Modeling of Electrical Characteristics of Degraded Polymer Light‐Emitting Diodes
Source abstract
Abstract
Degradation of a polymer light‐emitting diode (PLED) driven under constant current is characterized by an increase of driving voltage and a decrease of luminance and efficiency. Possible causes for degradation can be a decrease of charge‐carrier mobility, a reduced charge injection by the electrodes, or the formation of charge traps. In order to disentangle these processes, numerical simulations are performed on the device characteristics of pristine and degraded PLEDs. The observed reduction in transport and luminous efficiency under current stress is simultaneously explained by the formation of hole traps. A reduction of the hole transport upon degradation is verified by transient electroluminescence measurements.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research 55128 Mainz Germany
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20130339310.1002/adma.201303393 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.36956410.1063/1.369564 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.181021310.1063/1.1810213 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0379-6779(98)00031-910.1016/S0379-6779(98)00031-9 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.74410.1103/PhysRevLett.73.744 ↗
6. 10.1021/ja00146a00410.1021/ja00146a004 ↗
7. Cumpston B. · Trends Polym. Sci. · 1996 · 5 · 151
8. 10.1063/1.36109610.1063/1.361096 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.36549310.1063/1.365493 ↗
10. 10.1098/rsta.1997.003610.1098/rsta.1997.0036 ↗
11. 10.1117/12.85371410.1117/12.853714 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.361038110.1063/1.3610381 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.mseb.2014.10.01410.1016/j.mseb.2014.10.014 ↗
14. 10.1021/am507262810.1021/am5072628 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.381910.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3819 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.06660510.1103/PhysRevLett.107.066605 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.25680510.1103/PhysRevLett.107.256805 ↗
18. Langevin P. · Ann. Chim. Phys. · 1903 · 28 · 443
19. 10.1103/PhysRev.87.83510.1103/PhysRev.87.835 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.20660110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.206601 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.08520510.1103/PhysRevB.72.085205 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.08520110.1103/PhysRevB.81.085201 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.19320210.1103/PhysRevB.75.193202 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.19520410.1103/PhysRevB.83.195204 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.orgel.2012.02.00910.1016/j.orgel.2012.02.009 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.04521710.1103/PhysRevB.72.045217 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20090262410.1002/adma.200902624 ↗
28. 10.1002/1521-4095(20020205)14:3<206::AID-ADMA206>3.0.CO;2-J10.1002/1521-4095(20020205)14:3<206::AID-ADMA206>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
29. 10.1016/0379-6779(96)03660-010.1016/0379-6779(96)03660-0 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.165870510.1063/1.1658705 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.5b1179110.1021/acsami.5b11791 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.282044810.1063/1.2820448 ↗