Interface accommodation of asymmetric cells in the Apis mellifera honeycomb
Source abstract
Abstract
Honeycomb is an engineering and architectural marvel used by bees to store food and raise brood. It is constantly being added to or subtracted from by workers in the colony. The size and shape of comb can vary dramatically based on need, and workers often have to merge or manipulate comb of varying size and shape. This variation in cell sizes causes the bees to adjust construction of the hexagonal comb lattice to accommodate the inherent distortions caused by size differences. Here, we shed light on lattice distortions at the interface between worker (small) and drone (large) cells, as well as around non-polygonal queen cells. Using time-resolved X-ray microscopy, we show that the merger between two combs is initially facilitated by the copings- a bulb like structure that extends the corrugated spine of the comb. We show that bees attempt to maintain the corrugated nature of the spine in the merging region and inevitably end up creating distorted cells that they later attempt to normalize. To highlight this, we propose a new distortion parameter to quantify in 3D, distortions within cells and thereby quantifiably show how bees modify individual cells to lower this parameter to a proposed threshold level. Finally, we shed light on a previously overlooked interface between a typical honeycomb lattice and non-polygonal queen cells and describe how bees use a previously unreported strategy of building interstitial cells to incorporate highly irregular cells into the ordered hexagonal lattice of the comb. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: It has been speculated for years that honeybees have developed efficient design principles and valuable strategies to optimally use materials and resources when constructing comb. Studying and understanding these complex structures, non-destructively as the bees build them out, can be challenging. In our paper, we have used four-dimensional x-ray microscopy, to unravel several unique and previously unreported mechanisms for interface accommodation between different honeycomb cells. Here we show, at a microscopic level, that the coping at the edges of the comb is used to link and accommodate the cells of different sizes. More importantly, we have developed a quantitative methodology to capture the deviation in shape of the hexagonal cell to capture the degree of accommodation at the interface.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior · Insect and Pesticide Research · Plant Reproductive Biology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Proving the perfection of the honeycomb10.1126/science.285.5432.1338 ↗
2. Little · 1921
3. Mr. Hunter’s observations on bees10.1098/rstl.1792.0011 ↗
4. Darwin · On The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection · 1859
5. What the bees know and what they do not know10.1090/S0002-9904-1964-11155-1 ↗
6. J. Tautz, The Buzz about Bees, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78729-7.10.1007/978-3-540-78729-7 ↗
7. Hepburn · 2014
8. Cannonballs and honeycombs
9. The honeycomb conjecture10.1007/s004540010071 ↗
10. Special adhesion of natural honeycomb walls and their application10.1039/C4CP04615C ↗
11. Hierarchical, multilayered cell walls reinforced by recycled silk cocoons enhance the structural integrity of honeybee combs10.1073/pnas.0912066107 ↗
12. The effect of comb cell size on the development of Apis mellifera drones10.3390/life14020222 ↗
13. Anton · An Introduction to Queen Honey Bee Development · 2023
14. Breed · Anim. Behav. · 2019 · 100
15. The production of queen cups and queen cells in relation to the general development of honeybee colonies, and its connection with swarming and supersedure10.1080/00218839.1965.11100115 ↗
16. Seasonal variations in the organization and structure of Apis cerana cerana swarm queen cells10.13102/sociobiology.v68i4.7208 ↗
17. Construction defects define pattern and method in comb building by honeybees10.1051/apido:19910403 ↗
18. Comb construction in mixed-species colonies of honeybees, Apis cerana and Apis mellifera10.1242/jeb.035626 ↗
19. Imperfect comb construction reveals the architectural abilities of honeybees10.1073/pnas.2103605118 ↗
20. Crystallography of honeycomb formation under geometric frustration10.1073/pnas.2205043119 ↗
21. Honey bees and social wasps reach convergent architectural solutions to nest-building problems10.1371/journal.pbio.3002211 ↗
22. Ordering and topological defects in social wasps’ nests10.1038/s41598-022-16836-6 ↗
23. Bioinspired Honeycomb core Design: an experimental study of the role of corner radius, coping and interface10.3390/biomimetics5040059 ↗
24. Advanced microstructural and compositional analysis of a lunar agglutinate from the Apollo 11 mission
25. Cholla cactus wood (Cylindropuntia imbricata): hierarchical structure and micromechanical properties10.1016/j.actbio.2023.12.005 ↗
26. P.J. Withers, D. Grimaldi, C.K. Hagen, E. Maire, M. Manley, A.Du Plessis, X-ray computed tomography, Nat. Rev. Methods Prim. (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00015-4.10.1038/s43586-021-00015-4 ↗
27. Tensile and fracture behavior of silica fibers from the Venus flower basket (Euplectella aspergillum)10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2022.111622 ↗
28. Bio-inspired selective nodal decoupling for ultra-compliant interwoven lattices10.1038/s43246-023-00363-6 ↗
29. Probing novel microstructural evolution mechanisms in aluminum alloys using 4D nanoscale characterization10.1002/adma.201703482 ↗
30. Four-dimensional materials science: time-resolved x-ray microcomputed tomography10.1557/s43577-025-00859-1 ↗
31. Exploring novel deformation mechanisms in aluminum–copper alloys using in situ 4D nanomechanical testing10.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.016 ↗
32. Unraveling the mechanisms of the Apis mellifera honeycomb construction by 4D X-ray microscopy
33. Harris · 1988
34. Mechanical behavior and microstructure characterization of sinter-forged SiC particle reinforced aluminum matrix composites10.1016/S1471-5317(03)00005-1 ↗
35. Modeling the effect of particle clustering on the mechanical behavior of SiC particle reinforced Al matrix composites10.1007/s10853-006-0100-1 ↗
36. Numerical simulation of the effect of particle spatial distribution and strength on tensile behavior of particle reinforced composites10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.04.009 ↗
37. Honeybee evolution: royal jelly proteins help queen larvae to stay on top10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.065 ↗