Additively manufactured shape-morphing implants for the treatment of acetabular defects
Source abstract
Abstract
Acetabular defects pose significant challenges in orthopedic surgery, particularly in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Here, we design, additively manufacture, and evaluate shape-morphing porous implants with kinematic structures to address these defects. Three defect types were examined using synthetic hemipelvis models: posterior wall, cranial-posterior combination, and central-posterior defects. The implants were secured with screws and bone cement, and their surface conformity was assessed through micro computed tomography (µCT). Biomechanical performance was evaluated under quasi-static compression and cyclic loading conditions. Results demonstrated high surface conformity of the flexible mesh across all defect types, with minimal differences from healthy acetabula (< 10 mm). The mesh implants exhibited strong load-bearing capacity, with failures occurring only in the pubic region of the hemipelvis, while both the implants and mesh-cement interfaces remained intact. The implants withstood cyclic loading simulating half the body weight of a 80 kg patient for >1000,000 loading cycles with no evidence of fatigue failure, further confirming their durability. These findings suggest that the flexible mesh implant provides a potential solution for complex acetabular defects, offering anatomical conformity and mechanical stability, even in cases where conventional mesh grafts might be inadequate. Future studies, including cadaveric testing and clinical trials, are necessary to further validate these results in (pre-)clinical settings. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This study addresses the need for adaptable solutions to complex acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Traditional implants struggle to conform to severe bone loss and irregular geometries, risking suboptimal fit, and implant migration. We introduce a 3D-printed, shape-morphing porous implant with kinematic structures, offering high anatomical conformity, mechanical robustness, and support for bone graft integration. Combining the adaptability of patient-specific implants with the efficiency of standard designs, this implant reduces lead times while enabling a tailored fit. This innovative approach provides a reliable solution for managing complex defects, addressing limitations of conventional implants, and improving outcomes in orthopedic reconstruction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Anatomy and Medical Technology · Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Current construct options for revision of large acetabular defects: a systematic review10.2106/JBJS.RVW.15.00119 ↗
2. F. Mancino, G. Cacciola, V. Di Matteo, D. De Marco, A. Greenberg, C. Perisano, M. Ma, P.K. Sculco, G. Maccauro, I. De Martino, Reconstruction options and outcomes for acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty, (2035-8237 (Print)).
3. Chen · 2022
4. W.Y. Shon, S.S. Santhanam, J.W. Choi, Acetabular Reconstruction in Total Hip Arthroplasty, (2287-3260 (Print)).
5. High accuracy of positioning custom triflange acetabular components in tumour and total hip arthroplasty revision surgery10.1302/2633-1462.54.BJO-2023-0185.R1 ↗
6. J.A. Shaw, A. Bailey Jh Fau - Bruno, R.B. Bruno A Fau - Greer, 3rd, R.B. Greer, 3rd, Threaded acetabular components for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty, (0883-5403 (Print)).
7. P.K. Sculco, T. Wright, M.A. Malahias, A. Gu, M. Bostrom, F. Haddad, S. Jerabek, M. Bolognesi, T. Fehring, A. Gonzalez DellaValle, W. Jiranek, W. Walter, W. Paprosky, D. Garbuz, T. Sculco, The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium, (1556-3316 (Print)).
8. D.G. Allan, A. Bell Rs Fau - Davis, F. Davis A Fau - Langer, F. Langer, Complex acetabular reconstruction for metastatic tumor, (0883-5403 (Print)).
9. B.N. Trumm, S.S. Callaghan Jj Fau - Liu, D.D. Liu Ss Fau - Goetz, R.C. Goetz Dd Fau - Johnston, R.C. Johnston, Revision with cementless acetabular components: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports, (1535-1386 (Electronic)).
10. C.L. Sheth Np Fau - Nelson, B.D. Nelson Cl Fau - Springer, T.K. Springer Bd Fau - Fehring, W.G. Fehring Tk Fau - Paprosky, W.G. Paprosky, Acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation and management, (1067-151X (Print)).
11. B.T. Barlow, G.H. McLawhorn As Fau - Westrich, G.H. Westrich, The Cost-Effectiveness of Dual Mobility Implants for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Computer-Based Cost-Utility Model, (1535-1386 (Electronic)).
