Active-Learning-Based Generative Design for the Discovery of Wide-Band-Gap Materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Active learning has been increasingly applied to screening functional materials from existing materials databases with desired properties. However, the number of known materials deposited in the popular materials databases such as ICSD and Materials Project is extremely limited and consists of just a tiny portion of the vast chemical design space. Herein, we present an active generative inverse design method that combines active learning with a deep autoencoder neural network and a generative adversarial deep neural network model to discover new materials with a target property in the whole chemical design space. The application of this method has allowed us to discover new thermodynamically stable materials with high band gap (SrYF 5 ) and semiconductors with specified band gap ranges (SrClF 3, CaClF 5, YCl 3, SrC 2 F 3, AlSCl, As 2 O 3 ), all of which are verified by the first-principles DFT calculations. Our experiments show that while active learning itself may sample chemically infeasible candidates, these samples help to train effective screening models for filtering out materials with desired properties from the hypothetical materials created by the generative model. The experiments show the effectiveness of our active generative inverse design approach. The source code can be freely downloaded from https://github.com/glard/Active-Generative-Design .
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29201, United States
Funding
National Science Foundation
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/jacs.9b1108410.1021/jacs.9b11084 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41467-019-08883-x10.1038/s41467-019-08883-x ↗
3. 10.1038/s41578-019-0101-810.1038/s41578-019-0101-8 ↗
4. 10.1039/D0SC00594K10.1039/D0SC00594K ↗
5. 10.1038/s41524-020-00352-010.1038/s41524-020-00352-0 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
7. 10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.1010.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 ↗
8. 10.1039/D0TC00985G10.1039/D0TC00985G ↗
9. 10.1038/s41570-018-012110.1038/s41570-018-0121 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41524-019-0263-310.1038/s41524-019-0263-3 ↗
11. 10.1002/advs.20190260710.1002/advs.201902607 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matt.2019.08.01710.1016/j.matt.2019.08.017 ↗
13. 10.1126/sciadv.aax932410.1126/sciadv.aax9324 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41524-018-0128-110.1038/s41524-018-0128-1 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c0120210.1021/acsphotonics.0c01202 ↗
16. 10.1515/nanoph-2020-040710.1515/nanoph-2020-0407 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.01101710.1103/PhysRevX.7.011017 ↗
18. 10.1002/lpor.20190044510.1002/lpor.201900445 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20170288410.1002/adma.201702884 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41524-019-0153-810.1038/s41524-019-0153-8 ↗
21. Settles, B. Active Learning Literature Survey; University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2009.
22. Schröder, C.; Niekler, A. A Survey of Active Learning for Text Classification Using Deep. 2020, arXiv:2008.07267. arXiv.org e-Print archive. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.07267 (accessed Aug 17, 2020).
23. 10.1023/B:MACH.0000011805.60520.fe10.1023/B:MACH.0000011805.60520.fe ↗
24. Sinha, S.; Ebrahimi, S.; Darrell, T. In Variational Adversarial Active Learning, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2019; pp 5972–5981.10.1109/ICCV.2019.00607 ↗
25. Melville P. · Mach. Learn. · 2004 · 74
26. 10.1038/s41524-020-0322-910.1038/s41524-020-0322-9 ↗
27. 10.1039/D0CP01474E10.1039/D0CP01474E ↗
28. Goodall, R. E.; Lee, A. A. Predicting Materials Properties Without Crystal Structure: Deep Representation Learning from Stoichiometry. 2019, arXiv:1910.00617. arXiv.org e-Print archive. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.00617 (accessed Oct 1, 2019).10.1038/s41467-020-19964-7 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41586-019-1335-810.1038/s41586-019-1335-8 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.14530110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.145301 ↗
31. Snoek J. · Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. · 2012 · 25 · 2951
32. Mockus J. · Towards Global Optim. · 1978 · 2 · 2
33. Srinivas, N.; Krause, A.; Kakade, S. M.; Seeger, M. Gaussian Process Optimization in the Bandit Setting: No Regret and Experimental Design. 2009, arXiv:0912.3995. arXiv.org e-Print archive. https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.3995 (accessed Dec 21, 2009).
34. Nogueira, F. Bayesian Optimization: Open source constrained global optimization tool for Python, 2014. https://github.com/fmfn/BayesianOptimization.
35. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0338110.1021/acs.chemmater.0c03381 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1425110.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
38. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.139610.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1396 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.02810.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
45. 10.1088/0370-1298/65/5/30710.1088/0370-1298/65/5/307 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.22410410.1103/PhysRevB.90.224104 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10803310.1016/j.cpc.2021.108033 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.10920310.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109203 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c0810310.1021/acs.jpca.0c08103 ↗