ↗
4. 10.1126/science.122860410.1126/science.1228604 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20170014410.1002/adma.201700144 ↗
6. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.10210.1038/nenergy.2017.102 ↗
7. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.910.1038/nenergy.2017.9 ↗
8. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.6910.1038/nphoton.2009.69 ↗
9. 10.1038/nphoton.2009.19210.1038/nphoton.2009.192 ↗
10. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.19010.1038/nphoton.2012.190 ↗
11. 10.1021/ar900099h10.1021/ar900099h ↗
12. 10.1038/nature1233910.1038/nature12339 ↗
13. 10.1002/aenm.20150012310.1002/aenm.201500123 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.12520410.1103/PhysRevB.81.125204 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20130131910.1002/adma.201301319 ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20080005610.1002/adfm.200800056 ↗
17. 10.1021/jp110982m10.1021/jp110982m ↗
18. 10.1002/aenm.20110054910.1002/aenm.201100549 ↗
19. 10.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-11214410.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-112144 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0346710.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03467 ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20160271310.1002/aenm.201602713 ↗
22. 10.1021/ja905975w10.1021/ja905975w ↗
23. 10.1002/aenm.20160132510.1002/aenm.201601325 ↗
24. 10.1103/RevModPhys.65.59910.1103/RevModPhys.65.599 ↗
25. 10.1021/cr050140x10.1021/cr050140x ↗
26. 10.1021/ar400306k10.1021/ar400306k ↗
27. 10.1021/jacs.6b1285710.1021/jacs.6b12857 ↗
28. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.5310.1038/nenergy.2017.53 ↗
29. 10.1039/C6SC00839A10.1039/C6SC00839A ↗
30. 10.1021/jz500825q10.1021/jz500825q ↗
31. 10.1002/0471264318.ch110.1002/0471264318.ch1 ↗
32. 10.1039/B816406C10.1039/B816406C ↗
33. 10.1039/C4CP04826A10.1039/C4CP04826A ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b0012610.1021/acs.jctc.6b00126 ↗
35. 10.1021/jp508050n10.1021/jp508050n ↗
36. 10.1146/annurev.pc.35.100184.00225310.1146/annurev.pc.35.100184.002253 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b0019910.1021/acs.accounts.5b00199 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0068810.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00688 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b0022510.1021/acs.jctc.6b00225 ↗
40. Frisch M. J. · 2009