Interface Contact Optimization via Phosphomolybdic Acid Enables 24.9% Efficiency in MoOX-Based Silicon Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The development of cost-effective carrier-selective passivating contacts is critical for enhancing the commercial feasibility of silicon compound solar cells. Molybdenum oxide (MoO X ) has garnered considerable interest as a promising hole transport layer (HTLs). A key advantage of MoO X is high work function, in addition to the low-cost processability. However, in silicon photovoltaics, MoO X -based p -type contacts face fundamental limitations at hydrogenated amorphous silicon (i-a-Si:H)/MoO X interface, where oxygen vacancy defects lower work function, as well as, weak van der Waals-dominated interactions impair charge carry transport. To address these challenges, we introduced an ultrathin phosphomolybdic acid (PMA) interlayer at the i-a-Si:H/MoO X interface. PMA passivated oxygen vacancy defects, resulting in a notable improvement in open-circuit voltage from 713 to 730 mV, and 0.11 eV work function elevation via dipole formation; meanwhile, PMA strengthened the interfacial bonding energy, reducing saturation current density and contact resistance by 63% and 24%, respectively, contributing to a fill factor enhancement from 83.7% to 84.9%. In the end, we demonstrated a record efficiency of 24.9% for MoO X -based silicon solar cells, which provides valuable insights for developing high-performance MoO X HTL devices for dopant-free p -type contact technologies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. C. Ballif, F.-J. Haug, M. Boccard, P.J. Verlinden, G. Hahn, Status and perspectives of crystalline silicon photovoltaics in research and industry. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7(8), 597–616 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-022-00423-210.1038/s41578-022-00423-2 ↗
2. M.A. Green, The future of crystalline silicon solar cells. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 8(1), 127–139 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-159X(200001/02)8:1%3c127::AID-PIP311%3e3.0.CO;2-D10.1002/(SICI)1099-159X(200001/02)8:1<127::AID-PIP311>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
3. C. Battaglia, A. Cuevas, S. De Wolf, High-efficiency crystalline silicon solar cells: status and perspectives. Energy Environ. Sci. 9(5), 1552–1576 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ee03380b10.1039/c5ee03380b ↗
4. Z. Sun, X. Chen, Y. He, J. Li, J. Wang et al., Toward efficiency limits of crystalline silicon solar cells: recent progress in high-efficiency silicon heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 12(23), 2200015 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20220001510.1002/aenm.202200015 ↗
5. W. Li, Z. Xu, Y. Yan, J. Zhou, Q. Huang et al., Passivating contacts for crystalline silicon solar cells: an overview of the current advances and future perspectives. Adv. Energy Mater. 14(18), 2304338 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20230433810.1002/aenm.202304338 ↗
6. N.L. Chang, G.K. Poduval, B. Sang, K. Khoo, M. Woodhouse et al., Techno-economic analysis of the use of atomic layer deposited transition metal oxides in silicon heterojunction solar cells. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 31(4), 414–428 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.355310.1002/pip.3553 ↗
7. N.S. Nath, I. Bhattacharya, A.G. Tuck, D.I. Schlipalius, P.R. Ebert, Mechanisms of phosphine toxicity. J. Toxicol. 2011, 494168 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/49416810.1155/2011/494168 ↗
8. A.M. Monteiro, R.C. Flanagan, Process safety considerations for the use of 1 M borane tetrahydrofuran complex under general purpose plant conditions. Org. Process Res. Dev. 21(2), 241–246 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.oprd.6b0040710.1021/acs.oprd.6b00407 ↗
9. X. Qu, Y. He, M. Qu, T. Ruan, F. Chu et al., Identification of embedded nanotwins at c-Si/a-Si: H interface limiting the performance of high-efficiency silicon heterojunction solar cells. Nat. Energy 6(2), 194–202 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-00768-410.1038/s41560-020-00768-4 ↗
10. H. Li, B. Gao, L. Yang, S. Wang, K. Gao et al., Magnesium oxide buffer layer for over 32% efficiency four-terminal perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 15(48), 2501762 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20250176210.1002/aenm.202501762 ↗
11. K. Gao, D. Xu, J. Wang, Q. Bi, Z. Wu et al., Efficient silicon solar cells with aluminum-doped zinc oxide-based passivating contact. Adv. Funct. Mater. 35(4), 2415039 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20241503910.1002/adfm.202415039 ↗
