journal article·2019-04

Biomechanical behavior of cavity design on teeth restored using ceramic inlays: An approach based on three-dimensional finite element analysis and ultrahigh-speed camera

Chun-Wen Cheng, Weng-Pin Chen, Yu-Ting Chien, Yu-Ting Teng, Pei-Ying Lu, Shih-Hao Huang, Po-Yen Lin, Yu-Chih Chiang

Acta Biomaterialia· Volume 89
Publisher page

Abstract

Ceramic fracture and debonding are the primary failures that follow ceramic inlay and can lead to stress and tooth fracture. In this study, we examined two designs-concave and flat-of the gingival cavity bottom for tooth cavities restored using ceramic inlays. We investigated the biomechanical behavior of ceramic inlay-restored teeth (concave and flat) through three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) and experimentally validated the results using an ultrahigh-speed camera. We conducted in vitro real-time recording of the deformation of a restored tooth during loading using an ultrahigh-speed camera. This technique enables further image registration to observe deformation variation and vector fields. The deformation vector fields revealed that the concave design moved the deformation toward the buccal side of the cavity bottom, whereas the flat design moved it toward the palatal side. These findings correlated with the FEA results, which indicated that the concave design constrained stress in the dentin cavity and relieved palatal stress. Our results suggest that incorporating a concave design in cavity preparation can improve the fracture resistance of ceramic inlay-restored teeth, preventing unrestorable fractures. The current study is the first to utilize an ultrahigh-speed camera in dental biomechanics, and such cameras are useful for nondestructive and dynamic analysis. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: First utilize ultrahigh-speed cameras in dental biomechanics analysis. Tooth fracture videos captured by ultrahigh-speed camera helps us learn fracture mechanics in between tooth cavity design and ceramic inlay. Concave design leads to stress in safer areas that causes a less damaging fracture. Minimal invasive preparation by concave design strengthens tooth fracture resistance. Non-destructive data from ultrahigh-speed cameras combined with FEA can get more insight into how the stress and strain derived in biomaterials.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Research and COVID-19 · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.009 ↗
2. A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin-enamel-bonded pressed ceramic coverages10.1016/j.dental.2010.05.008 ↗
3. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: five-year follow-up10.2341/12-039-C ↗
4. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: 12-year follow-up10.1007/s00784-015-1669-z ↗
5. A practice-based research network on the survival of ceramic inlay/onlay restorations10.1016/j.dental.2016.02.006 ↗
6. Up to 27-years clinical long-term results of chairside Cerec 1 CAD/CAM inlays and onlays
7. Influence of material selection on the risk of inlay fracture during pre-cementation functional occlusal tapping10.1016/j.dental.2010.09.002 ↗
8. Stresses generated by luting resins during cementation of composite and ceramic inlays10.1111/j.1365-2842.1992.tb01088.x ↗
9. Effect of elasticity on stress distribution in CAD/CAM dental crowns: glass ceramic vs. polymer-matrix composite10.1016/j.jdent.2015.01.008 ↗
10. Stress distribution in premolars restored with inlays or onlays: 3D finite element analysis10.4047/jap.2018.10.3.184 ↗
11. Considerations for ceramic inlays in posterior teeth: a review10.2147/CCIDE.S42016 ↗
12. Fracture strength of teeth restored with ceramic inlays and overlays10.1590/S0103-64402009000200010 ↗
13. Effect of cavity design on tooth surface strain10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.004 ↗
14. Influence of preparation design on failure risks of ceramic inlays: a finite element analysis
15. Fracture risk of lithium-disilicate ceramic inlays: a finite element analysis10.1016/j.dental.2013.09.012 ↗
16. Influence of restorative material and proximal cavity design on the fracture resistance of MOD inlay restoration10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.006 ↗
17. Effect of a retention groove on the shear bond strength of dentin-bonded restorations10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.032 ↗
18. Influence of cavity preparation design on fracture resistance of posterior Leucite-reinforced ceramic restorations10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.022 ↗
19. Fracture strength of cusp replacing resin composite restorations
20. The influence of elastic modulus of inlay materials on stress distribution and fracture of premolars10.2341/13-092-L ↗
21. 3D-finite element analyses of cusp movements in a human upper premolar, restored with adhesive resin-based composites10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00098-7 ↗
22. Elastic modulus and stress-strain response of human enamel by nano-indentation10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.045 ↗
23. Mechanical behavior of post-restored upper canine teeth: a 3D FE analysis10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.009 ↗
24. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.008 ↗
25. Impact of oral fluids on dental ceramics: what is the clinical relevance?10.1016/j.dental.2013.08.199 ↗
26. A demographic analysis of vertical root fractures10.1016/j.joen.2006.07.008 ↗
27. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60029-3 ↗
28. Experimental investigation of the shear strengths of teeth in the region of the dentinoenamel junction
29. Ultimate tensile strength of tooth structures10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00110-6 ↗
30. Physical properties of the dentin-enamel junction region
31. A comparison of the effects of two canal preparation techniques on root fracture susceptibility and fracture pattern10.1097/01.don.0000140580.03121.61 ↗
32. Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00173-2 ↗
33. Effect of adhesive layer properties on stress distribution in composite restorations–a 3D finite element analysis10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00042-2 ↗
34. In vitro measurement of cuspal strain and displacement in composite restored teeth10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00047-4 ↗
35. Delayed photo-activation effects on mechanical properties of dual cured resin cements and finite element analysis of shrinkage stresses in teeth restored with ceramic inlays10.2341/15-090-L ↗
36. Determination of changes on tooth-colored cervical restorations in vivo using a three-dimensional laser scanning device10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.108003233.x ↗
37. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear10.1177/00220345970760111201 ↗
38. Occlusal caries extension in relation to visual and radiographic diagnostic criteria: results from a microcomputed tomography study10.2341/13-128-L ↗