journal article·2025-10Open access

Biomechanical characterization of the human pia–arachnoid complex using bulge inflation testing and the virtual fields method

Paulien Vandemaele, Heleen Fehervary, Lauranne Maes, Bart Depreitere, Jos Vander Sloten, Nele Famaey

Acta Biomaterialia· Volume 206

Abstract

The cranial meninges are crucial structures in protecting the brain against injury. Hence, a biofidelic mechanical representation of these tissues is essential for accurate computational predictions of stress and strain in the brain during a traumatic brain injury. This study presents a biomechanical analysis of human pia-arachnoid complex tissue, which is formed by the two innermost meningeal layers. Bulge inflation experiments were performed on 29 pia-arachnoid complex samples to investigate their in-plane mechanical properties and parameters of the modified one-term Ogden model were derived with the virtual fields method. Due to its anatomical structure, pia-arachnoid complex tissue has an inhomogeneous thickness with a median value of 0.400mm. A bivariate normal probability density function was identified for the log-transformed parameters obtained from different specimens and samples with mean values μ=0.30MPa and α=36.97. Results show that the mechanical behavior of pia-arachnoid complex tissue is highly nonlinear in contrast to the linear elastic models often implemented in state-of-the-art finite element head models. Since the pia-arachnoid complex tissue is closely wrapped around the brain, it is important to include a more realistic mechanical behavior into these models. Statement of significance This study presents a biomechanical characterization of the human pia-arachnoid complex tissue by employing advanced techniques such as bulge inflation testing and the virtual fields method. To the best of the author's knowledge, this research is the first to characterize the in-plane properties of the human pia-arachnoid complex tissue. Additionally, this is also the first time that properties of the pia-arachnoid complex tissue are derived based on multiaxial testing. These findings are crucial for understanding the protective function of the pia-arachnoid complex in the brain. Furthermore, this research is also a critical step towards developing more accurate computational models of the human head, which are essential for studying traumatic brain injuries.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics · Elasticity and Material Modeling · Spaceflight effects on biology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Position statement: Definition of traumatic brain injury10.1016/j.apmr.2010.05.017 ↗
2. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352 ↗
3. Disability in young people and adults one year after head injury: prospective cohort study10.1136/bmj.320.7250.1631 ↗
4. The costs of traumatic brain injury: A literature review10.2147/CEOR.S44625 ↗
5. Fifty shades of brain: A review on the mechanical testing and modeling of brain tissue
6. Advances and controversies in meningeal biology
7. Tensile strength of cranial pia mater: Preliminary results10.3171/jns.2004.100.1.0111 ↗
8. Biomechanical response of the bovine pia-arachnoid complex to tensile loading at varying strain-rates
9. Ex-vivo quantification of ovine pia arachnoid complex biomechanical properties under uniaxial tension10.1186/s12987-020-00229-w ↗
10. Hyper-viscoelastic mechanical behavior of cranial pia mater in tension10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105108 ↗
11. Mechanical properties of bovine pia-arachnoid complex in shear10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.09.035 ↗
12. Biomechanical response of the bovine pia-arachnoid complex to normal traction loading at varying strain rates
13. Micromechanical heterogeneity of the rat pia-arachnoid complex10.1016/j.actbio.2019.09.044 ↗
14. Mechanical characterization of the human pia-arachnoid complex10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104579 ↗
15. Servier Medical Art, https://smart.servier.com/. (Accessed 23 December 2024).
16. FIBEr - KU Leuven Core Facility for Biomechanical Experimentation, https://fiber.biomech.be/. (Accessed 17 March 2025).
17. VIC-3D 8 Reference Manual, Correlated Solutions.
18. Ogden · 1997
19. How robust is the virtual fields method with respect to experimental inhomogeneities for bulge inflation testing of hyperelastic materials?10.1016/j.jmbbm.2025.106965 ↗
20. A method for measuring strains in soft tissue10.1016/0021-9290(84)90110-6 ↗
21. CasADi – a software framework for nonlinear optimization and optimal control10.1007/s12532-018-0139-4 ↗
22. Protection of cortex by overlying meninges tissue during dynamic indentation of the adolescent brain10.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.022 ↗
23. Biomechanical characterization of human dura mater10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.12.023 ↗
24. Mechanical characterization and modeling of the porcine cerebral meninges10.3389/fbioe.2020.00801 ↗
25. Regional characterization of the dynamic mechanical properties of human brain tissue by microindentation10.1016/j.ijengsci.2020.103355 ↗
26. Mechanical contribution of the pia-arachnoid complex to brain tissue revealed by large deformation indentation
27. The creation of three-dimensional finite element models for simulating head impact biomechanics
28. Biofidelic finite element modelling of brain trauma: Importance of the scalp in simulating head impact10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105448 ↗
29. Predictors for traumatic brain injuries evaluated through accident reconstructions10.4271/2007-22-0003 ↗
30. Can sulci protect the brain from traumatic injury?10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.06.051 ↗
31. Computational modelling of traumatic brain injury predicts the location of chronic traumatic encephalopathy pathology10.1093/brain/aww317 ↗
32. An in vitro model of traumatic brain injury utilising two-dimensional stretch of organotypic hippocampal slice cultures10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.06.014 ↗
33. Mechanical characterization of brain tissue in tension at dynamic strain rates10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.07.015 ↗