12. W. Li, K. Gao, S. Wang, W. Shi, F. Cao et al., Sputtered tantalum oxynitride electron-selective contact for silicon solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 126(13), 133904 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.026984110.1063/5.0269841 ↗
13. K. Gao, Q. Bi, X. Wang, W. Liu, C. Xing et al., Progress and future prospects of wide-bandgap metal-compound-based passivating contacts for silicon solar cells. Adv. Mater. 34(26), 2200344 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20220034410.1002/adma.202200344 ↗
14. Y. Wang, S.-T. Zhang, L. Li, X. Yang, L. Lu et al., Dopant-free passivating contacts for crystalline silicon solar cells: progress and prospects. EcoMat 5(2), e12292 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/eom2.1229210.1002/eom2.12292 ↗
15. S. Cao, J. Li, J. Zhang, Y. Lin, L. Lu et al., Stable MoOX-based heterocontacts for p-type crystalline silicon solar cells achieving 20% efficiency. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(49), 2004367 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20200436710.1002/adfm.202004367 ↗
16. D. Scirè, P. Procel, A. Gulino, O. Isabella, M. Zeman et al., Sub-gap defect density characterization of molybdenum oxide: an annealing study for solar cell applications. Nano Res. 13(12), 3416–3424 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-020-3029-910.1007/s12274-020-3029-9 ↗
17. J. Meyer, S. Hamwi, M. Kröger, W. Kowalsky, T. Riedl et al., Transition metal oxides for organic electronics: energetics, device physics and applications. Adv. Mater. 24(40), 5408–5427 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20120163010.1002/adma.201201630 ↗
18. H. Jinno, T. Yokota, M. Koizumi, W. Yukita, M. Saito et al., Self-powered ultraflexible photonic skin for continuous bio-signal detection via air-operation-stable polymer light-emitting diodes. Nat. Commun. 12, 2234 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22558-610.1038/s41467-021-22558-6 ↗
19. M. Riahi, K. Yoshida, I.D.W. Samuel, Improving the air stability of flexible top-emitting organic light-emitting diodes. npj Flex. Electron. 8, 51 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41528-024-00338-810.1038/s41528-024-00338-8 ↗
20. Y. Zhang, Y. Zhan, G. Yuan, X. Chen, X. Lu et al., Record high external quantum efficiency of 20% achieved in fully solution-processed quantum dot light-emitting diodes based on hole-conductive metal oxides. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 660, 746–755 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2024.01.09910.1016/j.jcis.2024.01.099 ↗
21. L. Cao, P. Procel, A. Alcañiz, J. Yan, F. Tichelaar et al., Achieving 23.83% conversion efficiency in silicon heterojunction solar cell with ultra-thin MoOx hole collector layer via tailoring (i) a-Si: H/MoOx interface. Prog. Photovoltaics 31(12), 1245–1254 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.363810.1002/pip.3638 ↗
22. T.G. Allen, J. Bullock, X. Yang, A. Javey, S. De Wolf, Passivating contacts for crystalline silicon solar cells. Nat. Energy 4(11), 914–928 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0463-610.1038/s41560-019-0463-6 ↗
23. B.K. Mondal, S.K. Mostaque, M.A. Rashid, A. Kuddus, H. Shirai et al., Effect of CdS and In3Se4 BSF layers on the photovoltaic performance of PEDOT: PSS/n-Si solar cells: simulation based on experimental data. Superlattices Microstruct. 152, 106853 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2021.10685310.1016/j.spmi.2021.106853 ↗
24. Q. Yao, S. Li, L. Dong, P. Gu, X. Liu et al., Achieving tunable work function in MoO thin films: a key to low-cost, high-performance organic electronics. Thin Solid Films 817, 140659 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2025.14065910.1016/j.tsf.2025.140659 ↗
25. H. Cai, X. Yang, X. Xu, Q. Zeng, S. Zhou et al., Enhancing silicon compound heterojunction solar cells with vanadium-doped MoOX as hole transport layers. Adv. Sci. 12(28), 2505929 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20250592910.1002/advs.202505929 ↗
26. Q. Gao, Z. Xu, Y. Yan, W. Li, Y. Song et al., Efficient hole transport layers for silicon heterojunction solar cells by surface plasmonic modification in MoOx/Au NPs/MoOx stacks. Mater. Today Energy 45, 101681 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2024.10168110.1016/j.mtener.2024.101681 ↗
27. H. Lin, M. Yang, X. Ru, G. Wang, S. Yin et al., Silicon heterojunction solar cells with up to 26.81% efficiency achieved by electrically optimized nanocrystalline-silicon hole contact layers. Nat. Energy 8(8), 789–799 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-023-01255-210.1038/s41560-023-01255-2 ↗
