Damage evolution during cyclic tension–tension loading of micron-sized Cu lines
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this study, the low-cycle fatigue properties (1–15,000 cycles) of electrodeposited Cu, which is frequently used as metallization in the semiconductor industry, is analyzed with respect to its microstructure. Freestanding Cu tensile samples 20 μm × 20 μm × 130 μm were fabricated by a lithographic process. The grain size of the samples was modified by using three different process conditions for electrochemical Cu deposition. All samples were subjected to cyclic tension–tension testing performed with a miniaturized stress-controlled stage in situ in a scanning electron microscope until failure occurred. The number of cycles sustained prior to failure depends on the accumulated creep strain and can be related to the failure strain in a tensile test. It will be shown that the microstructure influences the number of cycles to failure and the failure mode.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Sze · 2012
2. Doering · 2012
3. de Filippis · Microelectron Reliab · 2011 · 51 · 195410.1016/j.microrel.2011.06.047 ↗
4. Zhang · Appl Phys Lett · 2006 · 89 · 11410210.1063/1.2338885 ↗
5. Wu · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 84 · 283810.1063/1.1703844 ↗
6. Kraft · Mater Sci Eng A · 2001 · 319–321 · 91910.1016/S0921-5093(01)00990-X ↗
7. Huang · IEEE Trans Dev Mater Reliab · 2010 · 10 · 4710.1109/TDMR.2009.2032768 ↗
8. Seita · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 651310.1016/j.actamat.2010.08.014 ↗
9. Sonnweber-Ribic · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 386310.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.057 ↗
10. Hall · Proc R Soc Lond · 1951 · B64 · 747
11. Petch · J Iron Steel · 1953 · 174 · 25
12. Yang · Philos Mag · 2012 · 92 · 324310.1080/14786435.2012.693215 ↗
13. Gu · Nano Lett · 2012 · 12 · 638510.1021/nl3036993 ↗
14. Jang · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 64 · 7710.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.09.010 ↗
15. Zhang · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 312710.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.013 ↗
16. Read · Int J Fatigue · 1998 · 20 · 20310.1016/S0142-1123(97)00080-7 ↗
17. Hong · Thin Solid Films · 1996 · 283 · 17510.1016/0040-6090(95)08225-5 ↗
18. Murata N, Tamakawa K, Suzuki K, Miura H. In: International conference on electronic materials and packaging, EMAP; 2008.
19. Hofbeck · Scripta Metall · 1986 · 20 · 160110.1016/0036-9748(86)90403-5 ↗
20. Yang · Mater Sci Eng A · 2009 · 515 · 7110.1016/j.msea.2009.02.037 ↗
21. Maier · Int J Fatigue · 2006 · 28 · 24310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.05.004 ↗
22. Park · Thin Solid Films · 2006 · 504 · 32110.1016/j.tsf.2005.09.102 ↗
23. Zhang · Microelectron Reliab · 2007 · 47 · 200710.1016/j.microrel.2007.04.005 ↗
24. Park · Thin Solid Films · 2007 · 515 · 325310.1016/j.tsf.2006.01.037 ↗
25. Han · J Alloys Compd · 2007 · 434–435 · 30410.1016/j.jallcom.2006.08.179 ↗
26. Khatibi · Int J Fatigue · 2010 · 32 · 26910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.06.017 ↗
27. Kunz · Proc Eng · 2011 · 10 · 20110.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.036 ↗
28. Smolka · Rev Sci Instrum · 2012 · 83 · 06470210.1063/1.4725529 ↗
29. Yang · Int J Mater Res · 2008 · 99 · 16
30. Armstrong · J Mater Res · 2009 · 24 · 1110.1557/jmr.2009.0396 ↗
31. Sanders · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 401910.1016/S1359-6454(97)00092-X ↗
32. Thompson · Acta Metall · 1971 · 19 · 59710.1016/0001-6160(71)90012-5 ↗
33. Ledbetter · J Phys Chem Ref Data · 1974 · 3 · 89710.1063/1.3253150 ↗
34. Vinogradov · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 61 · 81710.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.07.004 ↗
35. Kunz · Mater Sci Eng A · 2006 · 424 · 9710.1016/j.msea.2006.02.029 ↗
36. Mughrabi · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 51 · 80710.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.05.012 ↗
37. Zhao · Int J Fatigue · 2012 · 38 · 4610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.11.014 ↗
38. Ryu · Int J Fatigue · 1989 · 11 · 43310.1016/0142-1123(89)90183-7 ↗
39. Agnew · J Electron Mater · 1999 · 28 · 103810.1007/s11664-999-0181-0 ↗
40. Smolka M. PhD thesis, University of Leoben; 2011.
41. Lee · Int J Fatigue · 2012 · 38 · 110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.10.008 ↗
42. Hou · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 412810.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.054 ↗
43. Kiener · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 58010.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.015 ↗
44. Dunstan · Philos Mag · 2012 · 92 · 319910.1080/14786435.2012.685967 ↗
45. Jennett · Appl Phys Lett · 2009 · 95 · 12310210.1063/1.3226106 ↗
46. Low · Proc Sec Exp Stress Anal · 1947 · 4 · 16
47. Eberl · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 361210.1016/j.actamat.2011.02.034 ↗
48. Scheriau S. Master’s thesis, University of Leoben; 2005.
49. Sanders · Mater Sci Eng A · 1997 · 234–236 · 7710.1016/S0921-5093(97)00185-8 ↗
50. Masumura · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 452710.1016/S1359-6454(98)00150-5 ↗
51. Smith · 2006
52. Basquin · Proc Am Soc Test Mater · 1910 · 10 · 625
53. Ding · Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct · 2002 · 25 · 97510.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00564.x ↗
54. Morrow JD. Internal friction, damping and cyclic plasticity. ASTM STP 378; 1965. p. 72.
55. Kraft · Z Metallkd · 2002 · 93 · 39210.3139/146.020392 ↗