Proteomic insights into vaginal mesh complications and treatment targets
Source abstract
Abstract
Objective To characterize differences in vaginal proteomic profiles among women with mesh exposure, mesh-related pain, and controls. Methods 10 well-integrated mesh samples (removed incidentally or normally incorporated distant from complication), 10 mesh exposure samples, 10 mesh-pain samples and 10 control vaginal biopsies of participants without mesh from a Mesh and Pelvic Floor Tissue Biorepository were analyzed. Differentially expressed protein analysis, gene ontology enrichment, clinical covariate modeling and a hypothesis-driven assessment of 100 a priori specified proteins were performed. Results Participant age of well-integrated mesh specimens (62 ± 13 years) was similar to complication samples (exposure 52 ± 7, pain 49 ± 14 years) but older than controls (42 ± 6 years). Mean BMI (28 ± 6 kg/m2) and median implantation duration (6 ± 5 years) were similar between groups. Extracellular remodeling proteins, including MMP9 and TIMP3 and neutrophil activation proteins showed the greatest difference between complications and controls. GO terms related to immunity, response to stress, cell proliferation, apoptosis, and inflammatory and fibrosis mediators were enriched in exposure. Mesh related pain group showed enrichment in collagen fibril organization and cartilage development compared to well-integrated mesh, while only morphogenesis of an epithelium and cornification were different between pain and exposure. Clinical covariate analysis revealed similar pathways. ELISA performed on a separate cohort supports elevation of TIMP3 in well-integrated mesh samples. Conclusions Even well-integrated polypropylene mesh dramatically alters the local environment. Pain and exposure complications progress through epithelial remodeling, dysregulated extracellular matrix, and fibrosis pathways similarly regardless of clinical risk factors, supporting that constructive matrix remodeling therapies and neutrophil targeting may be useful therapeutics. Statement of significance Polypropylene mesh is used in urogynecologic surgery to improve the durability and reduce invasiveness of surgical repairs, however it is associated with a high complication rate. In order to improve the response to polypropylene mesh implanted on the vagina and to design better materials, we must understand the pathways through which these complications develop. This proteomic analysis showed that inflammation, disordered extracellular and epithelial remodeling, apoptosis and fibrosis were the most different between complications and controls, both validating prior mechanistic studies and providing potential therapeutic targets, including matrix degradation protein inhibitors and neutrophil pathways.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Pelvic floor disorders treatments · Hernia repair and management · Sexual function and dysfunction studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. Eunice kennedy shriver national institute of child health and human development pelvic floor disorders network, comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial10.1001/jama.2014.1719 ↗
2. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women10.1002/14651858.CD004014.pub5 ↗
3. Evaluation and management of complications from synthetic mesh after pelvic reconstructive surgery: a multicenter study10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.012 ↗
4. Long-term rate of mesh sling removal following midurethral mesh sling insertion among women with stress urinary incontinence10.1001/jama.2018.14997 ↗
5. Long-term mesh exposure after minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy10.1007/s00192-022-05388-y ↗
6. Symptom resolution after operative management of complications from transvaginal mesh10.1097/AOG.0000000000000042 ↗
7. Polypropylene mesh and the host response10.1007/s00192-012-1718-y ↗
8. Characterization of the host inflammatory response following implantation of prolapse mesh in rhesus macaque10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.002 ↗
9. Novel large-pore lightweight polypropylene mesh has better biocompatibility for rat model of hernia10.1002/jbm.a.36326 ↗
10. The impact of prolapse mesh on vaginal smooth muscle structure and function10.1111/1471-0528.13514 ↗
11. Mesh deformation: a mechanism underlying polypropylene prolapse mesh complications in vivo10.1016/j.actbio.2022.05.051 ↗
12. Profiling of the macrophage response to polypropylene mesh burden in vivo10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123177 ↗
13. Polypropylene surgical mesh induces lipid oxidation in a nonhuman primate model10.1016/j.actbio.2025.04.003 ↗
14. Host response to synthetic mesh in women with mesh complications10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.008 ↗
15. Evidence of time dependent degradation of polypropylene surgical mesh explanted from the abdomen and vagina of sheep10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106722 ↗
16. Analyzing material changes consistent with degradation of explanted polymeric hernia mesh related to clinical characteristics10.1007/s00464-021-08882-4 ↗
17. Risk factors for mesh erosion after vaginal sling procedures for urinary incontinence10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.039 ↗
18. Dysregulated wound healing in the pathogenesis of urogynecologic mesh complications10.1038/s41598-023-48388-8 ↗
19. Shifts in macrophage phenotype at the biomaterial interface via IL-4 eluting coatings are associated with improved implant integration10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.019 ↗
20. Extracellular matrix regenerative graft attenuates the negative impact of polypropylene prolapse mesh on vagina in rhesus macaque10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.073 ↗
