Crystallization behavior during melt-processing of ceramic waste forms
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Multiphase ceramic waste forms based on natural mineral analogs are of great interest for their high chemical durability, radiation resistance, and thermodynamic stability. Melt-processed ceramic waste forms that leverage existing melter technologies will broaden the available disposal options for high-level nuclear waste. This work reports on the crystallization behavior in selected melt-processed ceramics for waste immobilization. The phase assemblage and evolution of hollandite, zirconolite, pyrochlore, and perovskite type structures during melt processing were studied using thermal analysis, x-ray diffraction, and electron microscopy. Samples prepared by melting followed by annealing and quenching were analyzed to determine and measure the progression of the phase assemblage. Samples were melted at 1500 °C and heat-treated at crystallization temperatures of 1285 °C and 1325 °C corresponding to exothermic events identified from differential scanning calorimetry measurements. Results indicate that the selected multiphase composition partially melts at 1500 °C with hollandite coexisting as crystalline phase. Perovskite and zirconolite phases crystallized from the residual melt at temperatures below 1350 °C. Depending on their respective thermal histories, different quenched samples were found to have different phase assemblages including phases such as perovskite, zirconolite and TiO2.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Caurant · 2009
2. S.V. Stefanovsky, S.V. Yudintsev, R. Gieré, G.R. Lumpkin, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 236, (2004), 37–63.10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.236.01.04 ↗
3. Ewing · Can. Mineral. · 2001 · 39 · 69710.2113/gscanmin.39.3.697 ↗
4. Montel · C. R. Geosci. · 2011 · 343 · 23010.1016/j.crte.2010.11.006 ↗
5. Ringwood · Geochem. J. · 1979 · 13 · 14110.2343/geochemj.13.141 ↗
6. Ringwood · Nature · 1979 · 278 · 21910.1038/278219a0 ↗
7. Kesson · Soc. Lond. A. Mat. · 1986 · 405 · 73
8. Cheary · J. Nucl. Mater. · 1984 · 125 · 23610.1016/0022-3115(84)90549-X ↗
9. Cheary · Mater. Sci. Forum · 1988 · 27 · 39710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.27-28.397 ↗
10. Kesson · Soc. Lond. A. Mat. · 1986 · 408 · 295
11. Pena · Chem. Rev. · 2001 · 101 · 198110.1021/cr980129f ↗
12. Lumpkin · Elements · 2006 · 2 · 36510.2113/gselements.2.6.365 ↗
13. Aubin-Chevaldonnet · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2007 · 366 · 13710.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.12.051 ↗
14. Zhang · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2008 · 377 · 47010.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.03.022 ↗
15. Stefanovsky · J. Alloys Compd. · 2007 · 444 · 43810.1016/j.jallcom.2007.01.067 ↗
16. Clark · Metall. Mater. Trans. E · 2014 · 1 · 341
17. Tumurugoti · Ceram. Trans. · 2014 · 250 · 20510.1002/9781118996652.ch18 ↗
18. Amoroso · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2014 · 454 · 1210.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.07.035 ↗
19. Amoroso · J. Alloys Compd. · 2014 · 584 · 59010.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.087 ↗
20. Fox · 2010
21. Schumacher · 2001
22. Schumacher · 1998
23. Shelby · 2005
24. Kashaev · Sov. Phys. Cryst. · 1969 · 14 · 1064
25. Yoshimura · Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. · 1988 · 67 · 1950
26. Li · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1994 · 77 · 128910.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb05404.x ↗
27. Li · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1994 · 77 · 11810.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb06964.x ↗
28. Gong · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 277 · 23910.1016/S0022-3115(99)00195-6 ↗
29. Swenson · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1998 · 81 · 324910.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02763.x ↗
30. Xu · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2000 · 279 · 10010.1016/S0022-3115(99)00272-X ↗