journal article·2016Open access

Understanding Transport at the Acid-Alkaline Interface of Bipolar Membranes

Kyle N. Grew, Joshua P. McClure, Deryn Chu, Paul A. Kohl, John M. Ahlfield

Abstract

The combination of cation exchange membrane (CEM) and anion exchange membrane (AEM) electrolytes to form of a hybrid, or bipolar membrane (BPM) electrolyte, can have unique advantages for electrochemical systems including fuel cells, electrolyzers, electrodialysis, and photovoltaic solar-to-fuel devices. However, a major challenge for this approach is the development of a stable and active interfacial region (i.e., junction) that adjoins the CEM and AEM layers. Moreover, a fundamental understanding of transport at the CEM-AEM junction is lacking. Therefore, the present study focuses on the theoretical development and analysis of the nature of the BPM interface. A Poisson-Nernst-Planck (PNP) theory is formalized and applied to a representative BPM interface. The findings are reported in terms of bias (i.e., overpotential) in a galvanic device with respect to CEM and AEM material requirements. Specific attention is paid to our interests in the application of the BPM to a fuel cell device with an acidic (CEM) anode and alkaline (AEM) cathode. We demonstrate that a BPM with an acidic CEM anode and alkaline AEM cathode must promote a trap-assisted type of recombination mechanism under forward bias. Without such a mechanism, large overpotentials are needed to drive ionic recombination processes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced battery technologies research · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Marcinkoski J. Spendelow J. Wilson A. Papageorgopoulos D. , “Fuel Cell System Cost - 2015,” U.S. Department of Energy (2015).
2. Spendelow J. Papageorgopoulos D. , “Platinum Gorup Metal Loading in PEMFC Stacks,” U.S. Department of Energy (2011).
3. 10.1002/fuce.20040004510.1002/fuce.200400045 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.04310.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.043 ↗
5. 10.1002/polb.2339510.1002/polb.23395 ↗
6. 10.1039/C4EE01303D10.1039/C4EE01303D ↗
7. 10.1149/2.075111jes10.1149/2.075111jes ↗
8. 10.1149/2.0151506jes10.1149/2.0151506jes ↗
9. 10.1149/1.348310610.1149/1.3483106 ↗
10. 10.1002/fuce.20090012210.1002/fuce.200900122 ↗
11. 10.1149/1.346870010.1149/1.3468700 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.169916510.1063/1.1699165 ↗
13. 10.1021/j150575a03010.1021/j150575a030 ↗
14. 10.1149/1.206915810.1149/1.2069158 ↗
15. 10.1021/jp981488h10.1021/jp981488h ↗
16. 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.09.03410.1016/j.memsci.2010.09.034 ↗
17. 10.1021/ja072449z10.1021/ja072449z ↗
18. 10.1021/cm00011a02010.1021/cm00011a020 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0006-3495(62)86848-910.1016/S0006-3495(62)86848-9 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.231.4733.2510.1126/science.231.4733.25 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)81360-510.1016/S0376-7388(00)81360-5 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevA.42.624510.1103/PhysRevA.42.6245 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0006-3495(65)86745-510.1016/S0006-3495(65)86745-5 ↗
24. 10.1039/c3cp52150h10.1039/c3cp52150h ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.08.10410.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.08.104 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.01330210.1103/PhysRevE.90.013302 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cis.2009.10.00110.1016/j.cis.2009.10.001 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.04510.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.045 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp903252u10.1021/jp903252u ↗
30. Bard A. Fauklner L. , Electrochemical Methods Fundamentals and Applicaitons, 2’nd Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., (2001).
31. Helfferich F. , Ion Exchange, New York: McGraw-Hil Book Co., Inc. (1962).
32. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.04.02210.1016/j.memsci.2013.04.022 ↗
33. 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1949.tb03645.x10.1002/j.1538-7305.1949.tb03645.x ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRev.87.83510.1103/PhysRev.87.835 ↗
35. 10.1109/JRPROC.1957.27852810.1109/JRPROC.1957.278528 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.02150210.1103/PhysRevE.75.021502 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.02150310.1103/PhysRevE.75.021503 ↗
38. 10.1149/1.302103510.1149/1.3021035 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.03.07310.1016/j.electacta.2009.03.073 ↗
40. 10.1149/1.336872810.1149/1.3368728 ↗
41. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/42/42410610.1088/0953-8984/21/42/424106 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.354991510.1063/1.3549915 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.cocis.2011.04.01210.1016/j.cocis.2011.04.012 ↗
44. 10.1209/0295-5075/79/4800210.1209/0295-5075/79/48002 ↗
45. 10.1149/2.011112esl10.1149/2.011112esl ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.04410.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.044 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.03.01210.1016/j.memsci.2016.03.012 ↗
48. 10.1021/j100652a01710.1021/j100652a017 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.25680510.1103/PhysRevLett.107.256805 ↗
50. 10.1063/1.174954110.1063/1.1749541 ↗
51. 10.1038/nmat372910.1038/nmat3729 ↗
52. 10.1016/S0009-2614(98)00877-X10.1016/S0009-2614(98)00877-X ↗
53. 10.1002/actp.1997.01048070210.1002/actp.1997.010480702 ↗
54. 10.1063/1.174823310.1063/1.1748233 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.01710.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.017 ↗