journal article·2013-12

An in vitro study on the maturation of conventional glass ionomer cements and their interface to dentin

Julius Zoergiebel, Nicoleta Ilie

Acta Biomaterialia· Volume 9· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

The objective of the study was to investigate the influence of long-term storage (up to 1 year) and coating on the variation of micro-mechanical properties of four conventional restorative glass ionomer cements (GICs) within 3.5 mm deep class I cavities. Four commercially available GICs (Riva Self Cure (SDI), ChemFil Rock (Dentsply), Fuji IX Fast and Fuji IX GP Extra/Equia (GC)) were applied to 100 teeth. In each tooth, two similar 3.5 mm deep class I cavities were prepared and filled with the GICs, with and without resin coating. The samples were stored in artificial saliva at 37 °C for 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year. The variation in mechanical properties (indentation modulus (E) and Vickers hardness (HV)) were determined in 100 μm steps starting from the filling surface, through the intermediate layer in between dentine and GIC, and ending 100 μm in dentin. HV and E were strongly influenced by the material (P<0.05, partial eta-squared ηP(2) = 0.31 and 0.23) but less by aging duration (P<0.05, ηP(2) = 0.02 and 0.12) and resin coating (P<0.05, ηP(2) = 0.02 and 0.03). The depth of measurement (0-2 mm) has no influence on HV (P = 0.789). HV shows a gentle increase over the 1 year storage period (P = 0.002). A ∼300 μm GIC zone at the areas close to dentin with weaker properties as those measured in dentin or GIC was identified in all fillings, irrespective of the presence of coating, and at all storage periods. The thickness of this zone is more strongly influenced by storage (P<0.05, ηP(2) = 0.081) than by material type (P<0.05, ηP(2) = 0.056), while coating showed no influence (P = 0.869). Filler morphology and dimension were similar to upper parts of the GIC filling; however, the amount of low cations was higher. We concluded that the development of an intermediate layer in between dentine and GIC with lower mechanical properties might be responsible for the bond quality of GIC to dentine. Moreover, class I GIC restorations are unlikely to feature constant mechanical properties throughout the cavity, regardless of conditions such as aging and coating.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Erosion and Treatment · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00068-9 ↗
2. Glass ionomers: the next generation. A summary of the current situation10.1111/j.1708-8240.1994.tb00859.x ↗
3. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Glass-ionomer cements: past, present and future
4. Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials—fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.022 ↗
5. Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry
6. The effect of varnishes and other surface treatments on water movement across the glass ionomer cement surface10.1111/j.1834-7819.1989.tb04641.x ↗
7. Effectiveness of surface protection for resin-modified glass-ionomer materials
8. Zoergiebel J, Ilie N Evaluation of a conventional glass ionomer cement with new zinc formulation: effect of coating, aging and storage agents. Clinical Oral Investigations:1–8. doi:10.1007/s00784-012-0733-1.10.1007/s00784-012-0733-1 ↗
9. Effect of one-year water storage on the surface microhardness of resin-modified versus conventional glass-ionomer cements10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00042-8 ↗
10. Long-term surface micro-hardness of resin-modified glass ionomers10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00011-6 ↗
11. Long-term mechanical properties of glass ionomers10.1016/0109-5641(94)90044-2 ↗
12. A long-term study on the setting reaction of glass ionomer cements by 27Al MAS-NMR spectroscopy10.1016/j.dental.2008.07.008 ↗
13. The effect of storage in aqueous solutions on glass-ionomer and zinc polycarboxylate dental cements10.1023/A:1008929923531 ↗
14. Changes in surface hardness of conventional restorative glass ionomer cements10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00135-5 ↗
15. Mechanical behavior of glass ionomer cements affected by long-term storage in water10.1016/0109-5641(94)90020-5 ↗
16. Surface hardness change of restorative filling materials stored in saliva10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00053-1 ↗
17. Mechanism of adhesion of polyelectrolyte cements to hydroxyapatite10.1177/00220345830620051801 ↗
18. The role of diffusible ionic species in the bonding of polycarboxylate cements to dentine: an in vitro study10.1177/00220345790580041401 ↗
19. The mechanism for erosion of glass-ionomer cements in organic-acid buffer solutions10.1177/00220345900690051001 ↗
20. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of the dentin–glass ionomer cement interface10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00036-6 ↗
21. DIN 50351–1 Prüfung metallischer Werkstoffe - Universalhärteprüfung Teil 1: Prüfverfahren [Testing Metallic Materials - Universal Hardness Test Part 1: Test Method].
22. Chemistry of glass-ionomer cements: a review10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00128-2 ↗
23. O’Brien · 1997
24. Anusavice K Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials, 10th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1996. p. 69.
25. Dynamic and static moduli of elasticity of resin-based materials10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00021-5 ↗
26. Glass-ionomer cements of improved flexural strength10.1177/00220345860650021101 ↗
27. The influence of polyacid molecular weight on some properties of glass-ionomer cements10.1177/00220345890680021401 ↗
28. Crisp S, Lewis BG, Wilson AD (1976) Characterization of glass-ionomer cements: 2. Effect of the powder: liquid ratio on the physical properties. Journal of Dentistry 4 (6):287–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(76)80008-5.10.1016/S0300-5712(76)80008-5 ↗
29. Characterization of glass-ionomer cements. 3. Effect of polyacid concentration on the physical properties10.1016/S0300-5712(77)80025-0 ↗
30. Influence of glass composition on the properties of glass polyalkenoate cements. Part I: influence of aluminium to silicon ratio10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00058-7 ↗
31. Environmental degradation of glass-ionomer cements: A depth-sensing microindentation study10.1002/jbm.b.30697 ↗
32. Depth microhardness of glass ionomer cements10.1016/0142-9612(96)80758-7 ↗
33. DENTSPLY Wissenschaftliches Kompendium ChemFil Rock. www.dentsply.de.
34. Novel polyalkenoate (glass-ionomer) dental cements based on zinc silicate glasses10.1016/0142-9612(94)90055-8 ↗
35. An investigation into the structure and reactivity of calcium-zinc-silicate ionomer glasses using MAS-NMR spectroscopy10.1007/s10856-006-8465-x ↗
36. The processing, mechanical properties and bioactivity of zinc based glass ionomer cements10.1007/s10856-005-3578-1 ↗
37. Hume GJMaWR, Preservation and Restoration of Tooth Structure. London: Mosby, London, 1998.
38. The effect of particle size distribution on an experimental glass-ionomer cement10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.016 ↗
39. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00093-7 ↗
40. Influence of environmental calcium/phosphate and pH on glass ionomers10.1111/j.1600-0722.2007.00443.x ↗
41. Evidence of Chemical Bonding at Biomaterial-Hard Tissue Interfaces10.1177/00220345000790020301 ↗
42. Watson TF BR, Williams JA (1991) The interfacial region of the tooth/glass ionomer restoration: a confocal optical microscope study. Am J Dent Dec; 4(6)::303–310.
43. Confocal microscopic observation of structural changes in glass-ionomer cements and tooth interfaces10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00140-3 ↗