DataVXJournal of Materials Science: Materials in ElectronicsPaper
journal article·2025-09

Exploring the influence of erbium doping on the optoelectronic properties of ZnO thin films

Ghazi Aman Nowsherwan, Muhammad Azhar, Aurang Zaib, Mohsin Khan, Umar Farooq Ali, Saira Riaz, Shahzad Naseem

Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics· Volume 36· Issue 26
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

Electronic materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. G. Galli, Nature 436, 32 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/436032a10.1038/436032a ↗
2. S. Pearton et al., J. Appl. Phys. 93, 1 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.152314610.1063/1.1523146 ↗
3. K. Ando, in Magneto-Optics (eds. S. Sugano, N. Kojima) 211 (Springer, 2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04170-9_910.1007/978-3-662-04170-9_9 ↗
4. J. Xu, Luminescence in ZnO (2004).
5. S. Shukla, D.K. Sharma, Mater. Today: Proc. 34, 793 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.116710.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.1167 ↗
6. D.R. Miller et al., Sens. Actuators B Chem. 204, 250 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.07.07410.1016/j.snb.2014.07.074 ↗
7. J. Lang et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 9574 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.06.07310.1016/j.apsusc.2011.06.073 ↗
8. M. Lahmer, Appl. Surf. Sci. 457, 315 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.26310.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.263 ↗
9. R. John, R. Rajakumari, Nano-Micro Lett. 4, 65 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0335370410.1007/BF03353704 ↗
10. V. Kumar et al., Opt. Mater. 46, 510 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2015.04.04410.1016/j.optmat.2015.04.044 ↗
11. A. Kumawat et al., Mater. Technol. 37, 1595 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2022.203573810.1080/10667857.2022.2035738 ↗
12. S.S. Pitale et al., J. Appl. Phys. 109, 013101 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.352564210.1063/1.3525642 ↗
13. J. Yang et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 255, 2646 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.07.20110.1016/j.apsusc.2008.07.201 ↗
14. M. Saif et al., Chemosphere 90, 840 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.09510.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.095 ↗
15. P.C. Sousa Filho, O.A. Serra, Quím. Nova 37, 753 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5935/0100-4042.2014015010.5935/0100-4042.20140150 ↗
16. W. Yuhua et al., J. Rare Earths 33, 1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0721(14)60377-210.1016/S1002-0721(14)60377-2 ↗
17. N. Kobelev et al., Solid State Phenom. 115, 113 (2006). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.115.11310.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.115.113 ↗
18. G.C. Tyrrell, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 546, 180 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2005.03.08510.1016/j.nima.2005.03.085 ↗
19. V. Pawade et al., Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 52, 596 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.11010.1016/j.rser.2015.07.110 ↗
20. M. Lluscà et al., J. Lumin. 185, 112 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2016.12.04710.1016/j.jlumin.2016.12.047 ↗
21. E. Asikuzun et al., J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 28, 14314 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-7296-510.1007/s10854-017-7296-5 ↗
22. M. Achehboune et al., J. Lumin. 246, 118843 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2022.11884310.1016/j.jlumin.2022.118843 ↗
23. Ö. Öztürk et al., Politeknik Dergisi 2022, 1 (2022)
24. T.K. Pathak et al., J. Mod. Opt. 62, 1368 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2015.102172310.1080/09500340.2015.1021723 ↗
25. D.K. Sharma et al., J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 29, 3840 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-8325-010.1007/s10854-017-8325-0 ↗
26. E. Asikuzun Tokeser et al., J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 34, 135 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-022-09431-y10.1007/s10854-022-09431-y ↗
27. S. Thanikaikarasan et al., J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 24, 955 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2020.10.00510.1016/j.jscs.2020.10.005 ↗
28. B.D. Cullity, R. Smoluchowski, Phys. Today 10(3), 50 (1957)10.1063/1.3060306 ↗
29. R.D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr. A 32, 751 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1107/S056773947600155110.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
30. R. Bayati et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 22316 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/am506260k10.1021/am506260k ↗
31. M. Angelo et al., Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 15, 93 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.71110.1002/pip.711 ↗
32. D. Mahadik et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 104104 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.363539910.1063/1.3635399 ↗
33. P. Chi et al., RSC Adv. 5, 96705 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA18827H10.1039/C5RA18827H ↗
34. C.-H. Chao et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 8210 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0019510.1021/acs.jpcc.6b00195 ↗
35. C.-Y. Tsay, W.-T. Hsu, Ceram. Int. 39, 7425 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.02.08610.1016/j.ceramint.2013.02.086 ↗
36. H. Shahbazi et al., J. Alloys Compd. 785, 260 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.22210.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.222 ↗
37. X. Li et al., Ceram. Int. 44, 1362 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.10.09710.1016/j.ceramint.2017.10.097 ↗
38. J. Tauc, Amorphous and Liquid Semiconductors (Springer, 2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8705-710.1007/978-1-4615-8705-7 ↗
39. E. Burstein, Phys. Rev. 93, 632 (1954). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.93.63210.1103/PhysRev.93.632 ↗
40. W. Paul, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 10, 345 (1959)10.1016/0022-3697(59)90017-4 ↗
41. R. Chandramohan et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. B 176, 152 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2010.11.01410.1016/j.mseb.2010.11.014 ↗
42. Y. Hu et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 254, 3873 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.12.00410.1016/j.apsusc.2007.12.004 ↗
43. L. Li et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 8460 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp901331v10.1021/jp901331v ↗
44. A. Djurišić et al., Nanotechnology 18, 095702 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/18/9/09570210.1088/0957-4484/18/9/095702 ↗
45. J. Geng et al., J. Nanomater. 2012, 317857 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/31785710.1155/2012/317857 ↗
46. R.S. Zeferino et al., J. Appl. Phys. 109, 014308 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.352559210.1063/1.3525592 ↗
47. E. Kolobkova et al., Opt. Mater. Express 9, 3666 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.9.00366610.1364/OME.9.003666 ↗
48. B. Jin et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 169, 521 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4332(00)00743-510.1016/S0169-4332(00)00743-5 ↗
49. X. Liu et al., J. Appl. Phys. 95, 3141 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.164644010.1063/1.1646440 ↗
50. R. Raji, K. Gopchandran, J. Sci.: Adv. Mater. Devices 2, 51 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2017.02.00110.1016/j.jsamd.2017.02.001 ↗
51. A. Achour et al., Nanomaterials 9, 794 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano905079410.3390/nano9050794 ↗
52. L.J. van der Pauw, Philips Tech. Rev. 20, 220 (1958)
53. I. Winer et al., J. Mater. Res. 26, 1309 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2011.10110.1557/jmr.2011.101 ↗
54. F. Azad et al., Ceram. Int. 49, 41071 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.03.21410.1016/j.ceramint.2023.03.214 ↗
55. D. Aryanto et al., J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 817, 012034 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/817/1/01203410.1088/1742-6596/817/1/012034 ↗