12. Design considerations for patient-specific bone fixation plates: a literature review10.1007/s11517-023-02900-4 ↗
13. Ries · 2024 · 91
14. Acetabular component revision in total hip arthroplasty. Part II: management of major bone loss and pelvic discontinuity
15. Custom triflange acetabular components for large acetabular defect reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis on 1218 patients10.1530/EOR-22-0081 ↗
16. Biomechanical and clinical effect of patient-specific or customized knee implants: a review10.3390/jcm9051559 ↗
17. 3D printed acetabular cups for total hip arthroplasty: a review article10.3390/met9070729 ↗
18. Three-dimensional-printing technology in hip and pelvic surgery: current landscape10.5371/hp.2020.32.1.1 ↗
19. 3D printing for hip implant applications: a review10.3390/polym12112682 ↗
20. Custom 3D-printed triflange implants for treatment of severe acetabular defects, with and without pelvic discontinuity: early results of our first 19 consecutive cases10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00057 ↗
21. A. Taninaka, T. Kabata, Y. Kajino, D. Inoue, T. Ohmori, Y. Yamamuro, T. Kataoka, Y. Saiki, Y. Yanagi, M. Ima, Accurate implant placement in THA using three-dimensional printed custom-made acetabular component for massive defects, Proceedings of The 22nd Annual Meeting of the Interna, 2024, pp. 110–114.10.29007/w71l ↗
22. Three-dimensional-printed titanium implants for severe acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty: short-and mid-term results10.1007/s00264-022-05390-5 ↗
23. 3D-printed personalized porous acetabular component to reconstruct extensive acetabular bone defects in primary hip arthroplasty
24. Custom-made 3D-printed porous metal acetabular composite component in revision hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type III acetabular defects: a case report10.3233/THC-212984 ↗
25. Virtual biomechanical assessment of porous tantalum and custom triflange components in the treatment of patients with acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity10.1302/0301-620X.106B5.BJJ-2023-0852.R1 ↗
26. Lee · 2023
27. A.A.-O. Di Laura, J. Henckel, A. Hart, Custom 3D-printed implants for acetabular reconstruction: intermediate-term functional and radiographic results. LID - 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00120 [doi] LID - e22.00120, (2472-7245 (Electronic)).
28. Design for additive Bio-manufacturing: from patient-specific medical devices to rationally designed meta-biomaterials10.3390/ijms18081607 ↗
29. Semi-automated digital workflow to design and evaluate patient-specific mandibular reconstruction implants10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105291 ↗
30. 3D printed patient-specific fixation plates for the treatment of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: topology optimization vs. conventional design10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106173 ↗
31. Acetabular impaction grafting with mesh for acetabular bone defects: a systematic review10.1177/1120700020971851 ↗
32. Additive manufacturing of biomaterials—Design principles and their implementation10.3390/ma15155457 ↗
33. Additive manufacturing of non-assembly deployable mechanisms for the treatment of large bony defects
34. 4D printing of reconfigurable metamaterials and devices10.1038/s43246-021-00165-8 ↗
35. Curvature tuning through defect-based 4D printing10.1038/s43246-024-00448-w ↗
36. Russian doll deployable meta-implants: fusion of kirigami, origami, and multi-stability10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108624 ↗
37. A multibody kinematic system approach for the design of shape-morphing mechanism-based metamaterials10.1038/s43246-023-00410-2 ↗
38. Metallic clay
39. Shape-locking in architected materials through 3D printed magnetically activated joints10.1016/j.matdes.2023.112427 ↗
40. Towards deployable meta-implants10.1039/C8TB00576A ↗
41. Revision hip arthroplasty with the use of cement and impaction grafting. Histological analysis of four cases10.2106/00004623-199503000-00011 ↗
42. THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects10.1007/s11999-015-4483-7 ↗
43. Reconstruction of acetabular defect with wire mesh and impacted bone graft in cemented acetabular revision]
44. The use of wire mesh in total hip replacement surgery10.1097/00003086-197501000-00016 ↗
45. Severe wear and pseudotumor formation due to taper mismatch in a total hip arthroplasty: a case report10.2106/JBJS.CC.N.00104 ↗
46. New minimally invasive method for treating posterior pelvic ring fractures: biomechanical validation and clinical application of sacroiliac joint locking plate
47. Triangular osteosynthesis and iliosacral screw fixation for unstable sacral fractures: a cadaveric and biomechanical evaluation under cyclic loads10.1097/00005131-200301000-00004 ↗
48. The effect of an infra-acetabular screw for anatomically shaped three-dimensional plate or standard plate designs in acetabulum fractures: a biomechanical analysis10.1007/s00068-021-01805-x ↗
49. Acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty10.1016/j.jcot.2019.11.004 ↗
50. Clinical evaluation and surgical options in acetabular reconstruction: a literature review10.1016/j.jor.2015.10.011 ↗
51. The acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of different fixation principles10.1080/17453674.1999.11744830 ↗
52. The diagnosis and treatment of acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty: an international consensus symposium10.1177/15563316211034850 ↗
53. Total hip arthroplasty after previous fracture surgery
54. Automated design of bone-preserving, insertable, and shape-matching patient-specific acetabular components10.1002/jor.25927 ↗
55. Mid-term results after revision total hip arthroplasty with custom-made acetabular implants in patients with Paprosky III acetabular bone loss10.1007/s00402-019-03318-0 ↗
56. Reconstruction options and outcomes for acetabular bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty
57. Biomechanical analysis of fixation methods in acetabular fractures: a systematic review of test setups10.1007/s00068-022-01936-9 ↗
58. Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00035-5 ↗
59. W. Petty, 2-to 10-year follow-up study of acetabular revisions using allograft bone to repair bone defects10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90076-6 ↗
60. Total hip reconstruction using frozen femoral head allografts in patients with acetabular bone loss10.1016/S0030-5898(20)30392-8 ↗
61. Impaction bone grafting in hip re-revision surgery: bone stock restoration and radiological migration of the acetabular component10.1302/0301-620X.103B3.BJJ-2020-1228.R1 ↗
62. The cost-effectiveness of dual mobility implants for primary total hip arthroplasty: a computer-based cost-utility model10.2106/JBJS.16.00109 ↗