journal article·2012-04

Mobility-limiting mechanisms in polar semiconductor heterostructures

Saurabh Pandey, Daniela Cavalcoli, Albert Minj, Beatrice Fraboni, Anna Cavallini, Daria Skuridina, Patrick Vogt, Michael Kneissl

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 6-7
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The mechanisms controlling the carrier mobility of two-dimensional electron gases (2DEGs) in ultrathin polar semiconductor heterostructures, such as III–V nitrides, have been analyzed. In x Al 1− x N/AlN/GaN heterostructures with different AlN layer thicknesses have been investigated. These structures can be considered a very good benchmark for the analyses of III–V nitrides, due to the possibility of modulating the strain by varying the In composition. In order to determine an estimate of the mobility, charged dislocation and remote surface roughness scattering lifetimes have been calculated. Atomic force microscopy and scanning tunneling microscopy analyses have been used to measure the parameters required for the lifetime calculation, such as surface roughness, correlation length and dislocation density, and the total mobility has thus been calculated without the need of any a priori assumptions on the values of these parameters. The mobility of In x Al 1− x N/AlN/GaN heterostructures has been measured at room temperature and liquid nitrogen temperature by the Hall effect. A comparison between the calculated and the Hall-effect-measured mobilities allowed us to establish, without using any ad hoc assumptions or fitting parameters, that the remote surface roughness is the most effective factor in controlling the transport properties of 2DEGs in nitride-based heterostructures at low temperature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Semiconductor materials and devices · Ga2O3 and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Bernardini · Phys Rev B · 1997 · 56 · R1002410.1103/PhysRevB.56.R10024 ↗
2. Gonschorek · Appl Phys Lett · 2006 · 89 · 06210610.1063/1.2335390 ↗
3. Gaska · Appl Phys Lett · 1999 · 74 · 28710.1063/1.123001 ↗
4. Ambacher · J Appl Phys · 1999 · 85 · 322210.1063/1.369664 ↗
5. Miyoshi · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 85 · 171010.1063/1.1790073 ↗
6. Ashcroft Neil W, Mermin N David. Solid state physics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1976.
7. Look · Phys Rev Lett · 1999 · 82 · 123710.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1237 ↗
8. Miao · Appl Phys Lett · 2009 · 95 · 23190910.1063/1.3272017 ↗
9. Mouti · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 83 · 19530910.1103/PhysRevB.83.195309 ↗
10. Minj · Appl Phys Lett · 2010 · 97 · 13211410.1063/1.3489433 ↗
11. Cao · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 90 · 18211210.1063/1.2736207 ↗
12. Antoszewski · J Appl Phys · 2000 · 87 · 390010.1063/1.372432 ↗
13. Liu · Appl Phys Lett · 2010 · 97 · 26211110.1063/1.3532967 ↗
14. Cao · Appl Phys Lett · 2010 · 97 · 22211610.1063/1.3521258 ↗
15. Tang · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 66 · 24530510.1103/PhysRevB.66.245305 ↗
16. Vilalta-Clemente · Phys Stat Solidi A · 2010 · 207 · 110510.1002/pssa.200983119 ↗
17. Ferry · 2009
18. Kumar N et al., unpublished.
19. Pandey · Appl Phys Lett · 2011 · 99 · 01211110.1063/1.3608162 ↗
20. Minj · Scripta Mater · 2012 · 66 · 32710.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.11.024 ↗
21. Cavalcoli · Appl Phys Lett · 2011 · 98 · 14211110.1063/1.3576938 ↗
22. Jena · Appl Phys Lett · 2000 · 76 · 170710.1063/1.126143 ↗
23. NEXTNANO3 device simulation package. and .