Electrode Doping and Dielectric Effect in Hole Injection into Organic Semiconductors through High Work-Function Oxides
Source abstract
Abstract
High work-function metal oxides are common for enhancing hole injection into organic semiconductors. However, the current understanding of the electrostatic mechanism needs to be more consistent with materials’ electronic properties. Here, we study the electrostatic profile of high work-function oxides by considering their dielectricity and energetic disorder. Using MoO 3 as an example, we first show that the significant vacuum-level change at the electrode–oxide interface originates from electrode doping rather than the conventionally assumed interface dipole. Moreover, electrode doping is enough to explain the Fermi-level shift, so MoO 3 ’s characteristic n-type property is not necessarily due to intrinsic donors. This conclusion also applies to the n-type oxides with reduced work functions, like WO 3, V 2 O 5, and p-type NiO. Finally, the dielectricity of the oxide, either n-type or p-type, reduces the surface p-doping of the further deposited organic layer. Increasing the oxide’s metallicity and energetic disorder facilitates the hole injection.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Suzhou Key Laboratory of Novel Semiconductor-optoelectronics Materials and Devices, College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu, China
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Negative Carbon Technologies, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu, PR China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China · Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20120163010.1002/adma.201201630 ↗
2. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.32810.1038/nphoton.2012.328 ↗
3. 10.1002/cphc.20190044710.1002/cphc.201900447 ↗
4. 10.1002/adfm.20120018510.1002/adfm.201200185 ↗
5. 10.1889/1.243367210.1889/1.2433672 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20210627610.1002/adma.202106276 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.368793310.1063/1.3687933 ↗
8. 10.1166/jnn.2016.1202710.1166/jnn.2016.12027 ↗
9. 10.1143/JJAP.46.103310.1143/JJAP.46.1033 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2008.07.01610.1016/j.synthmet.2008.07.016 ↗
11. 10.1002/adfm.20170427810.1002/adfm.201704278 ↗
12. 10.1007/s12274-022-4260-310.1007/s12274-022-4260-3 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.337433310.1063/1.3374333 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.322006410.1063/1.3220064 ↗
15. 10.1016/0378-5963(82)90119-210.1016/0378-5963(82)90119-2 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.361139210.1063/1.3611392 ↗
17. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.31710.1038/nphoton.2011.317 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41563-018-0022-810.1038/s41563-018-0022-8 ↗
19. 10.1039/c3tc30881b10.1039/c3tc30881b ↗
20. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.01.20010.1016/j.apsusc.2013.01.200 ↗
21. 10.1038/ncomms517410.1038/ncomms5174 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jksus.2019.09.00910.1016/j.jksus.2019.09.009 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20220304910.1002/adfm.202203049 ↗
24. 10.1126/sciadv.150112710.1126/sciadv.1501127 ↗
25. 10.1002/admi.20210073110.1002/admi.202100731 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0189510.1021/acs.macromol.8b01895 ↗
27. 10.1021/jp010177v10.1021/jp010177v ↗
28. 10.1177/184798042098278810.1177/1847980420982788 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.323192810.1063/1.3231928 ↗
30. 10.1038/nmat315910.1038/nmat3159 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0370110.1021/acs.nanolett.9b03701 ↗
32. 10.1002/adfm.20120226910.1002/adfm.201202269 ↗
33. 10.1002/inf2.1214610.1002/inf2.12146 ↗
34. 10.1002/adfm.20140209410.1002/adfm.201402094 ↗