journal article·2013-10

The electromechanics of piezoresponse force microscopy for a transversely isotropic piezoelectric medium

K. Pan, Y.Y. Liu, S.H. Xie, Y.M. Liu, J.Y. Li

Acta Materialia· Volume 61· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM) has emerged as one of the most powerful tools for characterizing and manipulating electromechanical responses of piezoelectric and ferroelectric materials at the nanoscale, yet the interpretation and quantitative analysis of PFM data remains difficult and is not well established. In this paper, we develop a rigorous analysis of PFM using the Hankel integral transform and the effective point charge model, which accounts for the electromechanical coupling of the transversely isotropic piezoelectric medium, the concentrated electric field induced by scanning probe microscopy tip, and the coupling of the electromechanical field at the interface of air and piezoelectric half-space. Using this method, the contact mode is first considered in comparison with the decoupled method, followed by a detailed analysis of the non-contact mode considering the effects of experimental conditions. We note that the decoupled method is only valid for materials with weak piezoelectricity, and the effective piezoelectric coefficient derived from PFM shows nonlinear dependence on the complete set of specimen electromechanical moduli, as well as on the experimental conditions. The analysis thus sheds considerable insight into PFM and could enable determination of intrinsic piezoelectric coefficients through PFM measurement using inverse calculations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Berlincourt · Phys Rev · 1963 · 129 · 100910.1103/PhysRev.129.1009 ↗
2. Furukawa · Nature · 1969 · 221 · 123510.1038/2211235a0 ↗
3. Horiuchi · Nature · 2010 · 463 · 78910.1038/nature08731 ↗
4. Fu · Science · 2013 · 339 · 42510.1126/science.1229675 ↗
5. Sarles · Smart Mater Struct · 2011 · 20 · 09401810.1088/0964-1726/20/9/094018 ↗
6. Liu · Phys Rev Lett · 2013 · 110 · 16810110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.168101 ↗
7. Kalinin · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2007 · 37 · 18910.1146/annurev.matsci.37.052506.084323 ↗
8. Liu · Phys Rev Lett · 2012 · 108 · 07810310.1103/PhysRevLett.108.078103 ↗
9. Gruverman · J Mater Sci · 2006 · 41 · 10710.1007/s10853-005-5946-0 ↗
10. Bonnell · MRS Bull · 2009 · 34 · 64810.1557/mrs2009.176 ↗
11. Kalinin · Phys Rev B · 2004 · 70 · 18410110.1103/PhysRevB.70.184101 ↗
12. Pan · J Appl Phys · 2012 · 112 · 05201610.1063/1.4746034 ↗
13. Dunn · Int J Solids Struct · 1996 · 33 · 457110.1016/0020-7683(95)00282-0 ↗
14. Ding · Int J Solids Struct · 1996 · 33 · 228310.1016/0020-7683(95)00152-2 ↗
15. Chen · Mech Res Commun · 1993 · 20 · 27110.1016/0093-6413(93)90069-Z ↗
16. Pan · Int J Solids Struct · 2000 · 37 · 94310.1016/S0020-7683(99)00073-6 ↗
17. Dunn · J Appl Mech · 1999 · 66 · 67510.1115/1.2791548 ↗
18. Ding · Sci China Ser E · 1998 · 41 · 7010.1007/BF02916874 ↗
19. Gao · Acta Mech · 2004 · 172 · 16910.1007/s00707-004-0153-7 ↗
20. Pan · J Eng Math · 2004 · 49 · 27110.1023/B:ENGI.0000031183.83519.19 ↗
21. Matysiak · Bull Pol Acad Sci Technol · 1985 · 33 · 25
22. Giannakopoulos · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 215310.1016/S1359-6454(99)00076-2 ↗
23. Wang · J Mech Phys Solids · 2008 · 56 · 333110.1016/j.jmps.2008.09.009 ↗
24. Wu · Int J Solids Struct · 2012 · 49 · 9510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2011.09.014 ↗
25. Chen · Acta Mech Solida Sin · 1999 · 12 · 114
26. Karapetian · Phil Mag · 2005 · 85 · 101710.1080/14786430412331324680 ↗
27. Tian · J Appl Phys · 2008 · 104 · 07411010.1063/1.2979973 ↗
28. Morozovska · J Appl Phys · 2011 · 110 · 05201110.1063/1.3623763 ↗
29. Ganpule · Appl Phys Lett · 2000 · 77 · 29210.1063/1.126954 ↗
30. Agronin · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 97 · 08431210.1063/1.1861515 ↗
31. Felten · J Appl Phys · 2004 · 96 · 56310.1063/1.1758316 ↗
32. Gruverman · Nanotechnology · 1997 · 8 · A3810.1088/0957-4484/8/3A/008 ↗
33. Bdikin · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 92 · 18290910.1063/1.2919792 ↗
34. Wicks · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 6710.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.057 ↗
35. Morozovska · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 75 · 17410910.1103/PhysRevB.75.174109 ↗
36. Pan · J Appl Phys · 2013 · 113 · 18722310.1063/1.4801970 ↗
37. Kalinin · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 76 · 21210210.1103/PhysRevB.76.212102 ↗
38. Chen · J Mech Phys Solids · 2010 · 58 · 152410.1016/j.jmps.2010.07.012 ↗
39. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 2011 · 99 · 17191310.1063/1.3657143 ↗
40. Morozovska · Appl Phys Lett · 2006 · 89 · 19290110.1063/1.2378526 ↗
41. Chen · Compos Sci Technol · 2005 · 65 · 137210.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.007 ↗
42. Mele · Am J Phys · 2001 · 69 · 55710.1119/1.1341252 ↗
43. Berlincourt · Proc IRE · 1960 · 48 · 22010.1109/JRPROC.1960.287467 ↗
44. Eliseev · J Appl Phys · 2007 · 102 · 01410910.1063/1.2749463 ↗
45. Liu · Nanoscale · 2012 · 4 · 317510.1039/c2nr00039c ↗