28. J. Lv, Z. Li, R. Dong, Y. Xue, Y. Wang et al., Highly flame-retardant materials of different divalent metal ions alginate/silver phosphate: synthesis, characterizations, and synergistic phosphorus-polymetallic effects. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 247, 125834 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12583410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125834 ↗
29. L. Feng, Z. Li, Y. Liu, L. Hua, Z. Wei et al., Counterion engineering toward high-performance and pH-neutral polyoxometalates-based hole-transporting materials for efficient organic optoelectronic devices. ACS Nano 18(4), 3276–3285 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c0986510.1021/acsnano.3c09865 ↗
30. L.C. Palilis, M. Vasilopoulou, A.M. Douvas, D.G. Georgiadou, S. Kennou et al., Solution processable tungsten polyoxometalate as highly effective cathode interlayer for improved efficiency and stability polymer solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 114, 205–213 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2013.02.03410.1016/j.solmat.2013.02.034 ↗
31. G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6(1), 15–50 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
32. J. Neugebauer, T. Hickel, Density functional theory in materials science. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 3(5), 438–448 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.112510.1002/wcms.1125 ↗
33. G. Lippert, J. Hutter, M. Parrinello, A hybrid Gaussian and plane wave density functional scheme. Mol. Phys. 92(3), 477–487 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/0026897970948211910.1080/00268979709482119 ↗
34. J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77(18), 3865–3868 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.77.386510.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 ↗
35. S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, H. Krieg, A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132(15), 154104 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
36. W. Setyawan, S. Curtarolo, High-throughput electronic band structure calculations: challenges and tools. Comput. Mater. Sci. 49(2), 299–312 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.01010.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.010 ↗
37. A. Kumar, M. Dutta, S. Tomer, P. Rao, Vandana et al., Tuning of structural and optical properties of reactively sputtered MoOx films. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 35(8), 612 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-024-12324-x10.1007/s10854-024-12324-x ↗
38. W. Lu, X. Yang, Q. Kang, J. Li, Z. Zhou et al., Patterning design for edge passivation in compound crystalline silicon solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 36(11), e14833 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20251483310.1002/adfm.202514833 ↗
39. J. Dréon, Q. Jeangros, J. Cattin, J. Haschke, L. Antognini et al., 23.5%-efficient silicon heterojunction silicon solar cell using molybdenum oxide as hole-selective contact. Nano Energy 70, 104495 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10449510.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104495 ↗
40. J. Li, Q. Kang, Y. Wang, Z. Zhou, Z. Sun et al., Low oxygen content MoOx and SiOx tunnel layer based heterocontacts for efficient and stable crystalline silicon solar cells approaching 22% efficiency. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34(6), 2310619 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20231061910.1002/adfm.202310619 ↗
41. W. Lu, Q. Kang, J. Li, X. Xu, D. Yuan et al., MoOx/Au/MoOx-based composite heterocontacts for crystalline silicon solar cells achieving 22.0% efficiency. Small Struct. 6(7), 2400559 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/sstr.20240055910.1002/sstr.202400559 ↗
42. L. Li, G. Du, Y. Lin, X. Zhou, Z. Gu et al., NiOx/MoOx bilayer as an efficient hole-selective contact in crystalline silicon solar cells. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2(12), 100684 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.10068410.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100684 ↗
43. S. Chowdhury, M.Q. Khokhar, D.P. Pham, J. Yi, Al2O3/MoOx hole-selective passivating contact for silicon heterojunction solar cell. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 11(1), 015004 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1149/2162-8777/ac4d8310.1149/2162-8777/ac4d83 ↗
44. J. Klein, L. Kampermann, B. Mockenhaupt, M. Behrens, J. Strunk et al., Limitations of the Tauc plot method. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33(47), 2304523 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20230452310.1002/adfm.202304523 ↗
