Cell seeding simulation on micropatterned islands shows cell density depends on area to perimeter ratio, not on island size or shape
Source abstract
Abstract
Protein micropatterned substrates have been used to control cell size, shape, and cell-cell contacts, characteristics that influence a range of cell behaviors from early cell differentiation to late stages of maturation. Knowing the initial island cell seeding density is important to interpreting results and understanding downstream cell behavior. While studies routinely report the intended or target cell seeding density, they do not report the actual cell seeding density on the islands. As cells proliferate, differences in initial cell seeding density could compound and may lead to misinterpretation of results. In this work, we present a cell seeding simulation and apply it to 100s of islands with a range of geometries (sizes and shapes) to explore how island cell seeding density relates to the target or unpatterned cell seeding density. We first experimentally validate the simulation and then show that normalized island cell seeding density depends on island size, shape, and spacing, but can be predicted solely from island area to perimeter ratio, A2P, via a power law relationship for a wide range of island geometries. Interestingly, normalized island cell seeding density is the same as the normalized unpatterned cell seeding density for A2P ≥ 17 µm. This simulation will help to design micropatterned substrates and to have more accurate representation of the island cell seeding density at the start of experiments. By knowing the island cell seeding density, we can more easily reproduce results across research groups to understand the roles of cell-cell contact and cell size and shape on cell behavior. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: We present a cell seeding simulation on protein-micropatterned substrates and use it to simulate seeding across 100s of island geometries (size, shape, and spacing) covering two orders of magnitude in size. The simulation shows that island cell density varies significantly with island geometry compared to the target seeding density. However, island cell density can be predicted from one geometric parameter - the island's area to perimeter ratio. Results will help direct researchers on how to achieve uniform cell density across all island geometries. Since cell density and island shape both influence cell behaviors, such as differentiation, this simulation may help to isolate these factors, facilitate micropatterned substrate design, and provide a mechanism for more reproduceable results across studies.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells10.1073/pnas.0903269107 ↗
2. Effect of cell anisotropy on differentiation of stem cells on micropatterned surfaces through the controlled single cell adhesion10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.07.035 ↗
3. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stemm cell lineage commitment10.1016/S1534-5807(04)00075-9 ↗
4. The effect of culture conditions on the adipogenic and osteogenic inductions of mesenchymal stem cells on micropatterned surfaces10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.010 ↗
5. The regulation of stem cell differentiation by cell-cell contact on micropatterned material surfaces10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.006 ↗
6. The effect of mesenchymal stem cell shape on the maintenance of multipotency10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.02.029 ↗
7. Directing stem cell fate on hydrogel substrates by controlling cell geometry, matrix mechanics and adhesion ligand composition10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.07.074 ↗
8. The alignment and fusion assembly of adipose-derived stem cells on mechanically patterned matrices10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.057 ↗
9. Emergence of patterned stem cell differentiation within multicellular structures10.1634/stemcells.2008-0432 ↗
10. Effects of substrate stiffness and cell-cell contact on mesenchymal stem cell differentiation10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.05.004 ↗
11. Size-controlled insulin-secreting cell clusters10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.010 ↗
12. Geometric control of human stem cell morphology and differentiation10.1039/c0ib00016g ↗
13. A.E. Oliver, V. Ngassam, P. Dang, B. Sanii, H. Wu, C.K. Yee, Y. Yeh, A.N. Parikh, Cell attachment behavior on solid and fluid substrates exhibiting spatial patterns of physical properties, 25 (2009) 6992–6996. doi:10.1021/la900166u.10.1021/la900166u ↗
14. Kita · 2011 · 6
15. Microcontact printing of fibronectin on a biodegradable polymeric surface for skeletal muscle cell orientation10.1177/039139881003300804 ↗
16. Micropatterned dynamically adhesive substrates for cell migration10.1021/la102955m ↗
17. Manipulation of 3D cluster size and geometry by release from 2D micropatterns10.1007/s12195-012-0236-9 ↗
18. Directed cell growth on protein-functionalized hydrogel surfaces10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.01.024 ↗
19. Spreading area and shape regulate apoptosis and differentiation of osteoblasts10.1088/1748-6041/8/5/055005 ↗
20. Thermoresponsive micropatterned substrates for single cell studies10.1371/journal.pone.0037548 ↗
21. Geometric guidance of integrin mediated traction stress during stem cell differentiation10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.005 ↗
22. Matrix directed adipogenesis and neurogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adipose tissue and bone marrow10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.037 ↗
23. Adhesive and mechanical regulation of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in human bone marrow and periosteum-derived progenitor cells10.1242/bio.20122162 ↗
24. Effect of initial cell seeding density on early osteogenic signal expression of rat bone marrow stromal cells cultured on cross-linked poly(propylene fumarate) disks10.1021/bm900240k ↗
25. Differentiation, growth and activity of rat bone marrow stromal cells on resorbable poly(L/DL-lactide) membranes10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.009 ↗
26. Effect of cell seeding density on proliferation and osteodifferentiation of umbilical cord stem cells on calcium phosphate cement-fiber scaffold10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0048 ↗
27. Substrate stress relaxation regulates cell spreading10.1038/ncomms7365 ↗
28. Characterizing and patterning polyacrylamide substrates functionalized with n-hydroxysuccinimide10.1007/s12195-013-0288-5 ↗
29. Differences in morphology and traction generation of cell lines representing different stages of osteogenesis.10.1115/1.4031848 ↗
30. Controlling cell geometry on substrates of variable stiffness can tune the degree of osteogenesis in human mesenchymal stem cells10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.01.009 ↗
31. Patterned hydrogel substrates for cell culture with electrohydrodynamic jet printing10.1002/mabi.201100004 ↗
32. Effects of cell-cell contact and oxygen tension on chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.06.018 ↗
33. Effects of plating density and culture time on bone marrow stromal cell characteristics10.1016/j.exphem.2008.03.019 ↗
34. Effects of matrix elasticity and cell density on human mesenchymal stem cells differentiation10.1002/jor.22374 ↗