21. Deformation and durability of soft three-dimensional-printed polycarbonate urethane porous membranes for potential use in pelvic organ prolapse10.1115/1.4062490 ↗
22. Impact of human umbilical cord-derived stem cells (HUMSCs) on host responses to a synthetic polypropylene mesh for pelvic floor reconstruction in a rat model10.1007/s00441-020-03234-5 ↗
23. Polypropylene composite mesh modified by polyurethane gel with ROS scavenging and anti-inflammatory effects for pelvic floor repair10.1016/j.colsurfb.2023.113518 ↗
24. Electrospun nanofiber mesh with fibroblast growth factor and stem cells for pelvic floor repair
25. Tannic acid-loaded hydrogel coating endues polypropylene mesh with hemostatic and anti-inflammatory capacity for facilitating pelvic floor repair10.1093/rb/rbac074 ↗
26. 3D bioprinted endometrial stem cells on melt electrospun poly ε-caprolactone mesh for pelvic floor application promote anti-inflammatory responses in mice10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.003 ↗
27. A soft elastomer alternative to polypropylene for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a preliminary study
28. Polypropylene pelvic mesh: what went wrong and what will be of the future?10.3390/biomedicines11030741 ↗
29. Comparative analysis of tissular response after abdominal wall repair using polypropylene mesh and bovine pericardium mesh10.1590/0102-672020200003e1527 ↗
30. Towards rebuilding vaginal support utilizing an extracellular matrix bioscaffold10.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.015 ↗
31. PROSPECT study group), Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT)10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31596-3 ↗
32. The STRING database in 2023: protein-protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest10.1093/nar/gkac1000 ↗
33. Comparative analysis of histopathologic effects of synthetic meshes based on material, weight, and pore size in mice10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.031 ↗
34. Foreign body reaction to biomaterials10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 ↗
35. The pathology of the foreign body reaction against biomaterials10.1002/jbm.a.35958 ↗
36. Role of the complement system in the response to orthopedic biomaterials10.3390/ijms19113367 ↗
37. Immunochemical analysis on polypropylene mesh: does mesh size make a difference?10.1007/s00192-020-04399-x ↗
38. Extracellular S100A4 as a key player in fibrotic diseases10.1111/jcmm.15259 ↗
39. S100A4 promotes liver fibrosis via activation of hepatic stellate cells10.1016/j.jhep.2014.07.035 ↗
40. S100A4+ macrophages are necessary for pulmonary fibrosis by activating lung fibroblasts10.3389/fimmu.2018.01776 ↗
41. Deterioration in biomechanical properties of the vagina following implantation of a high-stiffness prolapse mesh10.1111/1471-0528.12077 ↗
42. S100A8/A9 in inflammation10.3389/fimmu.2018.01298 ↗
43. Damage-associated molecular patterns in inflammatory diseases10.4110/in.2018.18.e27 ↗
44. S100 proteins as an important regulator of macrophage inflammation10.3389/fimmu.2017.01908 ↗
45. Mesh induced fibrosis: the protective role of T regulatory cells10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.031 ↗
46. T regulatory cells and TH17 cells in peri-silicone implant capsular fibrosis10.1097/PRS.0b013e31823aeacf ↗
47. T regulatory cells and TGF-β1: predictors of the host response in mesh complications10.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.051 ↗
48. Neutrophils in chronic inflammatory diseases10.1038/s41423-021-00832-3 ↗
49. Role of fibronectin in normal wound healing10.1111/iwj.12109 ↗
50. Fibronectin expression is critical for liver fibrogenesis in vivo and in vitro10.3892/mmr.2016.5673 ↗
51. Inhibiting fibronectin attenuates fibrosis and improves cardiac function in a model of heart failure10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034609 ↗
52. Tenascin-C at a glance10.1242/jcs.190546 ↗
53. SPARC, a matricellular protein: at the crossroads of cell-matrix10.1016/S0945-053X(00)00105-0 ↗
54. The role of SPARC in extracellular matrix assembly10.1007/s12079-009-0062-6 ↗
55. Keratins modulate cellular reduction‒oxidation homeostasis and mitochondrial dynamics10.1016/j.jid.2021.12.025 ↗
56. The expanding significance of keratin intermediate filaments in normal and diseased epithelia10.1016/j.ceb.2012.10.018 ↗
57. Characterization of the T-cell response to polypropylene mesh in women with complications10.1016/j.ajog.2018.11.121 ↗
58. Polypropylene mesh implantation for hernia repair causes myeloid cell-driven persistent inflammation10.1172/jci.insight.123862 ↗
59. Biomechanical properties of prolapsed vaginal tissue in pre- and postmenopausal women10.1007/s001920200019 ↗
60. Impact of parity on ewe vaginal mechanical properties relative to the nonhuman primate and rodent10.1007/s00192-016-2963-2 ↗
61. Biomechanical properties of prolapsed vaginal tissue in pre- and postmenopausal women10.1007/s00192-006-0214-7 ↗
62. Uncovering the relationship between macrophages and polypropylene surgical mesh10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.213800 ↗
63. Pathogenesis of polypropylene mesh complications in female pelvic floor surgery10.1016/j.ajog.2025.03.009 ↗
64. Influence of polypropylene mesh degradation on tissue inflammatory reaction10.1002/jbm.a.37494 ↗
65. Pro - inflammatory cytokines and metalloproteinase activation in polypropylene mesh implant in rat subcutaneous tissue10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0553 ↗
66. Polypropylene surgical mesh coated with extracellular matrix mitigates the host foreign body response10.1002/jbm.a.34671 ↗
67. Polypropylene mesh predicts mesh/suture exposure after sacrocolpopexy independent of known risk factors: a retrospective case-control study10.1097/SPV.0000000000000452 ↗