journal article·2018

Insights into Grain Boundary in Lithium-Rich Anti-Perovskite as Solid Electrolytes

Bingbing Chen, Chaoqun Xu, Jianqiu Zhou

Publisher page

Abstract

In all-solid-state lithium batteries, anti-perovskite solid electrolyte has high ionic conductivity and high stability with lithium metal anode. However, grain boundaries (GBs) contribute to undesirable resistance limiting ionic conductivity in anti-perovskite, and there is limited knowledge about the GBs in solid electrolyte, particularly at the atomic scale. Here, using density functional theory calculations we show that four symmetric tilt (Σ3 and Σ5) GBs effects on structural characteristics and ions transport in anti-perovskite (Li 3 OCl) solid electrolyte. Using first-principles simulation, GBs are found to be relatively stable resulting in its high concentrations in Li 3 OCl. Interestingly, the presence of GBs can improve compatibility with electrode, while it decreases the ionic conductivity and band gaps in Li 3 OCl. Furthermore, it is noted that the Σ5 GBs structures are softer and higher ionic conductivity than Σ3 GBs, delivering a new insight that GBs types may importantly affect the softness and ionic conductivity in solid electrolyte. Significantly, we find that the easiest Li ion migration pathway is along GB direction in Li 3 OCl with GBs structures. The present work uncovers the GBs behaviors in anti-perovskite solid electrolyte, which can help us to guide the design of high performance anti-perovskite solid electrolyte.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.3010.1038/nenergy.2016.30 ↗
2. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.10310.1038/natrevmats.2016.103 ↗
3. 10.1149/2.0021514jes10.1149/2.0021514jes ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0056310.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00563 ↗
5. 10.1002/anie.20160892410.1002/anie.201608924 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.02810.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.028 ↗
7. 10.1038/nmat436910.1038/nmat4369 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ssi.2016.08.01410.1016/j.ssi.2016.08.014 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat306610.1038/nmat3066 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0061010.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00610 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.00310.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.05.003 ↗
12. 10.1021/ja309143810.1021/ja3091438 ↗
13. 10.1021/ja305709z10.1021/ja305709z ↗
14. 10.1039/C5CC01109D10.1039/C5CC01109D ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.7b1168710.1021/acsami.7b11687 ↗
16. 10.1039/C4CC05372A10.1039/C4CC05372A ↗
17. 10.1149/2.0091610jes10.1149/2.0091610jes ↗
18. 10.1039/C7TA08780B10.1039/C7TA08780B ↗
19. 10.1002/advs.20150035910.1002/advs.201500359 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.496243710.1063/1.4962437 ↗
21. 10.1021/cm503717e10.1021/cm503717e ↗
22. 10.1039/C5CP05722A10.1039/C5CP05722A ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0065910.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00659 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.03.07310.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.03.073 ↗
25. 10.1039/C4CC05372A10.1039/C4CC05372A ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ssi.2015.11.02710.1016/j.ssi.2015.11.027 ↗
27. 10.1021/jacs.7b1059310.1021/jacs.7b10593 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.47293310.1063/1.472933 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.132322410.1063/1.1323224 ↗
32. 10.1002/adma.20120280510.1002/adma.201202805 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.6b0675410.1021/acsami.6b06754 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.06.04110.1016/j.commatsci.2018.06.041 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.6b0661210.1021/acsami.6b06612 ↗
36. 10.1149/2.0061602jes10.1149/2.0061602jes ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.13430310.1103/PhysRevB.87.134303 ↗