45. S. Erfanifam, S.M. Mohseni, L. Jamilpanah, M. Mohammadbeigi, P. Sangpour et al., Tunable bandgap and spin-orbit coupling by composition control of MoS2 and MoOx (x=2 and 3) thin film compounds. Mater. Des. 122, 220–225 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.08510.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.085 ↗
46. H. Nasser, M.Z. Borra, E.H. Çiftpınar, B. Eldeeb, R. Turan, Fourteen percent efficiency ultrathin silicon solar cells with improved infrared light management enabled by hole-selective transition metal oxide full-area rear passivating contacts. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 30(8), 823–834 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.351010.1002/pip.3510 ↗
47. H. Nasser, F. Es, M. Zolfaghari Borra, E. Semiz, G. Kökbudak et al., On the application of hole-selective MoOx as full-area rear contact for industrial scale p-type c-Si solar cells. Prog. Photovoltaics 29(3), 281–293 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.336310.1002/pip.3363 ↗
48. S. Zhong, J. Dreon, Q. Jeangros, E. Aydin, S. De Wolf et al., Mitigating plasmonic absorption losses at rear electrodes in high-efficiency silicon solar cells using dopant-free contact stacks. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(5), 1907840 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20190784010.1002/adfm.201907840 ↗
49. Z.C. Holman, M. Filipič, B. Lipovšek, S. De Wolf, F. Smole et al., Parasitic absorption in the rear reflector of a silicon solar cell: simulation and measurement of the sub-bandgap reflectance for common dielectric/metal reflectors. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 120, 426–430 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2013.06.02410.1016/j.solmat.2013.06.024 ↗
50. Z. Liu, H. Lin, Z. Wang, L. Chen, T. Wu et al., Dual functional dopant-free contacts with titanium protecting layer: boosting stability while balancing electron transport and recombination losses. Adv. Sci. 9(23), 2202240 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20220224010.1002/advs.202202240 ↗
51. D. Kiermasch, L. Gil-Escrig, H.J. Bolink, K. Tvingstedt, Effects of masking on open-circuit voltage and fill factor in solar cells. Joule 3(1), 16–26 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.10.01610.1016/j.joule.2018.10.016 ↗
52. H. Lin, G. Wang, Q. Su, C. Han, C. Xue et al., Unveiling the mechanism of attaining high fill factor in silicon solar cells. Prog. Photovoltaics 32(6), 359–371 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.377510.1002/pip.3775 ↗
53. F. Khan, S.-H. Baek, J.H. Kim, Intensity dependency of photovoltaic cell parameters under high illumination conditions: an analysis. Appl. Energy 133(C), 356–362 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.10710.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.107 ↗
54. R.H. Sardar, A. Bera, S. Chattopadhyay, S.I. Ali, S. Pramanik et al., The impact of series (Rs) and shunt resistances (Rsh) on solar cell parameters to enhance the photovoltaic performance of f-PSCs. Opt. Mater. 155, 115818 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2024.11581810.1016/j.optmat.2024.115818 ↗
55. G. Wang, M. Yu, H. Wu, Y. Li, L. Xie et al., Silicon solar cells with hybrid back contacts. Nature 647(8089), 369–374 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09681-w10.1038/s41586-025-09681-w ↗
56. L. Chen, H. Lin, Z. Liu, T. Wu, Y. Pang et al., Realization of a general method for extracting specific contact resistance of silicon-based dopant-free heterojunctions. Solar RRL 6(2), 2100394 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.20210039410.1002/solr.202100394 ↗
57. M. Vaqueiro-Contreras, C. Bartlam, R.S. Bonilla, V.P. Markevich, M.P. Halsall et al., Graphene oxide films for field effect surface passivation of silicon for solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 187, 189–193 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2018.08.00210.1016/j.solmat.2018.08.002 ↗
58. J. Wu, Z. Ying, X. Li, M. Zhang, X. Guo et al., Surface sulfuration of atomic layer deposited SnOx for enhanced performance of n–i–P perovskite solar cells. Solar RRL 9(7), 2400879 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.20240087910.1002/solr.202400879 ↗
59. L. Li, G. Du, X. Zhou, Y. Lin, Y. Jiang et al., Interfacial engineering of Cu2O passivating contact for efficient crystalline silicon solar cells with an Al2O3 passivation layer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13(24), 28415–28423 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c0825810.1021/acsami.1c08258 ↗
60. R. Zhang, B. Ma, Y. Cui, C. Tan, B. Chen et al., Designing MoOx/Ag/MoOx sandwich structured buffer layer for four-terminal CsPbI3/TOPCon tandem minimodules. Mater. Futur. 4(4), 045103 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5724/ae0c7610.1088/2752-5724/ae0c76 ↗