journal article·2025-07-01

Influence of structural parameters on pyroshock protection performance of thin-walled circular tube—A study based on coupling calculation and orthogonal test

Xinggan Lu, Shenshen Cheng, Kun Jiang, Tianyi Ma, Shaona Liu

AIP Advances· Volume 15· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

The prediction and protection of pyroshock are the focal issue in aerospace research. Historically, numerical approaches decoupled load acquisition from the system structural response, lacking comprehensive coupled calculations. This study develops a multi-physics coupling model integrating energetic material combustion, structural response, and transient heat exchange. Utilizing ABAQUS and its user subroutine, the lumped parameter method predicts impact load and flow field generated by energetic material combustion, while the finite element method simulates the pyroshock process and system structural response, addressing gas-solid heat transfer. A pyroshock experimental platform is built, and the accuracy of the coupling model is verified by comparing with the experimental results and classical case. Based on the coupling calculation results, the fluid-solid-thermal coupling in the pyroshock process is discussed. Then, an orthogonal test is designed to analyze the influence of structural parameters on the protection performance of thin-walled circular tube energy absorber. The results show that the multi-physics coupling model can capture the characteristic parameters of flow field, structure field, and temperature field, and effectively improve the calculation accuracy. Among the structural parameters of a thin-walled circular tube, the wall thickness has the most important influence, and its optimal value can improve the protective performance by realizing complete collapse and forming a multi-layer folding structure. In addition, both wall thickness and free travel show high significance, with reduced free travel contributing to lower impact velocity, overload, and improved output performance of the pyrotechnic device. This work offers an efficient approach for exploring the coupling effects of multiple physical fields in prediction and protection of pyroshock and provides valuable insights for optimizing the protection performance of thin-walled circular tubes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Affiliations

School of Energy and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology 1 , Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu,

Xi’an Modern Control Technology Research Institute 2 , Xian 710065 Shanxi,

School of Automotive Engineering, Yancheng Institute of Technology 3 , Yancheng 224007, Jiangsu,

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Study on buffering performance of thin-walled metal tube with different angles10.1016/j.dt.2018.06.008 ↗
2. Collapsible impact energy absorbers: An overview10.1016/s0263-8231(00)00048-3 ↗
3. Rotational stiffness of drum deployed thin-walled open tubular booms10.1016/j.tws.2020.106704 ↗
4. Experimental study on the compression mechanical behaviour of steel pipes with mechanically induced pitting corrosion10.1016/j.apor.2021.102880 ↗
5. Study on shear capacity of connections with external stiffening rings between square steel tubular columns and steel beams10.1177/1369433220956832 ↗
6. A multi-objective optimization of energy absorption properties of thin-walled circular tube with combined bar extrusion under quasi-static axial loading: Experiments and numerical simulation10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105691 ↗
7. Static crushing of aluminium tubes filled with PET foam and a GFRP skeleton. Numerical modelling and multiobjective optimization10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.07.004 ↗
8. Axial crushing of multicorner sheet metal columns10.1115/1.3176030 ↗
9. Controlling the axial crushing of circular metal tubes using an expanding rigid ring press fitted on top of the structure10.1080/13588260903209099 ↗
10. Investigation of deformation and collapse mechanism for magnesium tube in axial crushing test10.1007/s12206-013-0803-6 ↗
11. 2019
12. Crashworthiness study of circular tubes subjected to radial extrusion under quasi-static loading10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106128 ↗
13. On pyroshock tests for aerospace equipment qualification: A comprehensive parametric model for the simulation and the design of pyroshock test facilities10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104697 ↗
14. Design and characterization of a pyroshock reduction structure based on local resonance mechanisms10.1016/j.ast.2024.109262 ↗
15. Mitigation of the blast load effects on a building structure using newly composite structural configurations10.1016/j.dt.2020.03.002 ↗
16. On the Jones–Wilkins–Lee equation of state for high explosive products10.1002/prep.202300223 ↗
17. Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation of the motion of RDX deflagration-driven flyer plate based on laser-initiated micro-pyrotechnic devices10.3390/mi14050917 ↗
18. Finite element modeling and pyroshock response analysis of separation nuts10.1016/j.ast.2017.05.028 ↗
19. Influence of multiple structural parameters on buffer performance of a thin-walled circular tube based on the coupling modeling technique10.1002/msd2.12060 ↗
20. A coupled computational framework for the transient heat transfer in the typical pyrotechnic device10.1063/5.0141723 ↗
21. Multiphase reactive flow and heat transfer simulations in the unlocking components of an ultra-low shock pyrotechnic separation nut10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.123141 ↗
22. Experimental model design and preliminary numerical verification of fluid-thermal-structural coupling problem10.2514/1.j056398 ↗
23. Validation of an improved contact method for multi-material Eulerian hydrocodes in three-dimensions10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103444 ↗
24. A feasible method for modeling and analyzing the pyroshock source of spacecraf
25. 2004
26. 1997 · 3103
27. Prediction and isolation of pyroshock in typical pyrotechnic device based on coupled modeling technique10.1016/j.tws.2022.109393 ↗
28. Thermo-mechanical analysis of double base propellant combustion in a barrel10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.04.062 ↗